Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
Not even indicted, after a year under a partisan Republican AG.
No, you gave references to cases that can't be found which you claim back your story. If, as the opinion pieces that cite those cases say, they...
No spin from this side, you're the one claiming (inaccurately) that precedent is on your side when there hasn't ever been a single case brought...
No, it is incredibly relevant. Nobody has ever been prosecuted under this statute in the absence of intent. Never, not once. You're asking for...
It certainly makes sense to simple minds like yours.
Not even remotely, boy. You're the one giving out "spin," but you don't seem to have enough self awareness to be embarrassed over your stunning...
Your own quote clearly indicates what is necessary. It hasn't even been alleged that any classified material was "lost" or in any other way...
Looks like your ability to research is limited, from the McGuinness case... "Importantly, Appellant’s awareness of the potential for harm through...
Rats, I was going to make the comma separated value joke. At least someone did. :P
You're not siding with precedent. Court precedent has clearly shown that intent is required to prosecute cases like this. I'm not the one...
I vote Libertarian, take your assumptions elsewhere.
No lie at all. Republicans like to say inaccurate things like "of course the rich are getting most of the tax cut, the poor don't pay taxes" when...
In order to interpret the statute the way you do, you have to make a major assumption. You're not admitting to the assumption, but you've made...
Get back to me when it passes.
Yes, they are getting the biggest tax break because the only taxes being cut are those which primarily affect the wealthy. We could easily give...
Yes, you spelled out your assumption repeatedly, never bothering to even begin to question it, despite being called out repeatedly. One of us...
Awww, you ran out of even attempts at argument and tossed out yet another insult. Predictable. You suggested I was a liar because I accurately...
I haven't lied once, boy. You're the one restricting your view of the statute to your interpretation of the language. The law doesn't work that...
All of this is 100% accurate.
