State Department misled on Hillary Clinton emails, investigation concludes

I think this is a fascinating case study, just absolutely fascinating.

Assuming this isn't a troll, and he is sincere...how do people fall so far into these contrived realities? Is it just low intelligence combined with perpetual propaganda. Is it just inherent racism? How does this happen? Honestly feel bad for him. Really unfair, if it's not by choice, that he has live like this.

 

Not gonna start a new thread for this, but here's the legacy of overthrowing Gadafi:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Yau5y5vZXZs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

You're the one talking about a right wing conspiracy, not me. Just more nuggets of bullsh!t your pundits tossed out and you swallowed without question.

 

While in office, the dubya supporters were both blind as a bat and unwaveringly supportive. Perhaps you're not old enough to remember, but this forum has a large archive of people like bigpuffery acting like the sycophants that your pundits have convinced you that Obama supporters are.

I fully believe it was before you were politically aware, but it is a bit sad that you only became politically aware when Obama took office.

 

That one made me chuckle, you're the one who believes inaccurate spin, as a rule.

Except that Obama is nothing close to a "far left ideologue." On issue after issue, he showed willingness to compromise with Republicans, to a fault in a few cases. On the ACA, for instance, single payer was never even on the table as a consideration. A "far left ideologue" would have at least started from a "single payer is our solution" position and negotiated from there, but Obama is nothing of the sort, he is a slightly left of center moderate, no matter how many times your pundits repeat the tripe you posted.

I think you're forgetting (or weren't aware in the first place) the high levels of support the American people had for Bush early in his presidency, particularly after 9/11. The "level of bile" you mention didn't come until much later, after the invasion of Iraq.

There is a large difference between opposition that began as venomous and vitriolic from day one and opposition that is based on policy issues and failures.

 

You are just wallowing on Bullsh!t mountain.

You're ignoring all of the times that Obama put a hand out to try and bring Republicans into the negotiations and conversations around policy, only to be rebuffed at every turn. Go back and look at the summit on healthcare if you'd like to consume some truth on the subject (I know, the truth isn't your wheelhouse, you'd rather be spoon-fed lies that agree with your ideological bias).

If the Republican president were willing to similarly seek middle ground say by allowing for some tax increases to accompany the spending cuts to reduce or eliminate the deficit and pay down the debt, then yes, I think that Democrats would negotiate, as they did repeatedly with Bush the lesser, Bush the elder, and Reagan.

Yes, but it isn't Obama pushing for things that are non-starters (like repeal of the ACA ).

 

This from the guy who supports a party whose presidential candidates were making comments about the Obama gun speech days before it was actually delivered. I guess that previsionist BS is much better than looking back with the benefit of hindsight.

 

here's Hillary instructing a subordinate to remove classified markings and send over an unsecure line

this is super illegal and explains why she is under FBI investigation

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Whoa: Hillary e-mail instructs aide to transmit classified data without*markings <a href="https://t.co/kzlrnWbYDA">https://t.co/kzlrnWbYDA</a> <a href="https://t.co/dH4UiA2S9Z">pic.twitter.com/dH4UiA2S9Z</a></p>&mdash; Ed Morrissey (@EdMorrissey) <a href="https://twitter.com/EdMorrissey/status/685476449260732417">January 8, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

So super illegal that she has yet to be charged after 2+ years.

 

To be fair that can be easily retorted with: "She is in a position of power and influence. People in a position of power and influence don't get prosecuted as often."

 

hilary lucky she's not black. would have been beaten and arrested by now.

 

Her husband was charged with a crime while he was POUTS, for getting a blowjob. I was 13 when that happen.

The day he was charged was the day the Republican party forever lost Cohete Rojo.

 

for perjury in a sexual harassment deposition (for which he lost his law license)

 

that's an expensive blowjob

 

Actually lying under oath is a big problem. Especially when one is entrusted with the job of POTUS.

 

Because no one cares about a witch hunt.