It won't be interesting with either because the Warriors will crush both teams. I do think the Pels have a chance to win a game.
Sure plays probably just about as harder than anyone in the league but this dude is a clown thinking he alone can beat a five man lineup night in and night out, even with that garbage team and coach
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>More I see Westbrook's 16th tech, more I think it'll be rescinded and that he'll be allowed to play tomorrow night.</p>— Skip Bayless (@RealSkipBayless) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealSkipBayless/status/587427338842939392">April 13, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Can someone prove the arguement that averaging the same amount of points for less games actually benefits the team more or is more efficient than doing it for 14-15 games longer? Maybe in terms of math
ignorance. 54 pts on 41 shots with only 2 turnovers is not inefficient. he has had different games where you can claim that but today wasn't one of them.