It certainly does not matter that people didn't get on record and predict failure by Gregerson on this message board. I was not happy with him being put in today or last night. I am sure MANY felt that way too. Hinch does not make the best in game decisions. Can we be wrong? Yes of course. You are right that we had chances to win all game long and the blame can't go to one player or coaching decision. Absolutely. And does it not make sense that someone might not want to predict failure by a player? That actually seems more negative than simply second guessing after the fact.
if we were given 15 minutes immediately after every move was made, I would have written a manifesto, too bad gregerson put a match to the thing so quickly.
I'm saying it's awfully convenient that you are are so knowledgable about when a mistake was made, but only happen to point them out after the fact. Every move that works, you ignore or support. Every one that doesn't, you complain about. Very simply, I'm saying you're a fraud that just b****es about any decision that doesn't work and pretends ike you knew it was a bad decision beforehand. You don't have to like it - I don't really care. You b**** about Hinch's stupidity. I b**** about your stupidity. Hinch ignores you. You can choose to ignore me or not. But as long as you continue to make stupid posts, I'll point them out. Just as it seems you believe you do about Hinch.
I think you are a joke. This post says it all. Here I was actually engaging with someone who would post such meandering idiocy. Wow. Hey man I am not some dork who puts people on ignore. Post away. I just know I'm dealing with a total tool now. Fraud? Jesus man you're killing me! Seriously, fraud? Ok. Just talk baseball and take your tampon out. My gosh. Also, whats with the crush on Hinch?
Is there some sort of unofficial bbs record as to how many times one individual can get banned? Oh how I longed to see nonsensical rants about Hinch, mixed with posts in semi-broken english with nary a paragraph to break up the flight-of-ideas. All it takes is a loss... its like mentioning Bettlejuice 3 times.
So here's this... I dunno, he seemed pretty composed in his answer to a not-very-good question. Oh. Right. He should've "showed more emotion." Should've gone on some tirade or something...
Broken English...nice try, love it. Why are you the resident egg head? You actually hurt this site. You had me on ignore. Just do it again.
It's a small group people. Easy to see who they are. Just realize you dont have to deal with the dork patrol. There are plenty of other posters.
i'm not ok with the term "dork" it implies some level of actual intelligence. It doesn't require any to regurgitate the obvious.
Everytime I post you attack me about being another poster. That in itself shoulda got you banned. It does give me pleasure to see someone who so badly wants others to think he's smart, be wrong every single time.
Ugh... too obvious and reeking of desperation. Deny it all you want... at this rate you're actually churning out worse drivel than your predecessor.
The original sense of dork is penis. It is probably an alteration of dick, dating to the early 1960s. From Jere Peacock’s 1961 novel Valhalla, in a reference to 1953: "You satisfy many women with that dorque?" In 1964, the familiar spelling was captured in the May issue of American Speech: The word dick itself serves as a model for two variants which are probably Midwestern, dirk and dork, also meaning “penis.”
Why are you trying to get banned? I mean have you even made one baseball post today? Oh and you're wrong again. Every. Single. Time.
