1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

how did ron artest not get shown the door??

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by wgray, May 22, 2012.

  1. wgray

    wgray Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    3
    FOULS: FLAGRANT-UNSPORTSMANLIKE
    Posted Jan 31 2001 12:00AM
    Print RSS Feeds E-News Sign Up


    Celebrate the Tradition

    To be unsportsmanlike is to act in a manner unbecoming to the image of professional basketball. It consists of acts of deceit, disrespect of officials and profanity. The penalty for such action is a technical foul. Repeated acts shall result in expulsion from the game and a minimum fine of $1000.

    A flagrant foul-penalty (1) is unnecessary contact committed by a player against an opponent.

    A flagrant foul-penalty (2) is unnecessary and excessive contact committed by a player against an opponent. It is an unsportsmanlike act and the offender is ejected immediately.

    The offender will be subject to a fine not exceeding $35,000 and/or suspension by the Commissioner.

    See Rule 12B-Section IV for interpretation and penalties.

    he had the 1 and then he got a t?? or did i miss something???
     
  2. tehG l i d e

    tehG l i d e Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    27,940
    Likes Received:
    22,077
    This about yesterday? It was b.s. flagrant in the first place. Scott Foster gave him and Kobe a T with the quickness, probably because he was embarrassed and he didn't like getting called out. He would've only gotten ejected if it was a flagrant 2 or 2 techs.
     
  3. rhino17

    rhino17 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    18,035
    Likes Received:
    4,443
    Ron got all ball on that play yesterday. As much as I hate the Lakers, he and Kobe both got bogus Ts
     
  4. AXG

    AXG Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    6,073
    Likes Received:
    939
    Because his name is Metta World Peace
     
  5. Shaud

    Shaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,350
    Likes Received:
    451
    Once the ref gave him a tech I thought he was ejected too.
     
  6. trueroxfan

    trueroxfan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,170
    Likes Received:
    143
    I thought the same thing, but no one even mentioned it during the game. If you get a tech on a flagrant foul, and then you get a tech for your reaction, that is 2 techs...How was he not ejected? And how did no one notice this and explain why?
     
  7. nabeel623

    nabeel623 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    5

    he never got a tech on the flagrant foul. he got a flagrant foul. the tech was on his reaction. So basically he got 1 flagrant & 1 technical. = No Ejection
     
  8. DOMINATOR

    DOMINATOR Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,458
    Likes Received:
    256
    right. flagrant fouls and technical fouls are completely different things.

    artest's flagrant yesterday was complete BS. on top of that it could be debated that it wasnt even a foul, only reason it was called because whats his face fell down.
     

Share This Page