1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Michael Kidd-Gilchrist

Discussion in 'NBA Draft' started by haoafu, Jun 4, 2012.

  1. acshen

    acshen Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    911
    Likes Received:
    110
    Please remind me of the last time the second best player from a championship team went on to be a superstar
     
  2. acshen

    acshen Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    911
    Likes Received:
    110
    Use their freshman year stats... also he was drafted for his defensive presence. He isn't as polished offensively and that is clear.

    Shaq freshman 14 & 12
    Duncan freshman 10 & 10
    Lopez freshman 13 and 6

    Remove your Wildcat goggles for me.
     
  3. JD88

    JD88 Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    2,597
    Likes Received:
    606
  4. acshen

    acshen Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    911
    Likes Received:
    110
    Just to school you a little more

    Bill Walton freshman year: 20 and 15
    Ewing freshman: 15 and 9
    Robinson freshman: 8 and 4
    Olajuwon freshman: 8 and 6

    Its clear from freshman year comparisons that Davis is a special talent. I won't deny that. The comparison is still valid. They were all about the same age in freshman year.
     
  5. JD88

    JD88 Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    2,597
    Likes Received:
    606
    You hardly ever see one because superstars on their own dont win in the college game.

    What did Durant win? Wade? Love? Nothing. Teams win games in college.

    That being said, John Cal is doing something at UK nobody, including you, has ever seen before.

    Look at the 2009-10 team. John Wall, Demarcus Cousins, Patrick Patterson. 3 potential super stars (you guys seem to have written PPat off already).

    Look at this years team. Possibly 6 guys drafted in the first round. You think for a second if MKG was on some garbage team like UCONN or Texas or Marquette or UCLA he wouldnt have averaged 20 a game?

    Ive watched a lot of college ball. Any of those guys on our starting five last year, to include our 6th man (Darius Miller) and 7th man (Kyle Wiltjer, #19 prospect) would have averaged 15+ for one of those crap teams.

    I may follow UK, but I would like to see you, written out plain as day, that MKG will be a bust. I will add it to my sig, and 3 years from now, we will see how hes looking.
     
  6. Puedlfor

    Puedlfor Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    21
    Actually, if anything should count as a warning sign against MKG - aside from his shooting - it's that he did play on such a loaded team. For most of the games Kentucky played, the five most talented players on the court were always wearing the same jersey. That's never going to happen in the NBA.

    He's going to get a lot more attention from defenses than he did in the NCAA and any holes in his offensive game are going to be ruthlessly exploited.

    However, he was able to contribute in a lot of other ways besides scoring, and he seems to have a tremendous work ethic - and the other players on the team seemed to respond to it. When you take an 18 year old kid in the draft to revitalize your franchise it's always going to be a risk - but he seems to have the drive and focus to succeed and to improve his game, rather than rest on his athleticism.
     
  7. Puedlfor

    Puedlfor Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    21
    So where does Michael Kidd-Gilchrist's 12 and 7 sit on freshman year comparisons?
     
  8. acshen

    acshen Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    911
    Likes Received:
    110
    See my previous post regarding wing players in their freshman season. That one you quoted was in response to the idea that Davis is the #1 on 14 & 10
     
  9. LCII

    LCII Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    395
    My feelings on him is that he'll be Jerry Stackhouse type with more defense. A decent scoring SG/SF who makes the all-star game a few times, but not a superstar/franchise player.
     
  10. jopatmc

    jopatmc Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,368
    Likes Received:
    387

    Oh brother. You mean without the handle and shooting too, don't you?
     
  11. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    21,011
    Likes Received:
    12,880
    MKG will more than likely not be a superstar, but he will more than likely be a great role player (lock down defender and 3rd/4th scoring option). He looks like a hybrid Wallace and Shawn Marion. Easy top 5 pick, but other guys will definitely be available with more upside and potential at #2.
     
  12. AFS

    AFS Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,776
    Likes Received:
    407
    They weren't quite a championship team but Drexler in his UH days does come to mind.
     
  13. coachbadlee

    coachbadlee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    28,051
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Whenever i think of MKG, i remember this..

    Sorry.:confused:
     
  14. indianboy1234

    indianboy1234 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Guess what everybody we got our undies in bunch for a guy we won't get
     
  15. Asian Sensation

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 1999
    Messages:
    17,915
    Likes Received:
    6,916
    Jerry Stackhouse with more defense would be a HOFer. I think you're forgetting how good Jerry Stackhouse used to be. He was far better than just decent.
     
  16. MrButtocks

    MrButtocks Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,254
    Likes Received:
    5,162
    Wesley Johnson 2.0?
     
  17. HMMMHMM

    HMMMHMM Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,031
    Likes Received:
    597
    MKG is 18. Taylor 23.

    Remember you were 23 and played against 18 years olds?
    Unless your a complete scrub and the other guy is an out of this world talent, you should get the better of the match-up.
     
  18. haoafu

    haoafu Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    56
    You should watch some of his games or at least read through the scouting reports instead of just my summary, which is just a brief summary.

    MKG has the speed of PG and the strength to defend 4's. As 18 years old he's going to back down a lot of wings in NBA rightnow. If not, he has the speed to drive by the bigger ones. His famous 'breakfast club' to do weightlifting and other excercises is a strong indication that he'll only get stronger in a few years. I don't see any problem for him to postup against most wings when he's 22/23.

    He used to play PG and has petty good handle and passing ability for SF/SG. He's just limited in creating his own shots off dribble at this stage, and it's very much in the reach based on his handle/speed/high IQ. He's also a complete player who can do pretty much all the things well and a lot of things on elite level(defense,rebounding,finishing...). I don't know what skill you think he's lacking other than shooting. His 75% free throw shooting and work ethic is good indication for improvement.

    If you mean compete against Lebron/Kobe/Durant in the Parsons way, he can do it right now as well as , if not better than Parsons. What I mean is he'll be able to compete against them on the same superstar level in a few years.

    Also I clearly mentioned I hope we could take him at #4/#5(not #2), because Lowry plus filler or a pick has a chance(yes it's a slim chance) for that to happen.
     
  19. jopatmc

    jopatmc Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,368
    Likes Received:
    387
    I watched all but 3 of their games last season. I said I thought he would be a very good player. No question he is a gamer. No question about his attitude. Fantastic work ethic. My question is can he develoop his offensive game to superstar status? In other words, can he develop the jumper, can he develop the handle, and can he play the game intellectually at an upper stratospheric level and be a playmaker. Superstars, guys like Kobe, Lebron, Melo, Durant....they have the skillset and the bball iq to do those things offensively.

    I can't recall any player developing from "garbage man" status into a multi-tool offensive force offensively. Tracy McGrady is probably the closest. But in his case, it was more a matter of not getting minutes and playing alongside Vince Carter who was taking all the shots. When you look at McGrady's production per minute or per shot, once he started gettng minutes and shots the whole game was there. I suspect if he had gotten shots and minutes as a rookie, he would have been a 20 ppg guy as a rookie. And he was the age of a college freshman his rookie season, he didn't go to college.

    MJ came into the league minus a 3-point shot. But he still hammered out over 20 ppg without the 3-point shot. So, you think MKG can go to the rim like MJ??? I'm sorry, I don't see that. I don't see that kind of quicks and smoothness. I don't see that kind of handle. I see a bigger, bulkier, slower player than Jordan. I'm not saying he's big, bulky, and slow. What I'm saying is the NBA is FAST and uber athletic. You won't get there with just physicality. You gotta have the skillset. I just don't see it in MKG. And I don't know of any previous baller that came to the league without a developed offensive game that developed one in the NBA that put them at superstar status.
     
  20. HMMMHMM

    HMMMHMM Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,031
    Likes Received:
    597
    Look at who you are comparing him though. Those are the absolute elite offensive players.

    I don't think anybody is saying that's what MKG will be. He will be a difference maker on the defensive end. A leader, hard worker, good locker room guy. His offensive game will need some time, but if he will end up being a better version of Gerald Wallace (which is my projection) than that's certainly not too shabby either.
    There is no Kobe, Lebron, Melo or Durant in this year's draft.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now