1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Sheed is the answer

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by DaFranchise, Jul 6, 2000.

  1. New Jack

    New Jack Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2000
    Messages:
    2,804
    Likes Received:
    156
    If Portland trades Wallace it's likely that they'll be trading for a point guard since that seems to be their weakest position, maybe a trade like Wallace and Stoudamire for Gary Payton.

    Either that or they would want a center, Sabonis isn't getting any younger.

    ------------------
    You ain't gotta like me, you just mad cause I tell it how it is, and you tell it how it might be.
     
  2. DaFranchise

    DaFranchise Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2000
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    How about this completely unrealistic trade that does what each team would want but just would never happen.

    Houston gets: Sheed
    Atlanta gets: Antoine Walker, Los Rogers
    Portland gets: Hersey Hawkins, Dikembe Mutombo, future Chicago first rounder
    Chicago gets: Jermaine O'Neal, Walt Williams
    Boston gets: Bryce Drew, Dalibor Bagaric, future Houston first rounder

    The only questionable team is Boston, but from what I understand they are looking to unload Walker for low-priced players and draft picks so that they clear caproom for Croshere.



    ------------------
     
  3. IndianPlaya

    IndianPlaya Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2000
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    42
    There is no way any team would be stupid enough to trade Rasheed Wallace to keep Brian Grant. Grant is nowhere close to Wallace in talent, and Wallace has greater chances of improvement. Wallace is A LOT better, and i don't think Portland will trade him JUST to keep Grant.

    Da Franchise, I think you heard wrong.

    ------------------
     
  4. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    I just LOVE the old "we could have traded Pippen for Wallace, but Pippen opened his big mouth and ruined it" bit. First of all, Portland would've had to have been insane to have wanted to trade their best player and future for a past-his-prime small forward with back problems. Second, if other teams knowing you must unload a player supposedly lowers his trade value, how do you explain the Stoudamire-to-Houston situation? Everyone knew Toronto was going to trade Damon, yet the news leaking only led to BETTER offers from other teams, not worse ones.

    ------------------
    I Hate Every Bone in Your Body But Mine
     
  5. RichRocket

    RichRocket Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2000
    Messages:
    2,047
    Likes Received:
    2
    The difference between the Stoudamire situation and the Pippen situation is how many teams wanted Stoudamire versus how few teams wanted Pippen.

    Expressed disgruntlement by Pippen made us grateful that Portland still wanted him; we had to get rid of him.

    Toronto didn't have to get rid of Stoudamire; it was in their interest to do so. He didn't come with baggage. The likelihood of his leaving enlivened the bidding.

    ------------------
    There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count and those who can't.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now