1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

What position(s) is more important to win an NBA Championship? PG or PF/C

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by ebatinga, Oct 15, 2010.

  1. ebatinga

    ebatinga Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    5
    Let me begin by saying I did not include SG or SF in my question just because I know how important that position is to win (aka Kobe, Jordan) and while I'm not discounting the importance of the wing position, I was wondering what position would be MORE important when comparing the point guard position and the big man position (power forward and/or center).

    I thought to myself, when was the last time a GREAT point guard actually led his team to a championship in recent since the early 1990's and I can't think of one point guard who actually led his team to a championship (NOTE: my discussion does not include wing players). Sure you could say that Tony Parker helped with SA, but he had Duncan (and wing player Manu), Rajon with Boston, but he had Garnett (and Pierce) and Chauncy with Detroit, but he had Rip and Prince.

    If you were to look at it (I don't have statistics, so I'm basing my assumption off what I've seen and some logic) I don't think a lot of those teams (Not including the Bulls w/ Jordan) and (Kobe with the Lakers), that the big man appears to be more important.

    Even with Kobe, the first set of championships, he had Shaq and the recent ones, he has Pau. I'm not discounting that Kobe is not great because he can arguably go down as the best player not named Jordan, but you have to think of how the big man in Shaq and Pau made things so much easier for him to score and take over big games. Even when Wade won, he had Shaq making things easier for him.

    That's why I think the big man is more important than the pg in terms of a potential championship. I know there are exceptions to the rule, but I'm talking about from a general standpoint.

    Thoughts?
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. ebatinga

    ebatinga Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    5
    FIXED: I don't think a lot of those teams would have been as successful in winning a champions(Not including the Bulls w/ Jordan) and (Kobe with the Lakers), so it seems that.....
     
  3. BrooksBall

    BrooksBall Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    20,568
    Likes Received:
    256
    I created a very similar topic a few months ago but included the wing positions and phrased my question differently.

    http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=185946

    I very much agree with your theory. I think that the importance of the PG position is vastly overrated by a lot of fans, even with the current set of defensive rules.
     
  4. rockets934life

    rockets934life Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    15,312
    Likes Received:
    249
    Power Foward/Center...the only team that has been able to win a title without a dominant big man in the last 20 years were the Bulls and well...they had the greatest of all time at the SG position.

    Rox - Dream
    Spurs - Duncan/Robinson
    Lakers - Shaq/Gasol/Healthy Bynum
    Pistons - Rasheed/Ben
    Heat - Shaq
    Celtics - Garnett
     
  5. johnstarks

    johnstarks Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,505
    Likes Received:
    65
    This is it. You need a two way low post presence to win if you don't have the services of the GOAT. End discussion. Lock this thread up...
     
  6. Steve_Francis_rules

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 1999
    Messages:
    8,467
    Likes Received:
    300
    Who is the last point guard to lead a team to a championship? Isiah Thomas?

    I think this is a pretty easy question.
     
  7. MiracleShot

    MiracleShot Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,607
    Likes Received:
    477
    Fixed :grin: :grin:
     
  8. RV6

    RV6 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    PF/C, because these guys do a lot more to contribute and it's hard for other positions to pick up the slack in these areas( mainly rebounding/blocks), if their PF/C sucks.

    At the PG position, you can definitely make up for ther scoring, rebounding, shooting, steals, etc....the assists part is the hard one, but is easier to replace with a good offense or a Kobe/MJ who your offense is running through.
     
  9. DaDakota

    DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    124,125
    Likes Received:
    33,011
    I don't think it matters.

    Magic and Isaih led from the PG spot.
    MJ led from the SG spot
    Bird led from the SF/PF spot
    Hakeem led from the C spot.

    There is more than one way to skin a cat.

    Now that being said, I think the new rules favor the perimeter players....so....maybe it has skewed more towards PG and SG/SF.

    DD
     
  10. YaoZow

    YaoZow Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    12
    I think it's about talent more than anything about a specific position.

    You have to have serviceable players at all positions to win.

    Like you can say Kobe is winning now because he has Pau. But you could also say Kobe was losing before because Kwame Brown, Smush Parker & Luke Walton were starters. Only Lamar Odom was a decent player outside of Kobe. You can't win with that.

    Celtics of 2008 had 3 All Stars +1 Rondo + 1 Perkins

    Spurs had Duncan, Manu, Tony Parker, so they had it fully covered.

    Detroit Pistons had 4 All Stars.

    3 Peat Lakers had two legit Superstars (Shaq/Kobe)

    Jordan had crappy Centers (Wennington, Longley), but great dudes at the other positions (Rodman, Kukoc, Pippen, Kerr)

    Hakeem had an A Lister in Clyde + solid dudes like Kenny, Horry, Cassell
     
  11. Francis 4 ever

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    755
    Likes Received:
    19
    The scoring can come from anywhere, but the a interrior defensive player is a must. I can't think of a single champion without a dominant force down low defensively.


    Hell I'm hard pressed to think of a conference champ without one. maybe that dallas team
     
  12. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    46,826
    Likes Received:
    18,545
    Big men win rings.

    Kobe had a ton of help from Gasol.

    Garnett, Shaq, Duncan.

    The playoff become a half court game and Big Men rule the half court.
     
  13. JayGoogle

    JayGoogle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    50,214
    Likes Received:
    40,933
    Pretty much. No one way to win a title.

    Also how can we say big men only win titles? Duncan had Parker and Manu. WE can't just toss them aside.

    Also Billups was a big reason for his championship in Detroit.

    It's really more about how much talent you have on top of team chemistry.
     
  14. rockets934life

    rockets934life Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    15,312
    Likes Received:
    249
    Duncan/Robinson won a title without Manu/Parker, until those two win it without Duncan...

    The Pistons were nice but didn't become legit till they traded for Rasheed.

    Shaq left the Lakers and they became also rans and the Heat won a title with a healthy Shaq, they were 1st rd poop without him being healthy.

    Kobe was, as mentioned above, an also ran till Gasol and then Bynum came aboard.
     
  15. txppratt

    txppratt Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,984
    Likes Received:
    296
    like DD said, you can win with all different kinds of team. in the past, players from every position have led their team to an NBA championship.

    having said that... i agree with you that skilled big men are harder to come by than a PG. i would say having an excellent PF/C gives you a greater edge overall in the NBA.

    the taller and more skilled you are, the more rare your talent is... and the greater the advantage for the team you are on.
     
  16. TriumVirate

    TriumVirate Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,155
    Likes Received:
    2,978
    Bill Russell.
     
  17. Dave_78

    Dave_78 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,809
    Likes Received:
    373
    PF/Center mostly for defensive reasons.
     
  18. napalm06

    napalm06 Huge Flopping Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,375
    Likes Received:
    29,540
    Every team that has ever won a championship has had players playing all 5 positions.
     
  19. Lynus302

    Lynus302 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    6,382
    Likes Received:
    199
    You cannot discount the importance of Ho Grant and Rodman to the Bulls two three-peats.

    The "Bad Boy" Pistons had Rodman and Bill Laimbeer.

    Even PG Magic Johnson jumped center his rookie year in the finals (Kareem was hurt) and dumped 40+ on whoever it was they were playing.

    Point is: you don't win without a big man, period.
     
  20. danoman

    danoman Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,769
    Likes Received:
    728
    Quality big men
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now