1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Fischer: Rockets interested in reaching long term deal with Fred VanVleet

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by OremLK, Jan 31, 2025.

?

Should the Rockets sign FVV to a long-term deal?

  1. Yes (at any semi-reasonable price)

    77 vote(s)
    28.7%
  2. Maybe (only on a team-friendly deal)

    136 vote(s)
    50.7%
  3. No

    55 vote(s)
    20.5%
  1. Furious Jam

    Furious Jam Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    1,576
    Fred is a 6th man on a championship-level team. If he's willing to accept corresponding pay and minutes, then sure you want to keep him.
     
    DaDakota, rockets1995, Boii and 3 others like this.
  2. Houston77

    Houston77 COOKIES AND CAKE, MY TEAM BAKED!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,656
    Likes Received:
    19,178
    I feel like people are a little unrealistic when it comes to this. FVV isn’t signing for like 2/40 or 3/50. At least, I seriously doubt it. Not that it matters much. We’ll be an over the cap team primarily concerned with signing our own players.
     
    Corrosion and sirjesse like this.
  3. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,070
    Likes Received:
    17,676
    I mean, I don't think FVV extends with us without at least two guaranteed years, unless it's close to max money, in which case why aren't we just picking up his team option? Sure, teams don't have a lot of cap space this season, but he can still probably score at least a three-year full MLE deal, and possibly more.
     
  4. Landry's Tooth

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2020
    Messages:
    4,253
    Likes Received:
    2,623
    I see it has a deal where FVV gets paid short term and Rockets get a tradeable contract who's good in the clubhouse...

    3 years, 75 million with each year a series of team options.... similar to Landale...

    Just in case some star we don't expect becomes available....
     
    Aruba77 likes this.
  5. lakersuck2

    lakersuck2 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    5,242
    I honestly wouldn't mind keeping Fred on a big deal that expires in 2027 because once the Jalen, Segun and maybe Jabari and Tari extensions kick in, we'll be close to the cap with iust those guys and so well have no way of adding star level talent without a trade. A trade would require salary matching as we'd be operating over the cap and having one guy on a huge expiring contract makes it easy enough to make the trade by just adding picks and rookie contracts.
     
  6. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    15,264
    Likes Received:
    18,470
    this is how I feel. Fred is a 6th man and that means Dillon money, not $30 mil per. Some of these salary takes are crazy to me. He’s being massively overpaid this year; im thinking 3yrs $70 mil on the extension.
     
    kspires999 and BallSoHarden like this.
  7. leroy

    leroy Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    27,306
    Likes Received:
    11,143
    This. What I've seen this year is a leader who's willing to be a facilitator and can transition to a scorer if/when needed. Last season, it was needed way more often than it has been this season. And going forward, I expect we will need him less as a scorer as the young bucks really start to dominate. He's the leader of this team and it's clear on the floor and in the huddle. There's a value to that which is greater than his shooting percentage.

    That said, it should certainly be at something well less than what he's making per season now.
     
    topfive likes this.
  8. Hank McDowell

    Hank McDowell Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2002
    Messages:
    7,275
    Likes Received:
    11,958
    That's the funniest thing I've seen in a while!
     
  9. xtruroyaltyx

    xtruroyaltyx Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    12,457
    Likes Received:
    15,885
    I don't think this has anything to do with Reed. 1st we don't know what numbers the Rockets are thinking about. There's no reason they couldn't re-sign Fred and then if Reed becomes a better option during Fred's contract move Fred to a bench role. Like when they signed Dillon to a 4 year deal... I don't think that meant they expected Dillon to be the starter here for 4 years because no young player was going to develop to be good enough to take his spot...

    Also, it makes sense financially to keep his his money on the books so they have salary to trade for a bigger fish down the road if they want to.
     
    robbie380 likes this.
  10. Rokman

    Rokman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    6,092
    Likes Received:
    7,139
    I think Fred is a great mentor for Reed and although Reed has severely underperformed during his NBA court time I still think he is considered the future PG here. It seems like that's not the case but I doubt it. I will say, Amen has turned into a Super Star and can literally play every position at an elite level. If they bolster the forward position he could turn into the full time PG which would leave Reed as part of the bench brigade as long as he is here.
     
  11. htownborn34

    htownborn34 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    498
    Likes Received:
    893
    Depends, are the Rockets confident enough in Amen and Reed to hold down the PG position going foward?

    As great as Amen has played I still have to question whether he’s ready to be the lead guard, and even if Reed is ready next season I still see him being no more than a guy playing 18-20 minutes a night.

    FVV may have questionable shot selection as a PG but he still has the veteran leadership and championship experience that you need on any team. I’m not against bringing him back but it has to be to a heavily reduced price from his last contract
     
  12. HI Mana

    HI Mana Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    1,036
    Fred is going to be 31 in the first year of a new extension. Let's look at some other comparables from recent history for rotation players on playoff teams:

    KCP (31): 3/$66M w/ PO, approximately 16% cap with slightly decreasing salary.

    CJ McCollum (32): 2/$64M, approximately 23.71% cap with decreasing salary.

    Tobias Harris (31): 2/$52M, approximately 18% cap with standard raises.

    Alex Caruso (30): 4/$81M, approximately 11% cap, max allowable extension.

    Somewhere between KCP and CJ seems like the actual market value for an extension for FVV. First thing I might consider is whether we really think it's worth doing; those deals for small guards on the wrong side of 30 are not aging well at all.

    Next thing I'd consider is the cap impact. I did a future cap analysis in another thread, but long story short, I would want to make sure to avoid paying luxury tax (exceeding 121% of the salary cap) until you crash through and become a 2nd apron team in 2027-2028 and 2028-2029 to avoid triggering the repeater rate when your payroll is at its highest. For your consideration, exceeding the tax in either 2025 or 2026 would increase the tax bill of a 2028-2029 team that spends up to the second apron by roughly $70M.

    If Fred is on this team in 2027 - 2028, he has to take the salary slot of either JSJ, Tari, or Whitmore. I'm not sure if I really want to be the 33-year old FVV business over any of those guys, or a potential external FA addition.

    I like Fred, and I think he has done a ton of heavy lifting for this team. But I liked his deal because it was short and flexible. Unless he takes a Caruso-level discount, I can only see this ending badly. Better to have someone leave a bit early while they're still good, than to extend them just to watch them decline and become overpaid on your bench.
     
    kspires999, Sonicbun8 and Shark44 like this.
  13. jb86

    jb86 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    730
    Fred is a backup pg on a championship team
     
  14. Dankstronaut

    Dankstronaut Way, way out here.

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    14,897
    Hopefully he considers 2 max years as some pre-payment. Because 3/60 and a backup role is the most they should offer.
     
    YaoMac09, Y2JT, GotGame15 and 2 others like this.
  15. Shark44

    Shark44 71er
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 1999
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    9,359
    If we can get Fred on a 2 year deal for between $56-$60M I think you do the deal. He's likely our starter going into next season and would hopefully transition to 6th man role later in 2025-26 season or at the beginning of 26-27 season. Beyond then I'd be fine if we extended him 1-2 years, but at a reduced salary. Not sure he would take that, but maybe by then we're really cooking and he doesn't want to leave our dynasty. :D
     
  16. carl_herrera

    carl_herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2023
    Messages:
    715
    Likes Received:
    1,909
    A three year full MLE is much worse for Fred than say 60/2 with a team option.

    FVV isn’t going to drop dead after the season. High AAV/short term maximizes his earning potential, his status in the league, and is his whole personal brand.

    Anyone thinking FVV is going to get $80 or $100M guaranteed over 2 or 3 years is missing the cap dynamics at play.

    The FO would probably prefer to just pick up the 2025-26 $45M team option or even let him walk vs giving out >$20M/yr guaranteed money in 2026-27 or later.

    There are zero non tanking teams with more than the MLE available this summer, and FVV is averaging 15 & 6 on 38% from the field. I love the guy, but 30M/yr on a 2-1 would be a big win for him.
     
    kspires999 likes this.
  17. pippendagimp

    pippendagimp Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2000
    Messages:
    27,748
    Likes Received:
    22,721
    $30M/yr for his production is obscene. would prefer to look elsewhere for a pg that can actually drive and make a layup
     
    Corrosion and Phillyrocket like this.
  18. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,520
    Likes Received:
    38,752
    Hell no, this would r****d the growth of the team.

    FVV is in decline he is a nice backup option but as a lead guard he is about at the end of his tether.

    DD
     
  19. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,299
    Likes Received:
    34,189
    It's always funny how little defense matters when fans talk about players.

    FVV means a lot to the Rockets on both sides of the ball. Udoka knows that, the assumption fans have that anybody can do what he does is so stupid.

    Team has done nothing but go up since he got here, and people act like he's along for the ride and not a huge part of our current record.
     
    AroundTheWorld and colorist like this.
  20. DatRocketFan

    DatRocketFan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2015
    Messages:
    12,662
    Likes Received:
    17,770
    while i think he has value and is a big reason for our current record, he was overpaid for 40 mill. He has multiple games where he just straight up put up less than double digit pts. if we are gonna extend him, it's gonna b at a discount
     

Share This Page