1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Feigen] Andre Iguodala, JaVale McGee up next on Rockets' wish list

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by J.R., Jul 3, 2019.

  1. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,946
    Likes Received:
    11,404

    I don't disagree …. but someone always shakes loose. Players don't fit , teams change course …. good players become available. Why not be in position to take advantage of that and be significantly better for it than you could have been?

    One thing we have to realize - The hard cap scenario was likely only in play if they got Butler. No reason to submit yourself to that cap if you didn't get a hell of a lot better.

    Butler +NT-MLE+BAE is great.

    NT-MLE+BAE and no Butler …. not so much when you can use Shumpert and avoid the hard cap.

    Shump S&T + T-MLE is probably better than NT-MLE+BAE.

    And don't forget about EG …. if you cant extend him , you have to move him. Would suck to be limited by the hard cap in that situation.
     
  2. Gorilladunks

    Gorilladunks Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    WASHED? Lolololololol
     
  3. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,945
    very well put. I see your argument as equal to mine but the opposite side of the same coin. it all depends on things we don't know lol. who could we have signed for the NTMLE and BAE, or who could we get in a S&T for shumpert? I LEAN to signing FAs rather than relying on trades because trades are way less common and they cost picks. but like I said it all depends on who you get in each scenario.
     
  4. forchette49

    forchette49 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    1,458
    That is just simply an exaggeration and not true, both are still very serviceable off the bench as 7th men at worst and could even make spot starts for injuries.
     
  5. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,946
    Likes Received:
    11,404
    Picks is another issue …. What good are they really as far out of the lottery as the Rockets have been for the last several seasons ? Picking 20+ ...

    Lotto picks are one thing and they don't always work out …. anything outside the lottery is a total crapshoot and you are waiting 2-3 years for a player to develop into a contributor.

    I kinda see picks as being for teams on the outside looking in as they have time to develop them and don't care about the record in the mean time …. contenders want proven players who can help them now , picks are just currency to them.
     
    xtruroyaltyx likes this.
  6. TheFreak

    TheFreak Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,259
    Likes Received:
    3,220
    Having Ennis on the court instead of Green in game 6 against GS could’ve been the difference between winning and losing. There was a series of plays where Green forgot what jersey he was wearing. The point is, you don’t neglect to use all the bullets in your chamber and then claim you’re going all in. GSW was without Durant and Cousins but at least we avoided the repeater tax. Awesome.
     
    Hakeemtheking, Icehouse and cmlmel77 like this.
  7. joshuaao

    joshuaao Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,481
    Likes Received:
    2,287
    James Ennis was not the difference between winning and losing in game 6. He regularly got lost in our switching scheme when he was with us. We all b****ed about him until the day he was traded away.

    We could’ve used our 2019 1st to get a rotation piece instead of shedding Knight’s deal at the deadline. Maybe that person would’ve been the difference for us. But not James fkin Ennis lol
     
    RudyTBag and Patience like this.
  8. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,945
    all this is true, but why spend that currency on trading shumpert rather than just signing a FA (assuming equal talent acquired either way)?

    for example, we can S&T shumpert and a pick for Iguodala and his $17M contract.

    or we could've signed a player of equal talent (albeit none with his championship pedigree) for the MLE and save our pick for future trading.

    its also important to consider the chance of making that kind of shumpert trade is much less likely than signing a rotation player for the MLE. there is a chance that going with that shumpert idea leads to nothing but overpaying Shumpert for a year.
     
  9. The Cat

    The Cat Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,796
    Likes Received:
    5,204
    That's fair in a vacuum. But again, with the limited amount of teams that have paid the repeater tax, not sure why we should hold them to a different standard than any other NBA team. It's obviously a major deterrent to owners and ownership groups well beyond this one.

    Now, there's a huge difference between the repeater tax and the luxury tax. If they don't pay it this coming season, I agree -- there are no excuses. That's a failure on the part of ownership. And same goes for the remainder of Chris Paul's contract. This just feels like a bizarre thread in which to play that card, since they're talking about adding $17M in payroll and going well into the tax.

    P.S. Fertitta and Morey have definitely made media missteps (i.e. the "all in" reference). We agree there. I wish they would have just owned what they were doing.
     
    TheFreak and TheRealAllpro like this.
  10. Icehouse

    Icehouse Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2000
    Messages:
    13,403
    Likes Received:
    3,747
    They talked about adding players all last year too until they pivoted and didn’t. Kinda like they talked big about this summer and.....did nothing. Talk is cheap at some point.

    Either way, use the available salary slots to upgrade the team. Not talk about it. Do it.
     
    J Sizzle likes this.
  11. blahblehblah

    blahblehblah Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,689
    Likes Received:
    3,832
    Is that really true? Did the rockets know on July 1st that Iggy was going to be traded? Thus deciding not to make the full or near it, NT MLE offer to Reddick, Lamb, Curry, Morris etc? Instead they immediately split their MLE apart to resign daniel house, to a contract starting at the same amount as the BAE. If thats not about saving money right off the bat... what is it?

    you've referenced the Butler trade several times now, incorrectly claiming that it would have "added significant money." The trade was 4 1st plus + Marques/Knight for Butler. The combine salaries of Knight and Marques was around 18 million while Butler's was close to 20. At worst, the trade only added 2 million to the Rockets salary. Furthermore both Knight and Marques were negative salary dump, leading most to not take the offer seriously... especially compared to Miami's & Phillys offer.

    GS is not merely attempting to do anything regarding spending. Despite Durant spurning their max offer, the Warriors managed to NOT avoid the luxury/repeater tax by taking on DLO's max via sign ad trade. Unlike the Rockets which hurriedly dodged when faced with the mere prospect of the repeater tax 4 years into the future, the Warriors instead took on 38+ million more in salary after Durant left. When it comes to spending/trying... they aren't attempting, they are doing.

    Are the Rockets really attempting to take on salary/IGGY via trade? No clue... but if I had to bet, just like with Butler last year and just recently, I betting against it.

    The Rockets over the start of the past two free agency period has indisputably decline to spend. They held onto their mle both year, last year they let Ariza and LMM go primarily due to financial concerns. This year they sepnd half their tax payer MLE to resign House, completely taking them out of contention for any of the other free agents like Reddick, Green, Morriss, Jymachl... Perhaps most damning? They did that the very first few hours.
     
    TheFreak, Easy and Icehouse like this.
  12. YOLO

    YOLO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    Messages:
    46,688
    Likes Received:
    44,884
    didn't look washed 2 weeks ago or throughout the playoffs for that matter
     
    Patience and TheRealAllpro like this.
  13. blahblehblah

    blahblehblah Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,689
    Likes Received:
    3,832
    Serious question, how often in the past 5 years has something "shaken loose" that was acquired midway through the season that made an NBA team significantly better?

    Adding NT-MLE + BAE to the current Rockets sounds a lot better to hoping for something that might be available later on. Imagine going after Reddick, Morris, Hood, Hill, Curry, Bullock, Carroll, lamb, Aminu, etc. right at the start of FA.

    I don't understand the concern over the Hard cap... The Hard cap is set at 7+ million over the luxury tax threshold... In the past decade or heck since the invention of the luxury tax, how many times has the Rockets spent 5% OVER of the tax? ZERO? Maybe Once?

    The Hard cap wont tie the Rocket's hands. It isn't a constraint, because the reality is, they'll never or rarely ever.. even voluntarily approach that figure.
     
  14. YOLO

    YOLO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    Messages:
    46,688
    Likes Received:
    44,884
    as a most recent example, picking up rivers/faried made houston significantly better. both of which shook loose. if the rockets continued the entire season with the offseason pickups from a year ago that were a big part of the 11-14 start, they may not even have made the playoffs.
     
    Patience, Corrosion and RocketToVegas like this.
  15. BigBum

    BigBum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2018
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,346
    Add mcgee, tilman is is unlikely to get luxury tax profit.

    McGee is 2.6 million vet min.

    WCS is 1.7 million vet min it is published.
     
  16. TheRealAllpro

    TheRealAllpro Morey only fan

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2012
    Messages:
    5,842
    Likes Received:
    4,999
    My question is if we do t get McGee because say the Lakers throw money at him after failing to land Khawhi, who do we sign?
     
  17. BigBum

    BigBum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2018
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,346
    Only two big man left for vet min or 3.6 mil.
    Nene
    Pau Gasol.
     
  18. blahblehblah

    blahblehblah Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,689
    Likes Received:
    3,832
    Thanks for answering! Not sure I'd agree that Rivers/Faried was the reason the Rockets became significantly better from their 11-14 start though. Furthermore more, since both were added on the Vets minimum, both would have been available had the Rockets used their full MLE, resigned Ariza & LMM from the very start. Which is the real point of it all.

    Lastly, I'm guessing/betting that Harden & the Rockets would have made the playoffs without Rivers/Faried lol.
     
  19. Rudyc281

    Rudyc281 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    11,668
    Likes Received:
    9,316
    Kosta koufos
     
  20. BigBum

    BigBum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2018
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,346
    You are right, he has to take minimum, it’s too late.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now