You said it, gwayne! You're either with the kid rapers, baby killers and corpse burners or you're with the terrorists! Pick one, people! gwayne, you incredible ass, it is wholly possible for sane people to: 1. Support the troops 2. Oppose the terrorists, and even... 3. Be hella outraged when people wearing American uniforms rape, kill and burn a FOURTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL. You represent the second most repugnant segment of our society. If those soldiers and ex-soldiers are convicted, they should die. Meanwhile, you should go to hell.
So do I. I oppose the death penalty, but as long as we have it we should definitely use it on people that use US military issued guns to perpetrate child rape and murder. I wouldn't want an unfair trial getting in the way of that. There is, I believe, little doubt a child was raped, killed and burned. And apparently the military thinks enough of the allegations that they've indicted several of their own. Meanwhile, you can't be bothered to be bothered by THE RAPE, MURDER AND BURNING OF A FOURTEEN YEAR OLD. No, no. Save your vitriol for the real enemies -- American Democrats. You're the worst we've ever had here and that is truly saying a lot. I checked your blog, by the way. I know a lot of the players you recommended. If they had the slightest inkling of what goes on inside your ****ed up head they would never let you through those doors again.
He's not a stalinist, he's on record as falling on Hitler's side during WWII. So he's more of a national socialist.
Really. Now that's the liberal tolerance I've come to expect! If these guys are guilty, I have no problem with the death sentence for the ones that did the killing, but this rush to judgment for the sole purpose of scoring political points merits nothing but contempt and scorn.
Actually, I supported Stalin's efforts. In retrospect, we could have defeated Hitler by letting the Rooskies take all the burden of defeating the Nazis since they took over 80% of it anyway. We could have helped them out with planes and other war materials. This would have had the advantgae of letting the Rooskies "liberate" France, etc.
I'm not aware of any of those musicians making some kind of promise to tolerate people that villify war opponents (who, by the way, comprise more than half of the country) over kid rapers. You have suggested repeatedly that the mere reporting of heinous crimes, when perpetrated by renegade US soldiers, constitutes support for terror. You are a nutjob, your ideas are as dangerous as they are hateful and you represent the ugliest effect of the Bush years this side of all the unnecessary dead, maimed and scarred for life. Sorry, bud. Carolyn Wonderland's not into that kind of stuff. That's not on her or me, that's on you. And saying that I or others are angry over this stuff in order to score political points doesn't make it so. We're angry over it because it is plain ****ing evil.
Allow me to wholeheartedly agree. To me, Gwayneco represents everything about why America is so hated the world over, why our culture is so decrepit, and why our "morals" are nothing more than lip service.
Batman - is it really necessary to get personal and drag real life people (the musicians) into this discussion? I think you've stepped over the line, in my opinion.
I think I can pretty much guarantee my dear friend of 13 years Carolyn, with whom I've had many political discussions and whose protest songs I've enjoyed on countless occasions wouldn't mind. But I'd be happy to ask her. gwayne, why don't you email me through the board and tell me your name so I can check around and see if my musician friends are more upset that I use their names or more upset that a sicko like you is acting friendly with them. By the way texxx, I think it's awesome that you're accusing me of stepping over a line. Reminds me of the time that basso said I wanted Americans and babies to die and terrorists to thrive and he got offended because I told him to **** off.
This just goes to show that liberals are hypocrites when it comes to tolerance and civility. Typical from the BusH!leristas.
Agreed. I think you touched a nerve when you exposed BJ's real political motivations behind his scorn. Everything in his life revolves around his politics. It's either black or white. You're either with him, or you're the scum of the Earth in his view.
Are you saying that she would actually kick out members of the audience with whom she disagreed? If true, what a ****.
That is a most r****ded take on tolerance and civility. True liberals have never been tolerant of the kind of hateful bs you consistently spew, in fact it is a basic tenet of liberalism to actively oppose it. Do you really think tolerance means you "tolerate" every idea and act by everyone?
Was he similarly outraged at the allegations of bad behavior by UN blue-helmets on peace-keeping missions?
