1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Prime Kobe or Prime Durant

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by OlajuwonFan81, Feb 11, 2014.

?

Who do you take in their prime...Kobe or Durant?

  1. Kobe

    176 vote(s)
    50.1%
  2. Durant

    175 vote(s)
    49.9%
  1. clippy

    clippy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    4,869
    Likes Received:
    124
    They lost the Finals because the Lakers frontcourt completely shutdown Howard. Kobe had a great series and rightly deserved the FMVP that year, but his frontcourt was the difference. The way we know this is to look at the previous series the Magic was in, vs the Cavs. LeBron had perhaps the greatest playoff series ever yet the Magic won rather easily because Howard could do whatever he wanted. Not so in the Laker series. That's thanks to the best frontcourt in the NBA.
     
  2. Milos

    Milos Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    1,237
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Dwight, Rashard, Hedo and Pietrus outplayed Gasol, Odom, Bynum and Ariza that series ... it was the Lakers' backcourt domination of the Magic backcourt that was the deciding factor

    Yes, they made Dwight's job of scoring in the post a nightmare in that series, but he is only 1/3 of the Magic frontcourt, he has never been a dominant go-to post scorer, and he still managed to average 15 RPG and 4 BPG

    For a guy who's calling card as an elite NBA big man has always been rebounding and paint protection, he wasn't exactly 'shut-down' in the series putting up those dominant defensive numbers against 'the NBA's best frontcourt'

    As far as offense goes, focusing on Dwight with repeated double teams in the post to 'shut him down' only opened up perimeter opportunities for the the other 2/3 of the frontcourt, and they played pretty well:
    Hedo: 18 PPG 4.6 RPG 3.8 APG 0.4 BPG
    Rashard: 17.4 7.6 4 0
    Dwight: 15.4 15.2 2.2 4
    Pietrus: 10.6 2 0.4 0.2

    Let's compare that with what the Lakers' frontcourt did in the series:
    Pau: 18.6 9.2 2.2 1.8
    Odom: 13.4 7.8 0.8 1
    Bynum: 6 4.2 0.6 0.6
    Ariza: 11 6 1.6 0.2

    Comparing just the 4 primary frontcourt players from the teams in the series, a few conclusions can be made:

    A - Center Matchup: Bynum vs Dwight
    Contrary to your assumption, it appears Andrew Bynum is the center in this matchup who was 'completely shutdown' ... couldn't even stay on the court for 20 MPG, and was dominated individually in his matchup with Dwight (a 'top 5' center can't do better than 6&4 in the Finals ... what a joke)

    B - Wing SF Matchup: Ariza vs Pietrus
    Essentially a wash as Pietrus put up almost identical numbers in almost 10 fewer MPG

    C - PF/SF Matchup: Gasol+Odom vs Hedo+Rashard
    Another essential wash, as the Magic duo's damage from the outside basically equaled the interior contributions from the Lakers duo

    Overall, when isolating the frontcourt players, I would say the only clear domination in the series was what Dwight did to Bynum ... again, how did the Lakers frontcourt have a better series?

    To look for the clear Lakers advantage in the series, I'd probably look to the backcourt, where the Lakers had Finals MVP Kobe Bryant, who single-handedly nearly DOUBLED the production of the entire starting backcourt of the Magic:
    Bryant: 32.6 PPG 5.6 RPG 7.4 APG 1.4 SPG 1.4 BPG
    Alston + Lee: 16.4 3.6 3.2 1.4 0

    Again ... just looking at the individual results from that series, I don't see how any rational person can still make the case that the Lakers 2009 championship was more attributable to the Lakers frontcourt domination, rather than their backcourt domination
     
  3. Milos

    Milos Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    1,237
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    If you want to expand the list to all 30 NBA teams' frontcourts during those 3 seasons and include the regular seasons, please, take the time and show us the results ... again I thought I was being generous by only looking at the 16 playoff teams
    But I'm sure you're right, and look forward to all the other frontcourts you uncover that were better or comparable to the Lakers' from 2008-2010 ... I've already found the Magic, and someone else already mentioned the Nuggets Melo/Nene/KMart frontcourt ... could be a good place to start

    As for Bynum in 2009 ... well, check my previous post ... 20 minutes, 6 points and 4 rebounds a game from a 'top 5' center in a Finals series is pathetic for anybody ... Bill Cartwright thinks Bynum was embarrassed ...
    And yes, 50 games out of 82 in 2009 averaging 29 MPG is 'barely playing' for a starter
    In 2008, he only played in 35 games out of 82, and only started 25 (7th-most on the team btw), averaging 29 MPG ... mostly a backup, and still 'barely' playing
    In 2010, Bynum actually started 65 games (iron-man season for him) and finally managed to bump his MPG above 30 in his 6th NBA season ... congrats, I guess 15 & 8 is the new threshold for a 'top 5' NBA center

    So overall, from 2008-2010, there were a total of 11808 (82*48*3) minutes logged by a Laker playing the C position in the regular season
    Bynum only played 4415 of those minutes, or about 37.4% ... to me, that is 'barely' playing
     
  4. wekko368

    wekko368 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,904
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Sorry, but the Magic frontcourt was easily inferior to the Lakers. It's not even debatable. Look at their finals stats compared to the regular season stats. Dwight's offensive production and efficiency dropped tremendously while Gasol and Odom became more efficient.

    Nene (PER 18.8), Martin (13.6) and Carmelo (19) was a better frontcourt than Gasol (22.2), Odom (16.6) and Bynum (20)? :rolleyes:

    Are you not aware that Bynum tore his MCL earlier in the season and wasn't fully recovered by the time the playoffs rolled around?

    Who cares about 2008? We've only been talking about Laker title seasons. 2008 is irrelevant.
     
  5. GoRox2013

    GoRox2013 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,981
    Likes Received:
    84
    And none of this was due to playing next to Kobe?
     
  6. Icehouse

    Icehouse Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2000
    Messages:
    13,401
    Likes Received:
    3,744
    No they didn't. This is the furthest thing from the truth. Gasol was able to neutralize Howard 1-1, with Bynum also being able to defend him. Ariza and Odom were able to defend Shard and Turk 1-1 because both were long and could move. Orlando made the Finals behind Howard dominating inside and shooters getting open looks. LA didn't have to double Howard and their long wings were able to stay on Shard/Hedo, as opposed to them shooting over short guards in the previous rounds.

    Kobe has a strong enough resume. You don't have to recreate history for him.
     
  7. wekko368

    wekko368 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,904
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Correct. If it were due to playing with Kobe, their regular season numbers would've matched their finals' numbers.

    Do you also think that Kobe is the reason Dwight played poorly in the finals?
     
  8. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    24,527
    Likes Received:
    14,786
    How can playing with Kobe make the front court more efficient? Kobe doesn't make plays for others like Harden, all he does is iso and attack. Also saying the Lakers front court wasn't good is pretty funny, LA beat an East team that had KG and boasted one of the top defense in the history of the NBA. You think a front court of Gasol, Odom and Bynum had nothing to do with that?

    Kobe won a ring shooting 40% in a series, how is that even possible unless he had a major assist from his front court and miracle performances from Artest/Ariza.
     
  9. GoRox2013

    GoRox2013 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,981
    Likes Received:
    84
    -Kobe attracted triple and double teams every nite, which pulls attention AWAY from Gasol & Bynum (like any superstar player would:rolleyes:)

    - Assuming teams would consider doubling Gasol, it's ALOT harder to do it w/ Kobe out there on the perimeter

    Your quest to give Kobe no credit for anything has backfired. The hatred has become apparent


    I'm sure had he had the opportunity to play with 2 HOF caliber superstars, like Wade & Bosh, his percentages will probably be better across the board.
     
  10. Scolandry

    Scolandry Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    8
    I don't care about yalls argument but the part that i'm bolding had me dying. Please stop the stupidity.
     
  11. GoRox2013

    GoRox2013 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,981
    Likes Received:
    84
    Lol. So Lebron wins a ring with 2 superstars and arguably the best 3 point shooter of all time, and gets ALL the credit for making them better. But Kobe gets NO CREDIT?:confused:



    lol. Spoke like a true Kobe Bryant hater
     
  12. Aleron

    Aleron Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    11,685
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    Wade and Bosh averaged 28 between them in the playoffs last year, Wade was injured, Bosh was crap (lol 0 points in game 7), Lebron carried them. Whilst the Laker front court was good enough to greatly reduce the effectiveness of opposition front courts, for Miami's opponents, it was a feast up front. There's also a fairly solid argument that Gasol was the Lakers best player in the 2009-10 playoffs (since he was ahead in literally every advanced stat), and he was most definitely the best player in that game 7.

    Lebron has been better than Kobe ever was for years, but any semblance of possibility set sail last year when Lebron carried them to a title, this is about Durant.
     
    #452 Aleron, Feb 24, 2014
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2014

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now