Why Restricting Guns & Magazines in NOT the Answer

Everyone needs to own a 3D printer.

 

Not in all gun sales. Private sellers are not required to perform background checks.

 

Well that is where I'm on your side but not in anything else you propose.

 

At least that is a start.

 

I don't think a single ICBM has been sold on the black market.

 

An ICBM is just the vehicle for a nuclear weapon but you know that.

 

Its easy to point out a problem OP......what is your solution (excuse me if you have already provided it.)

 

A vehicle whose primary purpose is deterrence. We have come full circle.

 

I actually agree with you about the main thing that needs to be done.

 

No, like I said legislation that will reduce some of the deaths is okay with me, even if other things need to be done to address the larger issue.

If I'm having an operation to address the main cause of my pain, I don't mind taking aspirin or pain medication to deal with some of the symptoms in the mean time.

 

Again, that's going to happen unless I get the operation no matter what. If that's going to happen, addressing the symptoms is a good thin, and certainly not a bad one. I'm in favor of getting the operation that will remove the cancer, but while I'm waiting for that, I prefer to be in less pain from the symptoms.

 

Awesome technology. Thanks for posting.

A red herring in the gun control debate.

 

Bottom line is firing a gun in rapid fire makes Supernut's weiner tingle and he would intentionally break the Law if it makes his tingle Berries feel good, You sound like a drug addict justifying his habit.

 

The same people who are desperate to keep guns around also want to have less money devoted to things you're talking about. And those who want to put some control on guns also advocate such things. Republicans have put laws in place to prevent the ATF and other government agencies from going in depth in trying to root out the problems. They also want to cut costs to agencies that police or help those living in areas of high levels of violence.

So from a practical standpoint, you're either going to have gun control along with other measures to help the high-risk civilians, or it's basically no control on anything. Unfortunately, that's what happens when one side never compromise nor give a flip about solving problems.

So serious crimes rate has gone up with advancing technology throughout the world? This doesn't sound right on the surface. Is there data that support this?

I agree with the war on drugs though. Although like I said above, the people who would never support legalization of drugs are also the ones who would never spend a dime more than they have to on education and helping the needy.