1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Cost of moving Anderson ?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by snowconeman22, Jun 21, 2017.

  1. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,889
    Likes Received:
    20,037
    So you clear capspace so you can take on more cap? Clearing capspace means you pay a price or give assets to do so, they do that and then immediately fill their cap again with bad contracts for assets? So they lose assets to clear cap and then take on more bad contracts to get assets, that puts them in the same situation they were before and that makes no sense.

    They drafted their big men because its BPA, if they wanted to develop their big men straight up why get so many at the same position? You can only develop 1-2 guys at each spot, there isn't enough pt to play them all. They just wanted to get 1-2 of the best and then trade the other guys because when these guys outgrow there rookie contracts they wont be able to pay them all.
     
  2. kjayp

    kjayp Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,950
    Likes Received:
    7,758
    You must be mistaken... I'm sure lars had plenty of statistical information and maybe even some advanced analytics that proved his opinion was obviously correct... lol
     
  3. malakas

    malakas Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    20,167
    Likes Received:
    15,381
    Pay a price or give assets...what price exactly they had to pay to clear cap? 2/3 of their roster is on rookie contracts. Letting Afflalo go was price? They didn't have to eat any salary AFAIK?
    So they didn't lose any assets to have clear cap so they can take back assets to eat bad salaries. That's ofc if they aren't completelly r****ded.

    Nope, they drafted all those guys because more young players means more shots at getting a star. That's what rebuilding teams do. If they trade them later that's a different story. But without giving minutes and developing, these young players won't have any trade value anyway to bring anything good back.
     
  4. rocketsballin

    rocketsballin Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,041
    Likes Received:
    1,483
    the cost of moving ryan anderson is yo mama house
     
  5. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,889
    Likes Received:
    20,037
    We're agreeing on these points so not sure why you are arguing with me. Sac are rebuilding but if they're gonna take salary why not get a semiuseful player like Anderson instead of total trash who won't help the team win? They have gotten lots of prospect big men but those guys they got don't complement each other, these are all projected to be centers so a guy like Anderson who is a vet and a shooter can be of use to that team. He can even help the team into the playoffs esp. if Hield or their picks this year blow up they got a ton of good players in the draft.

    Of course Sacramento won't take Anderson for nothing, Houston has to pay the price which is why I said Morey has his work cut out for him. But they are still a logical dumping target nonetheless.
     
    malakas likes this.
  6. malakas

    malakas Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    20,167
    Likes Received:
    15,381
    oh lol ok. I thought you meant they will trade for him for free. If the price is right imo they could take him.
    Morey doesn't have that many options anyway. Minny is also a good one.
     
  7. TMAC3

    TMAC3 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    520
    Likes Received:
    153
  8. MorningZippo

    MorningZippo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,310
    Likes Received:
    2,590
    This thread is hilarious. Pay Ryan Anderson his market value, then he actually stays healthy the entire season, yet his value is lower than before?

    Then you have other morons who actually think the wolves could attract a free agent with cap space, even though they never have, and never will. If you think the wolves wouldn't take Ryan Anderson for free, then nothing else you think is going to make sense either.
     
  9. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    15,284
    Likes Received:
    18,517

    so you think we can find a taker for anderson without giving up an asset or taking on a bad contract in return?

    I hope you are right. I'd be shocked. i think we are going to find out this off-season
     
    JohnMac82 likes this.
  10. ashleyem

    ashleyem Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,133
    Likes Received:
    8,430
    If nobody takes Ryno, we could stretch his contract to 7 years and that should open up 11M extra cap space.
     
  11. Vivi

    Vivi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2016
    Messages:
    18,561
    Likes Received:
    20,774
    This is not going to happen though.
     
  12. t0mdotcom

    t0mdotcom Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,643
    Likes Received:
    276
    Morey already has something lined up. Yes, Andersons contract isn't great, but a true stretch 4 is hard to come by. There aren't many true stretch 4s out there, so you have to overpay for the ones that you can get. He still shot 40% from 3 in the regular season.
     
  13. t0mdotcom

    t0mdotcom Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,643
    Likes Received:
    276
    You wouldn't take a bad contract in return. If that was the case, why move Anderson?
     
  14. zeeshan2

    zeeshan2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2013
    Messages:
    55,455
    Likes Received:
    65,178
  15. bilaal14

    bilaal14 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,168
    Likes Received:
    3,118
    Knew this scrubs contract was going to be toxic at the beginnning of last year... hardly anyone ever listened. Now it is going to cost us some significant assets to dump this sorry fool. Unless morey has something up his sleeves, or a FA team wants to do a sign and trade, we are going to have to part with something of high value to get this crap off of our books. UGH
     
  16. dfbreyes

    dfbreyes Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2001
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    435
    time to call batman

    [​IMG]

    he's not picking up....Inspector O'Hara, quick...send the bat alert

    [​IMG]
     
  17. snowconeman22

    snowconeman22 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    14,488
    Likes Received:
    16,403
    What now !?

    Can we move him ?

    Can we sign Hayward ? Trade for PG ? Griffin ?
     
  18. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    113,912
    Likes Received:
    175,273
    Zach Lowe:

    Unloading Ryan Anderson to sign Paul outright would have helped Houston keep one of their outgoing guards, but the market for the three years and $60 million left on Anderson's deal was frigid. Not even the Kings wanted him for free. At least two teams would have demanded two Houston first-round picks in exchange for absorbing Anderson, according to several league sources.
     
    malakas likes this.
  19. malakas

    malakas Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    20,167
    Likes Received:
    15,381
    LOL at those saying "oh teams will take Anderson without even a sweetener"
    We got our answer tonight. 2 first rounders!!!

    And to think that some ppl don't want to trade him for Melo..:rolleyes:
     
  20. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,202
    Likes Received:
    4,140
    So... if we assume we would have given Lou Williams for free (maybe gotten a 2nd round pick) to make cap space, and the 2018 first is gone either way...

    Ryan Anderson
    MLE for use
    BAE
    2020 first round pick

    vs.

    Beverley
    Sam Decker
    Maybe Trezl / Wiltjer

    Puts the decision to make the trade in context...
     

Share This Page