1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Should Morris replace 2Pat at the starting 4?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by spdngyns69, Dec 20, 2012.

  1. RV6

    RV6 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    Morris can get that 15-16 footer almost every time, but i think his shooting form allows for a better banker from there. He should try it.
     
  2. cytrynowa

    cytrynowa Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    20
    Yeah. Maybe I'm imagining it but the chemistry seems pretty bad btw Patterson and others.
     
  3. larsv8

    larsv8 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,914
    Patterson should start, as he is the most polished and consistent of the four PFs on the team.

    His help defense blows the others out of the water and the myth about his rebounding has been debunked now that Morris (a good rebounder) has shown the down numbers are more about the system the Rockets run, rather than the player.

    The other three have more upside, but just aren't ready yet. Morris is the most ready but is more of a three than a four.
     
  4. spdngyns69

    spdngyns69 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    79
    Agree that long term, MM is more well suited at the 3. It's unfortunate that TJ and DM games are too raw at the moment. But you take what can help the team now. I'd say Rockets should give MM at least ten games.

    My problem with Patterson is not with his defense but with offense mostly. He doesn't have the skills to play like a true PF with his back to the basket and he isn't good enough playing outside either. You can't really draw a play successfully for Ppat. Not saying MM has a better post up game, but at least you have a guy who knows how to play outside like a combo sf/pf. The spots that MM pick happens to create better spacing on the floor for the other guys too.

    I would rather have 2 good sized SF (Parsons,MM) playing at the same time than a PF who cant play like one and isn't quite good enough to play like a SF which seems like what they are trying to do with him.

    IDK, I just really hate how Ppat plays hot potato with the ball. The minute a defender closes in on him, he would jack it up or flip one up at a blink of an eye. It's like the dude is scared of contact or getting blocked. He got no moves!
     
  5. Naija Texan

    Naija Texan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    55
    He already is, but frankly speaking, it wouldn't hurt.

    They both seem to play the same amount of defense and hustle. Patrick has longer limbs but Marcus seems more active. Marcus doesn't seem to take as many shots unless open but Patrick pretty much doesn't have the ball skills to do anything but jack the ball up when it comes to him.

    Ultimately, it will depend on Patrick Patterson once he recovers and Marcus Morris while he has the chance to start, who will be the better starter.
     
  6. BeeBeard

    BeeBeard Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,966
    Likes Received:
    113
    So what is the timetable for Patterson's return, anyway?

    Has there been any new news on that front?
     
  7. cyclorider

    cyclorider Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Messages:
    518
    Likes Received:
    11
    Morris is barely 6'8", does not rebound, has short arms and can not defend anybody.

    I'd stick with the 6'9" Patterson for now and tell him to start rebounding or else.
     
  8. just a word

    just a word Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    39
    I posted this upthread but it bears repeating:

    http://www.82games.com/1213/1213HOU2.HTM

    Lin, Harden, Parsons, Asik + Patterson = -34
    same but with Morris = +11

    Those are team +/- numbers. Just by switching out Patterson for Morris, the team swings 45 points in the positive direction.
     
  9. just a word

    just a word Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    39
    sorry, typo
     
  10. Aleron

    Aleron Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    11,685
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    It's hard to really pin that when the Patterson combo has okc, miami, sa, mem, la on the list, and the morris combo has tor, nyk, phi.
     
  11. JJ23

    JJ23 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Messages:
    807
    Likes Received:
    13
    PPat is only 23 with upside....why are so many ppl so quick to dismiss him? LOL. Is it because he plays soft?
     
  12. just a word

    just a word Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    39
    That's one way to put it.

    Another way. The only thing that this team is missing for optimal synergy is a PF who either:
    a) can shoot the 3 and gets about 8 rebounds per game (a 5-type)
    OR
    b) can defend really well and get about 8 rebounds per game (a 10-type)

    The Rockets have, or are developing, all the other duo's and trios in their starting lineup: Harden (2, sometimes 8), Lin (7, sometimes 2), Parsons (8, sometimes 2), Asik (12 on a good offensive day)

    (Interestingly, by the paper, the easiest way for Lin to modify his playing to work best with Harden is if Lin plays like a high scoring, facilitating SG.:grin:)
     
  13. carayip

    carayip Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    20
    ^ Are you suggesting Lin should learn to play more selfish like Westbrook (without Westbrook's insane athleticism to boot)?!
     
  14. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    23,939
    Likes Received:
    14,010
    That difference is roughly about 15 points difference per 48 minutes using the latest nba.com stats. I will say it is a small sample size. If the trend that the Morris lineup continues to win by 0.2 points per minute on average for another 4 or 5 games versus their opponent, the job is Morris's to defend.
     
  15. just a word

    just a word Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    39
    Cluster-2 players tend to be guards (usually SG's) who have 21 PPG, 4 AST, 17 FGA, among other misc stats. Playing two cluster2's together has a positive influence on the team, with one exception: if there's a cluster7-type player. (ie. 2-2-7 lineups are bad)

    Cluster-7 are high assist, high scoring, high turnover PG's; the tricky part of this is that Parsons sometimes looked like a Cluster-2. So basically when Harden-Parson-Lin is playing like they're 2-2-7 (two high scoring medium assist players with a high assist high scoring high turnover PG), the team does worse. I THINK this might be negated by Lin playing like a 2 as well.

    OR Chandler can just play as a cluster-8 (16 PPG, 4.5 AST, 13 FGA, glue guy usually at the 3), because 7-8-12 is disproportionally good for the team. Asik, when he's scoring around 20PPG, is a 12.

    Again, this team has ridiculous synergy potential, if you go by that paper, and the only player they're missing from the starters is a PF with 8 rebounds per game that is either a stretch 4 or a defensive specialist.
     
  16. Big Red Machine

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    7
    Neither is likely in the future plans. At this point, I would like to see Jones and Motiejunas getting significant playing time (even if it comes at the expense of a couple of wins). I think those players actually have starter potential. Morris, if he improves on his weaknesses might have a chance, because this is essentially his rookie season. He eclipsed the number of minutes he played last season during the Miami game last month. Patterson has proven to be injury prone and limited as a player. If Morris could show more SF-like ability, he could stick around as Parsons' backup, but I like Jones and Motiejunas as the future at the 4.

    If Morris doesn't start developing as more of a hybrid forward that has distinct SF traits, I'd just rather see both guys packaged for a veteran SF with an expiring contract or short-term deal to come off the bench. Someone like Richard Jefferson who isn't playing much in GS and only has one year left on his deal after this season. The FA pool isn't that strong this offseason anyway.

    And we also have Royce White as a major wild card in all of this. His potential, on the court, far exceeds either player. Hopefully all will be well once he actually makes it onto the court. If he makes it onto the court....
     
  17. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    PF's on our roster: ppat, jones, dmo
    Forwards that can play some time at the 4 for smaller lineups: Morris, parsons, white if he ever shows

    Almost all our rookies are bigs or tweeners. Right now we're a development team for Forwrds with too many to spread minutes around for. Best thing to do is develop ppat for a trade which means playing him more minutes when you can. Do the same for the rest until you find a starter/backup that fits long term and basically be a farming system for the others until we're in contention.
     
  18. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    23,939
    Likes Received:
    14,010
    White is very wide and strong. He won't get pushed around at the 4. He is not a three. He is not a tweener. Jones, White, and DMo all have good size for the 4. Jones may be able to play some 3, but that is based on his athletism and not because he is a tweener.

    Morris is slightly on the small side for a 4 and the only true tweener. Parsons is a three that can play 4 if a mismatch is present.
     
  19. NotApollo33

    NotApollo33 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,366
    Likes Received:
    35
    I'm sorry but if you're not talented than at least hussel on Defense and Rebound by putting your body out there. I remember Dennis Rodman, however athletic he is of course is up for debates, but a guy at 6'5 defends Shaq as well as pgs, rebounds like a machine and hussels like one. We don't need an all star scorer at the 4, but we do need a huge defensive presence. Its just hardwork really.
     
  20. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    24,455
    Likes Received:
    14,736
    I think it's pretty obvious by now Morris is so much better than Ppat at the starting line up. This shouldn't be the case (Ppat has Al Horford's body while Morris is like Paul Pierce/Metta with short arms), but Morris is so much more aggressive and active than Ppat. At the very least, he's not getting vastly outrebounded by the pg every single game (lol).

    I guess PP's better at positional defense, but MM gives out more effort and has a better "SF" skillset. This allows the rox to provide spacing and give Lin and Harden the room they need to attack the basket.

    Personally, I'd trade Pp for picks and just start MM at the four, with TJones playing backup SF and Dmo playing backup PF.
     
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now