1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

My solution to Hack-A (JVG feel free to use it tonight on the broadcast)

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by bratna8, May 25, 2015.

  1. bratna8

    bratna8 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,095
    Likes Received:
    4,919
    Everything will stay the same (you can't do it under 2 minutes) the only I thing would change is if the player makes the second shot, regardless of what happens on the first shot, if he makes the second shot, he gets to shoot a 3rd shot.

    I think this dramatically decreases the hack-a strategy if coaches know that there's a possibility of giving up 3 points when they do it. It will basically only work if the player misses both shots.
     
  2. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    43,386
    Likes Received:
    25,392
    How bout players who make tens of millions get training that cutting edge "sports science" offers so they make more of them?
     
  3. Zergling

    Zergling Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    5,726
    Likes Received:
    3,625
    Just like the NFL is coming up with ways to change the extra point, NBA needs to come up with ways to change free throws. Fans just don't want to watch either play because they're boring.

    In the NBA, my idea is for a foul that leads to 2 or 3 free throws, the first one is not taken and is automatically a point (which is awarded to the player who shoots the 2nd or 3rd one).

    This by the way kills hack-a-whoever because this guarantees 1 point per possession. So even if an absolutely awful FT shooter like Jordan/Dwight only shoot 30% from the line, that's 1.3 points per possession.
     
  4. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    27,240
    Uhhh yeah, GS doesnt need to use the hack strategy anyways.
     
  5. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    35,245
    Likes Received:
    24,294
    How about if you get hacked, you get to shoot FT anywhere you want in the paint?
     
  6. 08kx250f

    08kx250f Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes Received:
    170
    How about if you get hacked. 1 shot and the ball.
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. napalm06

    napalm06 Huge Flopping Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,379
    Likes Received:
    29,555
    All aboard the merry-go-round that is this conversation!

    The rule is unsportsmanlike and ruins the pure competition of the game. If a player can't make free throws it's very legitimate to foul him with the ball. But letting the defense dictate the other team's decision making by fouling players of their choice away from the play? Not good.

    Your turn!

    This is my preference.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. napalm06

    napalm06 Huge Flopping Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,379
    Likes Received:
    29,555
    While we're at it, how about the NBA central office constantly reviewing flops and rescinding free-throws or points created by flops during dead balls?

    (I jest, but that would be epic.)
     
  9. basketballholic

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    17,516
    Likes Received:
    4,170
    Just interpret the rules consistently. If they're going to call two-hand touch fouls then call all contact. It is UNDENIABLY INCONSISTENT to call every foul when 2 hands are placed on Dwight and then not call every foul where 2 hands are placed on Harden. If every 2-handed touch were called then Harden would shoot 40 free throws a game and we'd be undefeated.

    That's what should change. Officiating the rules consistently. So if you're not going to call every 2-handed touch on Harden then can't call that crap when they do it to Dwight.
     
    #9 basketballholic, May 25, 2015
    Last edited: May 25, 2015
  10. 08kx250f

    08kx250f Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes Received:
    170
    Yea but I swear they need to fine the players and REFS for flops. Punish the official for falling for that crap.
     
  11. RV6

    RV6 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    The reason they're hacking is because they can't hit free throws..So there's really no reason to fear the possibility of giving up 3 points. They can't even go 2-2 usually.
     
  12. Red.Glare

    Red.Glare Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    436
    I think that is a great idea! The second, or third shot (on 3 pointers), really does become the bonus. That would speed up the game so much and end much of the intentional fouling. Your idea would do nothing to really change the intentional fouls committed at the end of games when behind either.
     
  13. Stack24

    Stack24 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2003
    Messages:
    11,745
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Why do we have to make rules for a few players who can't hit a shot. So are we going to adjust the game for people who can't dunk? Should we bring the goal lower to accommodate them?

    Should we make the hoop bigger for those aren't good outside shooters so we can help them?

    This is part of the game they need to learn just like any other skill.
     
  14. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    18,402
    It's quite different because players can't be forced to do those things while they can be forced to shoot FT's, which is strange on its own.

    The rules always change to make a better game. I would argue this change would improve games instantly given how the rule is being abused.
     
  15. ibm

    ibm Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    8,600
    Likes Received:
    60
    get rid of the last 2 min. make the rule the same the entire game. that's the only thing in my mind that needs change. everything else stays where they are will be just fine.

    i dont mind a game goes for a few extra minutes. after all, only a few players they'd hack in the entire league. and yes, those who cant shoot ft's need to be punished, embarrassed and taken advantage of.

    fyi, iirc, chris webber's ft % in his rookie yr: 50%; the year after: 75%. saw it on tv the other day.
     
  16. danoman

    danoman Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,769
    Likes Received:
    728
    That's a great idea! It will also dramatically cut some time off the games.
     
  17. xaos

    xaos Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2015
    Messages:
    6,194
    Likes Received:
    15,486
    How about if you get hacked, a fan gets to shoot a free throw for 500 points.
     
  18. TheFreak

    TheFreak Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,253
    Likes Received:
    3,210
    There used to be a 3 to make 2 rule. Seems like they could just bring it back for these intentional fouls off the ball.
     
  19. SemisolidSnake

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2013
    Messages:
    4,921
    Likes Received:
    5,803
    Agreed. Free throws are more fundamental to every NBA player than even dribbling. It's disgusting that, as a franchise, we allow millionaires to perform worse than any middle-schooler coming out of a Calvin Murphy camp at the line. Shameful.
     
  20. ClutchCityReturns

    ClutchCityReturns Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,321
    Likes Received:
    2,442
    But the NBA has a long history of improving the quality of the product through rule changes, and they're often inspired by only a handful of players, and in some cases, a single player. Not to mention, legislating the hack-a-whomever strategy out of the game would be a minor change compared to some of the items listed below.

    Dunking
    Goaltending
    5-second "back down"
    24-second shot clock
    3-second violation
    10-second / 8-second violation
    Addition of (and subsequent adjustments to) the 3 point line

    All that said, don't get me wrong. It infuriates me that millionaire basketball players can't hit an uncontested shot from 15 feet, but for whatever reason, some just never will. But they're already penalized for it when they're fouled legitimately (with the ball), so I don't see the elimination of the hacking strategy as some sort of free pass.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now