http://www.82games.com/0809/08NOH15.HTM#bypos Here's a link to the break down of Tyson Chandler's minutes by position. Here's the link of Wilson Chandler's minutes by position: http://www.82games.com/0708/07NYK8C.HTM
lol I'm seriously still waiting for a response to this.. haha whatever it is.. it will be pure comedic GOLD..
you obviously don't know anything about basketball if you think Chandler can play the 2 or 3... he can't dribble (at all), can't create his own shot, can't shoot, and he's not quick... what "Chandler" are you thing about? can't be the same one that plays with Chris Paul...
Why would this team need another big guy? lol. If you were talking about Wilson Chandler, I am sure more people would take you seriously. As you can see, people are talking about putting Tyson Chandler as a shooting guard.
I get what he's saying about having a better defensive player next to Yao but Chandler wouldn't be your guy. Marcus Camby would be your guy. He's only making 8 mil per year and has some offensive game out side of Chris Paul lobs.
Tinman would be ashamed to call you a fellow 1999er. Anyway, I agree with you on the basis of not wanting to trade Artest for a Mike Miller, or VC and even Amare.
LOL, I really don't recall him ever seeing Chandler or seeing any other player of 7'0 playing the shooting guard position.
Let's break down the starting lineup then if we get Chandler PG: Rafer Alston SG: Tyson Chandler SF: Shane Battier PF: Luis Scola C: Yao Ming I'll pay to see Chandler guard Kobe ROFL.
"Yao/Deke/(Chandler)/Armstrong Scola/(Chandler)/Hayes/Dorsey Battier/(Chandler)/(TMac) TMac/Von Wafer/(Chandler)/Barry Alston/Brooks/(TMac) That team would be deeper, faster and more athletic, with youth for the future, more than if we kept Artest, Landry and Head. Of course, if TMac was out, we could start him at the 2/3/4, and be better, IMHO." no he meant four positions! lol