Hunter Biden Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

What evidence? The e-mails that were reviewed by the WSJ and and had nothing linking Joe Biden to doing anything criminal?

Rudy G released the information he is aware of for political reasons....... if there was "more", Rudy G would already have release it as nearly half of Americans that will vote will have already done so by this weekend.

 

lulz, this is not new.
He already announced that in his presser that you already watched.

here is the video I posted yesterday (starting at where he announces he's in town for interview with Senate Committe members and FBI).

 

A Former Business Partner Alleges the Trumps Evaded Taxes in Panama
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/03/business/trump-panama-hotel-tax-evasion.html

See, it's easy

 

Wont be surprising if his story soon becomes that he 'believed' he was dealing with the Bidens but turn iyt to be some con/russian agent

 

I am glad you agree The ridiculousness of it all.

 

this really is foreplay. trumpers are on their iPads, one hand in pants...tucking in their shirts, one hands hitting refresh refresh refresh, hoping for that climactic moment... Cmon Rudy!! Give the people what they want! People are getting blue balls over here!!! NNNNGGGGAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!

(Wish I were tech smart enough to insert a gif or something here)

 

Yes... it is either crude foreplay with a street prostitute that won't tell you if she/he is a lady boy....... or if you want to be less crass, the art of seduction ........ but at the end of the day there isn't going to be anyone getting off or satisfied....

 

And I was explaining how an actual case of money laundering was being investigated (not your qanon-induced made up story)... must have flew right over your head...

 

Greg Sargent
@ThePlumLineGS
· 3h
Steve Bannon famously declared that Trump's strategy is to "flood the zone with ****." But now it turns out that Trump himself may be drowning in it. The big story right now is that on many fronts, Trump's magical lying powers are failing him. New piece: https://washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/10/23/trump-is-drowning-his-own-lies-heres-latest-sign-it/…
Show this thread

 

LOL You mean WaPo which is on Biden's team. Most of the outlets you see are on the Biden Wagon and openly spinning stories and framing narratives to get him elected. God you are really dumb. Forreal.

 

Yes conveniently all the sources that have pay walls, 100 + year reputations to uphold and are not beholden to ad revenue based click bait as their only source of revenue stream are on Biden's "camp".

 

Raise your hand if you are afraid of Russia like it's 1962.
If you don't give AF about Russia, congratulations on possessing a brain and a pair of balls.

 

You're only skeptical of things that don't agree with your world view...


Do you believe everything you read in the newspaper? Well... see the video I posted above.

 

I'm more worried about American disinfo from our social media tech overlords who hacked the election by censoring KEY stories that are vital to the future of our country. And the Army of spinsters that are working for the good of one side during an election who REFUSE to report a story from a neutral point.

 

I trust the credibility of pay wall sources that have 100+ years of reputation to uphold more so than sites that are entirely dependant on click bait and are entirely dependent on spreading one specific narrative as that is the sole reason why those sites were created.

Moderate Dems and liberals trust the news section of the WSJ and NYT equally even though they the WSJ is a conservstive leaning paper. Why? Because they aren't beholden to click bait ad revenue streams and they have too much reputation to uphold.

 

66 pages and no one is convinced to your view
you have 11 days left comrade , use them wisely

 

Pay walls don't make a source more credible... logical fallacy. They are just as likely to use click bait to get interest from the outside and to appeal to confirming the views of their readers and not challenging them. They also are likely to be beholden to the advertisers and those who own it. AKA your billionaires... even foreign countries that may buy ads.... oh and they are soft on the political establishment to continue getting access/routinely get in bed with sources... you are seriously out of your depth on this topic; that is clear.

 

Yeah him being there was a real laugh riot.

 

Pay walls definitely do. You need to understand what motivates sources to spread click baity headlines and weakly sourced material.

If there was analytics data that showed the percentage of people who click on NYT stories and actually scroll to the bottom meaning they probably read the entire article vs the same with a site like the Federalist or whatever right wing rag you follow, which one do you think is going to have a larger percentage of consumers reading entire articles?

 

You are right but I have to think either got paid or thought he would get paid.

I mean that goes for most of these enablers at least that's the only thing that makes any sense.