Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Which Would You Go With?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Lil Pun, Sep 17, 2003.

Tags:

Lil Pun Member

Joined:

Oct 6, 1999

Messages:

34,143

Likes Received:

1,038

Being a future Hall of Famer without a professional championship (Charles Barkley, Dan Marino)

OR.....

Being a professional champion that probably won't be a Hall of Famer (Pete Chilcutt, Shaun King)?

#1 Lil Pun, Sep 17, 2003

Manny Ramirez The Music Man

Joined:

Jul 31, 2001

Messages:

28,835

Likes Received:

5,755

1st one because when you die, your ring can be sold or buried with you, but your plaque will stay in the HoF forever.

Also, guys like Chilcutt and King were lucky that they got on a good team at the right time and that there were other guys who carried the team instead of them.

So essentially you are asking if you would rather be lucky or good?

I'll take good every day.

#2 Manny Ramirez, Sep 17, 2003
bnb Member

Joined:

Jul 7, 2002

Messages:

6,992

Likes Received:

316

An elite player....or a fringe player on a championship team?

I'd rather be the elite player.

#3 bnb, Sep 17, 2003
Maynard Member

Joined:

Aug 18, 2003

Messages:

575

Likes Received:

0

ill be any player on any team cuz then i'd be rich and i wouldnt care

#4 Maynard, Sep 17, 2003
JuanValdez Member

Joined:

Feb 14, 1999

Messages:

35,075

Likes Received:

15,253

If the money were the same, I'd take the championship ring.

#5 JuanValdez, Sep 17, 2003
GATER Member

Joined:

Jun 25, 2000

Messages:

8,325

Likes Received:

78

Superimposing my personal values upon the scenario...whichever position had the most economic advantage(s). Rich or famous? You can have the famous just give me the money.

#6 GATER, Sep 17, 2003

(You must log in or sign up to post here.)

Share This Page