1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Rockets the new NBA model?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by rmartine, Jan 1, 2010.

  1. rmartine

    rmartine Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    6
    Interesting read mentions the Rockets and Morey's stats driven model as an example of a new NBA era.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?columnist=adande_ja&page=Decade-100101

    What the NBA has learned this decadeComment Email Print Share By J.A. Adande
    ESPN.com



    ChinaFotoPress/Getty Images
    Bigger is better? Maybe earlier in the decade. Ask Hummer owners or NBA teams what they think now.


    When I think of how the nation changed this decade, I consider the cars in my town, and I think back to the day several years ago when I saw a Hummer with a personalized license plate that claimed "8 MPG" -- as if the owner were proud of eradicating the earth's natural resources one block at a time. I thought of that guy when gas prices hit $4 a gallon, and wondered whether he still felt that way, or whether he begged for mercy and swapped his Hummer for a Prius. Even if he didn't, enough others felt that way to drop Hummer sales by 85 percent this year.

    The NBA, just like the rest of America, is capable of learning, even if it sometimes requires a good deal of error amid the trials. This was the decade we discovered that gas-devouring SUVs aren't so cool when you're paying $4 a gallon at the pump, we learned not to throw all of our investment dollars in a company just because it had dot-com in the name, we found out that green-lighting mortgages for homeowners already deep in debt isn't such a bright idea, and the NBA realized it's not wise to become infatuated with players just because they have foreign names or to lavish huge contracts on centers who can't get you a double-double.

    Fiscal responsibility became the league's focal point by the end of the '00s, whether it was saving salary-cap space for the 2010 free-agent market or trying to save a franchise from bankruptcy. One team executive estimated that up to 70 percent of trades are now made for financial reasons.


    Rocky Widner/NBAE/Getty Images
    $80 mil for Bibby? Didn't sound as crazy back in '02.
    The same way that Wall Street wizards will have to explain how Pets.com could raise $82.5 million in its initial public offering in 2000, we can only shake our heads as we look back at some of the contracts given out earlier in the decade: $84 million for Zach Randolph, $86 million for Andrei Kirilenko, $80 million for Mike Bibby, $85 million for Steve Francis, $126 million for Jermaine O'Neal, $91 million for Kenyon Martin, $73 million for Erick Dampier.

    You could look at Bibby as an example of how drastically things have changed; the contract he signed this summer was for $18 million over three years. Ben Gordon got the biggest deal this past offseason, at $55 million. Some of the reductions are due to a different collective bargaining agreement, but there's also a noted change in philosophy. No longer is being the best player on your team enough to get you a max contract. Owners and general managers will still find ways to overpay players, but as one agent said, the challenge now is to get $4 million for a guy worth $2 million a year, not to get a pretty good player a contract that will load up the trust fund for his unborn grandchildren.

    Even as recently as 2008 Gilbert Arenas was able to get $111 million from the Washington Wizards, who were actually willing to give him an additional $16 million if he wanted it despite a knee that required surgeries (yes, plural). The telltale moment of 2009 was when Carlos Boozer decided not to opt out of the final year of his contract. Boozer was coming off a down year, but he still averaged 16 points and 10 rebounds, similar to the numbers Elton Brand put up in only eight games in an injury-marred season the year before. But while Brand landed a five-year, $80 million contract in 2008 (an average of $16 million a year), Boozer's read of the market told him he wouldn't be able to do better than the $12 million he had coming his way this season -- in other words, about the same amount Wally Szczerbiak made in 2006-07. Clearly, this wasn't then.

    Spending is out. A recent Wall Street Journal graphic showed that the average American's debt ratio dropped below 18 percent this year after soaring from 17 percent to 19 percent in the first seven years of the decade. Even the Lakers, the NBA's most valuable organization according to Forbes, made Lamar Odom (a vital piece of their championship team) wait around and finally come back on what amounted to the Lakers' terms: $27 million guaranteed.


    AP Photo/Frank Franklin II
    The Knicks are still feeling the effects of Isiah's poor decisions.
    The good news for NBA fans is that we probably won't see teams load up their rosters with expensive players that spell salary-cap doom the way the Knicks did this past decade. The newer model is the Houston Rockets and their statistics-based approach. They're perfectly willing to acquire underpriced assets and now apparently willing to jettison their expensive superstar. Wouldn't you rather watch this Rockets squad overachieve than be subjected to what Knicks fans experienced the past decade?

    The fans are the biggest winners going forward. The players can't expect exorbitant salaries, and the owners can't count on a huge appreciation in value for their franchises, but the fans are getting a better product. The eradication of the zone-defense rules and the elimination of hand checking have opened up the game.

    As one coach said, "There's less boring, back-down, isolation basketball. More ball movement. A greater display of skill and team play."

    With zone defenses, the offense often requires a second playmaker on the court to be able to attack from different spots. It has also brought an emphasis on outside shooting. For the first seven years after the NBA adopted the 3-point shot in 1979, the average team attempted only two to three long-distance shots per game. The past three seasons, it's been used more than ever, up to an average of 18 times per game. Teams still go inside-out, but now it's way out, best evidenced by the Orlando Magic.

    "It's a necessary by-product of the style of our game," the coach said. "It opens up space to drive. It's become an extremely potent weapon."

    Last season, the league scoring average was 100 points per game for the first time since 1994-95. But the best development of all is that the small player is as important as ever. Teams are forced to actually scout players, not just select based on measurements from the predraft camp. In the first draft of this decade, 2000, the first seven players selected were all at least 6-8; Stromile Swift, Darius Miles, Marcus Fizer and DerMarr Johnson are out of the league, while second-rounders such as Michael Redd and Eddie House are still around. In 2001, six of the top eight picks were at least 6-10. And in 2002, 10 lottery picks were 6-9 or taller.

    This year, five of the top seven picks were 6-foot-5 or shorter, and you can bet the Knicks wish they'd made it six of eight and taken Brandon Jennings instead of Jordan Hill. And if the draft were held over again, you probably wouldn't see Hasheem Thabeet go second ahead of Tyreke Evans.

    We have learned, but we haven't convinced everyone yet. After all, you still see a few Hummers on the road.
     
  2. DaDakota

    DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    124,134
    Likes Received:
    33,020
    The Rockets are not over-achieving...they are simply ACHIEVING.

    DD
     
  3. MojoMan

    MojoMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,746
    Likes Received:
    2,153
    Exactly right.

    I do not understand why people keep insisting that the Rockets are over-achieving. They are a team without any glaring holes, except for the lack of reliable low-post center, and without any superstars. All of the players are good, competent players who cooperate with each other, and who complement each other well. Under coach Adelman, the Rockets play a rather sophisticated motion offense; and kudos to Jeff Van Gundy, they are also very impressive on the defensive end, at least much of the time.

    This team has been achieving and competing. It is not over-achieving, or at least not to any substantial degree. It is my sense that the same people who think the Rockets are substantially over-achieving are the same kind of people who have voted Tracy McGrady into the All Star Game this year.

    A team is more than just its superstars. It is truly astonishing to me how many of the so-called experts do not seem to be able to appreciate that. And the same goes for all of the fans who believe they are knowledgeable about the game of basketball who apparently cannot appreciate a team beyond its superstars either.
     
  4. Naija Texan

    Naija Texan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    55
    The model isn't something new, just get good players and have them all work for the win.

    Heck, to be honest, it is something that most teams tried to do before the late 90s where everyone thought, you could only succeed with a Jordan like super star capable of putting up numbers and big guy. Now most teams are starting to realize (probably thanks to the epic failure of both the Lakers and the Heat after their super star wings were left without Shaq and only the average role players), your team can't be filled with crap role players or benchwarmers because when a guy goes down, your season shouldn't just stop.

    Heck, Denver, Dallas, Boston, Portland (poor bastards) and Orlando have gotten the picture. Strong overall teams are what will win championships down the line, the era of a Superstar Jesus one or two man team is just about done.



    Unless Stern decides otherwise...
     
  5. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,625
    Likes Received:
    6,257
    NBA is a superstars league. Maybe teams are getting wiser about giving marginal players huge deals.
     
  6. redao

    redao Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,819
    Likes Received:
    58
    No superstar is always a No.1 glaring hole in NBA for any team unless you are content for being mediocre.
     
  7. the_hustler

    the_hustler Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,949
    Likes Received:
    48
    well said.

    half of these guys dont even know how good our players are .. they dont watch us play .. and hence they are surprised.
     
  8. pmac

    pmac Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    7,960
    Likes Received:
    2,537
    I wish everything in this article was true, wish there was a greater emphasis on skill. Unfortunately, there isn't. The NBA has done everything it can to eliminate post play and defense. They've taken size out as a drafting crutch and replaced it with raw speed. Any joe-shmoe can be effective this league with elite quickness because no one is allowed to touch him.
     
  9. adoo

    adoo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,622
    Likes Received:
    6,141
    Paying more for Arriza to replace Artest is the antithesis of this approach
     
  10. DOMINATOR

    DOMINATOR Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,443
    Likes Received:
    236
    can't the same be said about height/size?

    do agree about skill though, nba has come to rely on athleticism a lot and it annoys me to watch someone like dwight howard with all the physical traits to be great, actually do well in the league without any real basketball skill.
     
  11. Seven

    Seven Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,251
    Likes Received:
    28
    We'll athlete like him would do well in any era; however, I agree that he could do a hell lot better some post moves.
     
  12. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    29,111
    I think the funny thing is. . . he is saying the Rockets are OVERACHEIVING
    based on the mentality he is saying is 'dying'
    That you can simply measure players and put a title on them
    without every really watching them play.

    Rocket River
     
  13. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    29,111
    BTW - Isn't McGrady like the last person from the JVG Era?
    How does JVG get credit for *this* Rocket's Team's Defense?

    Rocket River
     
  14. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    36,136
    Likes Received:
    22,652

    shane battier, and the words of JVG still are spoken through him...energy,effort,excellence. (and I wasn't a huge JVG guy during the era)
     
  15. gmoney411

    gmoney411 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    3,752
    Likes Received:
    875
    Battier and Hayes who are probably our two best defenders were both around in the JVG era
     
  16. gmoney411

    gmoney411 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    3,752
    Likes Received:
    875
    I don't see how Dallas or Boston has gotten the picture. Boston just threw together a team of three superstars and filled the roster with whatever else they could get and won a championship. Dallas has been operating the same for the past 8 yrs or so and if anything in more recent yrs they have gotten further away from what the article is arguing for by acquiring more and more high paid all-stars (Kidd, Marion)

    Also the superstar big man/good guard or superstar guard/good big man combo is still what wins in the league. Kobe/Pau, Garnett/Pierce, Duncan/Parker, Wade/Shaq, Kobe/Shaq. The only team to win without that combo in the past decade was the Pistons.
     
  17. topfive

    topfive CF OG

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    19,042
    Likes Received:
    37,446
    And when was the last time you heard a TV promo for TEAM A's NON-STOP OFFENSE vs. TEAM B'S LOCK-DOWN DEFENSE? Instead it's all SUPERSTAR A vs. SUPERSTAR B: Kobe vs. LeBron, etc. Even promoting the Celtics' "Big 3" is pushing the 3 superstars instead of the team.
     
  18. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    15,916
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    The big irony is the whole 2010 free agency derby is about teams trying to spend like crazy on the superstars. Some are saving just to spend it all again. Some might be cleverly disguising it as being in the running but its really an excuse to shed costs.

    Also ironic how billionaire owners who acquired their fortune being fiscally smart are always so willing to shell out so much cash for junk players. The late 90's - 2000's contracts were just terrible.

    Look at some of these names. This isnt even the full top 10 on this particular list. Luis Scola came at a bad time for himself.

    =http://lowposts.com/mchale-files-part-ii/]The NBA: Where Amazingly Bad Contracts Happen!
    *Edit: Also shockingly bad how these players manage to waste all that money...goodness.


    What might stick around is looking for value for all 15 players, not stopping short at the main rotation players. Just can afford to put stock in 1-2 players with huge guranteed contracts nowadays. Gotta cut corners. Thats basically what Rockets had in mind with Morey.
     
    #18 Shroopy2, Jan 1, 2010
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2010
  19. TXRoxBBall

    TXRoxBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,143
    Likes Received:
    17
    IF I'm reading this right I'd have to disagree. Until someone wins it all without a Superstar I say you still need at least one to get the championship. Not saying you can't make a good run, but this league is designed around the "Star" and that's what it will take to win. Stern won't have it any other way.
     
  20. meh

    meh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    15,386
    Likes Received:
    2,259
    I have a feeling the "trend" will revert back to the old days when the economy rebounds a bit. Owners just can't help themselves just as the wall street guys can't help themsleves.

    There's a reason why you have the whole concept of "max players" in the CBA, because the owners have to have a rule that limit their spending or they pay too much and dig their own grave.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now