Russians have compromising Trump sex tape and financial info

Y'all, Russia said they don't collect information on foreign leaders. It's settled!

 

Sorry for the double post, browser freaked out.

 

Pretty amazing to see all the people who "did not vote" for Trump defend him like he is their king, LOL.

 

Its just insane the left continues to double down on their ignorance time and time again. Hillarys email server scandal was a non issue. Plans to sink Bernie was a non issue since he lost anyways. DNC colluding with media is a non issue, since Hillary lost. The lefts media pets get duped, posts news stories which are completely unverified, more unethical behavior, and the left still stays its a non issue because Trump is black mail proof.

ZOMG! Russia releases corrupt and unethical behavior and Trump is now bought and owned by Putin. Don't forget fake news! Fake news is only acceptable if it comes from your side.

The left is STILL looking for dirt on Trump. The best the came up with is 'grab them by the p***y'. Since when is it acceptable to call the first lady a prostitute? The left actually believes Trump and Russian prostitutes pissing on a bed? The guy is a billionaire. If he was this sloppy with his reputation, we would have a lot more than p***y grabbing stories.

This is just willful ignorance by the extreme left.

 

Let the hate flow through child who just discovered skeptism.

 

Who is this 4chan person?

 

Why would the Russians pass up such a golden opportunity.

 

Ah, the golden age of "Fake News" is still in effect. Well done.

 

Shouldn't a sad Pepe accompany this thread at some point? Smoke and mirrors, but has trump tweeted about yet? That's the real question: what does the Tweeter-in-chief have to say about what people are saying?

 

What exactly needs to be defended? I haven't seen a lot of people defending Trump, only exposing the lefts insanity and unwillingness to accept Trump as their president. The left has gone full r****d. Never go full r****d.

Here is some Trump hugging for you:
His administration picks: I am going to be honest, I know little to nothing about them. If I were a liberal, I would know everything about them, but unfortunately I dont blindly follow my own echo chamber and become overnight experts on every subject matter I read in my preferred information source. I'll defer to you guys and your Buzzfeed and CNN sources.

The Wall: Its stupid. All off it. A waste of time and money and nothing more than political posturing. But at least I get to keep my doctor, right?
Hillary Prosecution: It was funny and a very nice off the cuff jab. But again, another stupid thing and more political posturing. But at least my healthcare costs are going down and I have a better network of doctors.

 

Statements like this crack me up. So Trump getting elected is somehow the fault of the Democrats but not the millions of idiots who actually voted for him? But hey, keep on blindly defending anything and everything related to this person who you supposedly didn't vote for and don't like.

 

I think Russia hacked you.

 

I don't know exactly, but I do know he's Russian. In fact, the news keeps me so aware about the bad evil Russians that I think the Russians killed the Wham dude and Princess Leigh. Those Russians are evil beings. Born evil with a desire to conquer and rule the world!

 

Man, it's almost as if I can brush off any cause for concern by greatly exxagerting a claim.

Don't worry, this is the extent of intellectual discourse I expect from you. So it's not like you are disappointing me.

 

They merely sought to gain influence over my profile and undermine the credibility of the BBS as a whole.

 

As easy as you brush off irresponsible journalism and outright propaganda from our own trusted American media.

 

Name a source you trust.

 

I'll give a bit of credit to the NYT (whos editor has admonished their own staff personal tweets recently, took guts and got hit hard) who refused to publish the document but did publish an explanation why.

In a brief interview in the Times newsroom on Tuesday evening, Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The Times, said the paper would not publish the document because the allegations were “totally unsubstantiated.”

“We, like others, investigated the allegations and haven’t corroborated them, and we felt we’re not in the business of publishing things we can’t stand by,” Mr. Baquet said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/10/business/buzzfeed-donald-trump-russia.html?_r=0

Meanwhile Buzzfeed, CNN, and the rest are working on their next story which came from an anonymous source who got it from their anonymous source.

 

please ban OP for this fake news.

 

I'm glad the NYT isn't publishing the story, but I lol at Trumpettes criticizing someone for publishing unsubstantiated rumors when Trump heraled stories reported in the National Enquirer, repeated rumors that could only be found on anonymous blogs, etc. and hid behind "I'm not saying it, look this is what people are saying I'm just repeating it" and who has held onto conspiracy theories debunked by every credible news agency such as the birther movement and the vaxxed movement.