1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Obama risks a quarter million US jobs and higher electricity prices for his climate change fantasy

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by bigtexxx, Jun 2, 2014.

  1. Orange

    Orange Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,215
    Likes Received:
    195
    I like it.
     
  2. Commodore

    Commodore Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    31,021
    Likes Received:
    14,549
    Obama is a one man wrecking ball of executive action, ruling as if Congress does not exist.
     
  3. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,316
    Likes Received:
    5,088
    For the practical purposes of everyday governance, they don't. Real life requires decisions and can't function on pure political obstruction.
    You've got a DOJ, impeachment power, the Supreme Court, the FAUX/Koch propaganda machine, work the law yourself.
     
    #23 Dubious, Jun 2, 2014
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2014
  4. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,625
    Likes Received:
    6,257
    You need to move to china or at least maybe visit outside the US. What is more important jobs or the ability to breath?
     
  5. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,316
    Likes Received:
    5,088
    We should vote our most vulnerable, the poors, a livable minimum wage since we all care so much.
     
  6. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,731
    Likes Received:
    3,479
    China uses 4 times as much coal in a much smaller area than the US. Small factories use it. They use it to forge steel. They use it to heat their homes.

    This isn't about air particulates (something we all support) it is about climate change.
     
  7. justtxyank

    justtxyank Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,700
    Likes Received:
    39,334
    I came in like a wrecking ball!

    [​IMG]
     
  8. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    46,820
    Likes Received:
    18,536
    Well a functioning congress doesn't exist. They've all got their hands full with a giant circlejerk.
     
  9. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    494
    The fact that you believe this lunacy says everything that needs to be said about you.
     
  10. g1184

    g1184 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,798
    Likes Received:
    86
    I know the amount of dollars I pay for electricity, and it's not changing.

    Since you seem to know so much about my electricity prices, why don't you tell me how much more I should expect to pay. Unless, of course, you don't know anything about electricity prices.
     
  11. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    Question for you: do you believe the electricity that you use to power your home comes from 100% renewable sources? Yes or no?
     
  12. Rashmon

    Rashmon Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    19,263
    Likes Received:
    14,479
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,316
    Likes Received:
    5,088
    everyone knows that the electricity in the wires is from a variety of sources, the poster's billed amount is attributable to renewables and he pays a higher rate to do that. He's probably contracted at a rate for a period but of course when the supply produced by dirty cheap coal is phased out and contracts are renewed rates will likely edge higher....
    unless we have innovations and economies of scale that end up reducing rates.

    What's it going to cost to keep a 3' rise in sea level out of Texas City?

    [​IMG]
     
  14. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    Oh so we would have a 3' rise in sea level in Texas City, but it's been prevented by this action from Barack today?

    that's hilarious bro
     
  15. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,316
    Likes Received:
    5,088
    a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step, brah
     
  16. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    34,124
    Likes Received:
    13,529
    I think it's great.

    I do think it will put upward pressure on prices because generators will need to build a lot of new gas-fired generation to replace the lost load, and they won't do that until the price of electricity goes up enough to justify the investment. But, it won't be ruinous.

    I think extreme weather events will more often lead to extreme pricing events like we had in the polar vortex. I advise people to get fixed rate contracts and let energy companies bear the risks. We're currently not forecasting new generation to come on as fast as coal retires, so our reserve margins are declining, making brownouts more likely in the future. And gas-fired plants aren't as reliable as coal plants in extreme weather (because they rely on the gas pipeline infrastructure), so we're likelier to see spikes in wholesale prices in a world with less coal generation.

    And the industry still has a lot to figure out. It's hasn't been worthwhile to be a power generator for at least the last 10 years. Returns on capital are terrible. The market rules don't allow investors in generation to earn enough return, and that's with these coal plants in operation. With or without coal, electricity prices have to go up to keep generators in business.

    But, eliminating coal from the supply stack needed to be done and this was the best time to do it. It needs doing because coal generation is really dirty. Even if you don't believe in global warming, it's still dirty. Gas is much cleaner, and cost-competitive too, and more nimble a plant. Renewables are cleaner still, with almost no variable costs (though lacking in nimbleness). We can go it without coal now, and we should.

    These coal plants are almost all old now. These are plants built 60 years ago. The technology they use is old, not just for scrubbing, but everything. The only reason than can compete at all is because coal is cheap. And coal is cheap because the externalities of burning it aren't paid for by the generator.

    These coal plants would be retiring soon anyway. They're old. Gas-fired generation is cheap enough to have a place in baseload generation alongside coal. Coal and nuclear plants don't have a strong price advantage anymore and the economics of maintaining such an old asset will force it out anyway. It's just a bit quicker this way.

    The EPA isn't even holding coal plants to the same standards as other kinds of generation. The cleanest coal plant is still much dirtier than would be tolerated in a gas plant. I think this is a good idea, because fuel diversity is valuable to keep. Diversity will help protect the market from idiosyncratic shocks. Right now, no one can see a fair return for building a clean coal plant. But, I hope and expect they'll find a way to make it viable, because we don't want to drop coal out of the generation mix entirely.

    And, finally, this is nowhere close to over. They'll be fighting over this for years. One, coal has powerful actors in Washington. Two, no one wants to have a blackout because of an overzealous EPA. I expect there will be exceptions made all over the place for the sake of the reliability of the grid. So, in the long-run it will force remaining coal plants to burn cleaner, but we won't really have any calamitous energy crisis because it'll be a slow change-over.

    By the time it's done, we'll probably have autonomous distibuted solar generation on all our rooftops anyway with Tesla batteries for storage, backed by bloomboxes.
     
  17. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    a single step that will cost us a quarter of a million jobs and expose our nation's most vulnerable (fixed income seniors, the poor) to higher electricity costs?

    and you're telling me that single step won't solve the problem?
     
  18. Commodore

    Commodore Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    31,021
    Likes Received:
    14,549
    Energy and food consume the largest portion of a poor person's budget, and this prick who has never run a lemonade stand and has his every need provided for doesn't care. He wants to make energy prices skyrocket.

    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/HlTxGHn4sH4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

    Aint got time for the little people. He's got delusions of grandeur that he's lowering the oceans and saving the planet.

    The idea that this will improve anyone's quality of life is insane. It will just make it more expensive to power our homes and acquire wealth.
     
  19. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,316
    Likes Received:
    5,088
    Ok, we include electricity in Social Security brah and welfare, we create an infrastructure job corps to provide 250,000 jobs building renewable energy projects and we tax the 1% to pay for it.

    glad you've come around with your new found empathy
    Utopia Bound!
     
  20. mc mark

    mc mark Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    468
    When you resort to insults yada yada yada

    :rolleyes:
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now