Why is that your response to everything? Even so, wouldn't that be more than what you have? I believe political science is a LA degree as well, so if anything, it would give you a better understanding of this thread and most of the issues in the D&D. Again....no logical thought pattern to your responses And before you ask about my background, I promise you'll look just as dumb as when you asked fchowd.
So now we know that your irrational tirades are partially a result of you being insecure and feeling defensive, about not having a college education. This clarifies some things. All I can say, is that if you are happy with your life and have a sweet job, then don't worry about it. If you feel like you're missing something because you don't have a college education go back and get one. Either way you are fine doing which ever option would make you feel most satisfied. No need to rant and rave to try and prove you're valid.
Doesn't it? Rocketslegend, leaving college after a year for a sweet job is great. I know students who do that all the time (in Silicon Valley, actually, where coding talent > *.*) Don't understand why you want to spend time hating on a system that you only knew for one year though. It would be like if I took a ballroom dancing class, didn't like it, and spent the rest of my years ranting about people who attend ballroom dancing classes. Let 'em dance! Who cares!
Response to everything? You're the one that brought up the irreverent topic on here. Also I would rather make 60k my first year working then be the man with liberal arts degree (or any other degree) without a job and 80k in debt just so I can say I have a piece of paper hanging on my wall. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspi...urial-dropouts-routinely-reveal/#4bd80f354be7
Wackjob socialists <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SJ50XmALd54" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/__iQGa0OkIs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
http://reason.com/blog/2016/04/11/ohio-university-wants-to-impose-cultural Ohio University students enjoy broad free speech rights—but after exercising those rights in a "Trump 2016" kind of way, they might be forced to take cultural sensitivity training. Indeed, OU President Roderick McDavis recently assured students who were offended by the appearance of pro-Trump messages on a campus free speech wall that he is "working to accelerate the development of a cultural competency element for freshman orientation," according to Campus Reform. McDavis made this remark during his appearance at an emergency meeting of the Hispanic and Latino Student Union late last week (as an aside, I'm calling problematic on that group: the name isn't gender neutral). The meeting was called after someone wrote "Trump 2016" and "Build the Wall!" on an area for expression where anything goes. One student, theater major Simone Alexander, opined that mandatory cultural competency classes are the no-brainer solution to other students writing things she doesn't like. To be clear: McDavis was not suggesting that the perpetrators be cleansed of their wrongthink. Instead, he was agreeing with irate students that incoming freshmen should be subjected to training that makes them less likely to subscribe to wrongthink in the first place. I'm of course using the term "wrongthink" very loosely here, since it's far from clear the person who wrote "Build the Wall!" actually holds that view. Perhaps he or she just wanted to make a provocative statement, or test the OU's commitment to honoring its free expression obligations—a test OU seems well-prepared to fail. The university should not expect incoming freshman to be indoctrinated into the safe space ethos as a precondition of settling into campus life. On the contrary, the proper place to expose students to contrary ideas remains the classroom. McDavis should leave matters in the hands of OU's many, undoubtedly very liberal faculty members—who no doubt spend plenty of time trying to persuade students to submit to a certain ideology.
HAHAHAHAHAHA <iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/BY1H1rZL53I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
This is the greatest rant I've ever heard in a long long time. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/oss7KmiHLmA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Disturbing. And Milo is a self hating gay man who has found a niche just like Coulter, the conservative woman who can give legitimacy to many anti- (XX) stances that neo cons hold. Also, I just dropped in to say you owe Codman an apology for welching, its truly pretty disgusting. Back to youtube clips for you.
One thing I really like about this is that he openly calls these people out as the "assholes" that they are. And they ARE assholes, beyond any question or doubt. This is one of the primary characterizations that seems to be becoming broadly accepted about these people and their methods, and not just on college campuses either. It is a label that is fair and well earned. They own it and have nobody to blame for it but themselves.
This is hilarious. ONE GUY... One ****ing guy had some qualms with him, and all of a sudden "ALL YOU SJWS AND YOUR GENDER STUDIES CLASSES!!! AAARRRGGHHHHHHH!". Seriously, why are so comedians or whatever that dude was so easily offended when someone says something in disagreement with them? Notice how pretty much the majority of the audience was cheering on his 'epic rant' and that audience are students from a liberal Mass university. So how does that work out? Kinda ****s on your narrative that college students are all SJW assholes.
She was so triggered, I was expecting that girl to blow-up a'la Mr Creosote after that "wafer-thin mint" in Monty Python's The Meaning of Life.
