Not a back pedal. The information used for the wiretap was funded by dems not republicans and it wasn't disclosed to the court. That's what I said. 100% correct. Just take a deep breath adoo...... You just answered it. If that's what's verified then everything else is unverified.
the mental midget is publicizing his ignorance. did you even read the memo ? for the education of the mental midget read page 4 of the memo, Paragraph 5) - The Papadopoulos info triggered the opening of an FBI investigation in late July 2016. ROFLMAO what we have here is the mental midget back-pedaling again !
Nunes who wrote the memo didn't even read the applications to see the evidence! Embarrassing. Nunes should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. Anyone who is attacking Rosenstein and Mueller is obstructing justice and should be thrown in jail. Time to clean out the stupid alt-right politicians who are in Putin's pocket. At least John McCain is standing up for America.
I have read the memo. What I mentioned is on the second page . It's section 1 part a. Your papadopoulos comment by doesnt contradict what i wrote.
Actually it was disclosed to the court so you are 100% wrong. http://thehill.com/policy/national-...sources-political-funding-in-fisa-application So do you take back what you wrote now? Or are you going to stand on your lie and pretend no one else can see it?
Nunes admitted that Tre Gowdy was the only one from Congress who has read the FISA application. since the much hype around this memo, orchestrated by Fox News w the help from Nunes, Gowdy has tweeted his 100% support of the FBI and the Muller investigation. announced that he will not seek re-election
so why can the FBI investigate Clinton on a right wing hit piece from a disregarded author but you cant investigate Trump from an intelligence dossier if it may have been funded by the opposition?
Again, I ask you? It was disclosed to the court so you are 100% wrong: http://thehill.com/policy/national-...sources-political-funding-in-fisa-application So again - do you take back what you wrote now? Or are you going to stand on your lie and pretend no one else can see it?
Moral of the story: if you want to go to the Russians to get dirt on your opponent, use a former Western spy. The Trump’s DIY business style collided with decorum of the two party political structure. There’s nothing wrong with going to the Russians, you just have to do it with “optics” in mind.
ur wrong. moral of the story, don't lie. everyone of the Trump team's original stand was "we have nothing to do w the Russians, never met them". then it changed to "we'd met the Russians to discussion adoption", and then, it changed to "it was operational research on the opposition" Had team Trump told the truth, from the outset, about meeting the Russians, there would be no Mueller investigation.
I've already laid out why it might compromise or threaten national security. I've already listed some of the parts that have been verified. We now know that payments were made to members of Trump's team from Russia and other foreign powers. These things were not known at the time of the Steele document. So all of those claims have been verified. There were also meetings between members of the Trump team and Russian government officials which nobody knew about and have since been verified. It also mentions of cyber attacks which also came to be true and have been verified. The dossier also talked about Russian attacks on the DNC computers and information which of course has also been verified. It also reported information on Carter Page and his connection with Russians which has been verified. Sorry Doc Tal, the memo in which you had placed so much hope turned out to be a stinky turd bowl of nothing.
Well, nevermind that you have said that. Senators and top FBI officials have said that. LOL. If people want to just cross that off as "partisan," then they certainly aren't going to listen to you or me. So, I'd save your keystrokes to whomever you're typing there.
