1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is waiving Mike Harris the right move by Rox

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by NothingButNet, Oct 22, 2007.

Tags:
?

Is waiving Mike Harris the right move by Rox

Poll closed Oct 21, 2008.
  1. Yes we should waive him, we don't need his help for the team.

    133 vote(s)
    46.0%
  2. No this is the wrong move, Mike Harris belongs here.

    156 vote(s)
    54.0%
  1. Seven

    Seven Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,251
    Likes Received:
    28
    I don't think he's the type of player that would get a contract elsewhere. One of those guys that you must have one on the team, but too many is unnecessary. I'm sure he'll get signed, but I'm positive he'll get cut again.
     
  2. joliver325

    joliver325 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    5
    Havent gotten to watch the preseason like I wanted to. What is the big deal about Harris? Is he a rookie b/c if he is I thought Morris Almond was the big man on campus (Rice U)
     
  3. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    He was the cheapest, easiest player to cut. Beyond just the obvious fact that he isn't signed to an expensive multi-year deal and so is cut-able, cutting him saves a roster spot. That in itself is still about money, though. We certainly could have and would have signed Mike to a cheap 1 year deal with no qualms if the roster spot was available. But since it's not, had we still gone ahead with that route, that means we would have had to cut someone else who already IS making guaranteed money.

    I believe Morey has been and continues to try and find beneficial 2 for 1 or player for TE type trades to clear roster space and save money, but it isn't easy.

    It would have been great to keep Mike Harris and put him in the NBDL, but as already mentioned, you can't do that unless he makes the cut...so same salary cap / luxury tax implications.

    And, as "exciting" as Mike was, for every Azubuke, there are a bunch more scrubs who are never more than scrubs, or turn into Chuck Hayes' of the world, resigning with the original team they had practiced with. Mike could be back. Or not. Not a big deal either way.
     
  4. Dei

    Dei Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    7,362
    Likes Received:
    335
    He's 6'6 and plays PF. I would keep him if we let go of Chuck Hayes. Harris is nice, but we don't need him - that's what matters.
     
  5. candlegreen

    candlegreen Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    1,527
    Likes Received:
    55
    I think he was cut at this part of the preseason to allow ample time for him to find work somewhere else. I think the Rockets figure that he's not in their equation because of their bench, but they cut him early in order to allow him to find a roster somewhere.

    I think the Rockets did a very justifiable and honorable thing in this regards. I'm sure Harris appreciates his opportunity.
     
  6. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,985
    Likes Received:
    36,839
    New thread *maybe* not needed, given ongoing Harris discussions.

    I'm a Harris fan, but I'm not voting, given only two extreme options.

    I trust the coach and the management to weigh the cost/benefit of another contract that would probably have contributed about 5 minutes per game, max. I wish Harris all the best, and would have liked to keep him instead of some other guys, but I'm not all that upset.
     
  7. ThePrivate

    ThePrivate Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    939
    Likes Received:
    0
    Harris had no chance of making this team, team just too deep.
     
  8. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    I don't like your poll answers.

    Yes it was the right move to cut him.

    No I didn't want them to.
     
  9. Dei

    Dei Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    7,362
    Likes Received:
    335
    On another note, I would've taken Harris before Landry. I don't even know why Landry was signed.
     
  10. Ghettostar85

    Ghettostar85 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2001
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    36
    tough decision but someone had to go and in this case it was perhaps the best of the players who battled for a roster spot. On the other hand it was also the cheapest one to let go!
     
  11. thewaterox

    thewaterox Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,484
    Likes Received:
    5

    Yes I would have taken him a head of Landry, Novak, Snyder, Butler, and Lucas. This move was all about the money because these other guys have guaranteed contracts.
     
  12. foo82

    foo82 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    923
    Likes Received:
    31
    I'm one of the ones who have loved him to stay. But, I voted yes that he needed to be cut. He is the only person that would make economic sense to cut.
     
  13. The_Yoyo

    The_Yoyo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2001
    Messages:
    16,683
    Likes Received:
    2,873
    harris was a non-guaranteed contract that was really just brought into camp to take a look at, like jacobsen and haraysz was last year. i dont think he was going to make a team that needed cuts he was the only player the rockets could cut and not have to pay. financially it was the best move for the team. it was just a bad time, i am sure last year or the year before that he could have had a realistic shot to make the team and actually play..this year it would be extremely difficult.

    he may be signed again in the future if not he was able to give himself a shot and i am sure other teams may be looking at him too. harris plays 'bigger than his size' but we already have an overachieving undersized forward in hayes.

    i hope he is given a second chance though by another team.
     
  14. longbow111

    longbow111 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    0
    I vote no for obvious reasons.

    The return of SF3 and signing of Landry is 2 bad moves this offseason. They force the FO to do something they don't really wanna do.

    I think they cut Harris first to give him time for another job in other teams.

    Wish you good luck Mike Harris!
     
  15. Zboy

    Zboy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    27,234
    Likes Received:
    21,958
    This poll question seems to be right out of a RPG game...


    Can I come with you?

    No, I dont need your help, fool. I am Kobe wan Enobi!
    Yes, I need all the help I can get. Rafer is on my team.
     
  16. seaweed

    seaweed Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe all those players could help the rockets one way or another. It's really sad hearing anyone is cut. But still, the Rockets have to cut some five players. What I could do now is just believing in the manager and the coach, believing that they are doing everything they could to minimize the hurt to the team.
     
  17. v3.0

    v3.0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,203
    Likes Received:
    931
    you guys act like we cut the second coming of charles barkley...
     
  18. firezh

    firezh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Take it easy.

    He'll never get big mins if he stays.
    I don't think he's better than Justin Reed.
     
  19. deekay209

    deekay209 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    23
    Really man...what's done is done. Leave it alone. Morey obviously thought this was the right way to go. As much as I liked Harris, there was no place for him in this rotation.
     
  20. NewYorker

    NewYorker Ghost of Clutch Fans

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2002
    Messages:
    6,130
    Likes Received:
    41
    Harris wouldn't get much PT here anyway, and woudln't develop. Fact is, a team gunning for a ring doesn't have room for rookies or guys with a lot of potential.

    It won't surprise me if Landry gets cut or moved.
     

Share This Page