Last year, Portland got off to a great start & was injury free. So they're going to climb 1 spot to #4 ahead of Dallas & Memphis who have Dirk & Gasol healthy (hopefully). That's ridiculous. Based on what our bench looks like, I can see them rating the Rockets that low...on paper. However, they play BB on hardwood instead of paper. Dorsey & Adrien will provide rebounding. Daniels will provide scoring. Ish & Nick Johnson will be ball handlers. I can't wait for the season to start!
Maybe you should? They picked 6 of 8 western conf playoff teams and the Rockets @ #4 last season. They missed Dallas and Portland(they picked DEN and MIN). ESPN Summer Forecast 2013-2014 West They also picked 6 of 8 easterm conf playoff teams. They missed Toronto and Charlotte(they picked NY and CLE). ESPN summer Forecast 2013-2014 East
i think most of us could have done that. picking 6 of 8 playoff teams doesn't sound like a daunting task i think it was a no brainer that the clippers, thunder, rockets, grizzlies, spurs, and warriors would be in. they were all there the year and didn't decline much if at all over the summer
it will be that tight 4-8 difference will be winning and losing winnable games, for example a couple of games i remember we had large leads and lost them, okc and dallas comes immediately to mind, imagine if that happens this year, we're at 49 wins while dallas is at 50, portland at 51
Which is scary given that the Suns and Pelicans (maybe even the Nuggets) are all good. At least one good western team will pick in the lotto this year.
Portland had the healthiest team in NBA history. That's not going to happen again. They also started off with an insanely easy schedule (people predicted their mid-season decline, and they were right). Let's not forget Portland's epic collapse late season. They almost fell out of the playoff race.
ESPN is underrating the Pelicans in my opinion. With Asik added to the mix, Anthony Davis can move over to the 4 spot and will be an MVP candidate next year. The Pelicans should be a playoff team for sure.
I would rate the West like this: 1. OKC 2. Clippers 3. Spurs 4. Warriors 5. Grizzlies 6. Pelicans 7. Blazers 8. Mavericks 9. Rockets 10. Lakers 11. Suns 12. Nuggets 13. Jazz 14. Kings 15. Timberwolves
I don't understand ESPN's love affair with OKC. Year after year they always predict OKC to be the number 1 seed and it just doesn't happen.
And here's another one. Why on earth is OKC ranked above the Clippers? The Clippers have equivalent "star" talent, better bench depth, better coaching, and better ball movement.
I rate OKC higher than Clippers because I feel the Clippers need to beat them in a 7 game series to overcome them mentally. I could say the same about the Spurs, but I think age will finally catch up with San Antonio and they will not risk injury or fatigue for more regular season wins.
Why? The Rockets lost 3 of the top 7 members of their rotation and really only replaced one of them. It's not unreasonable to think they might win 5 fewer games.
They were the #1 seed just two years ago. They were the 2 seed last year, despite Westbrook being out for nearly half the year. Is it really that unrealistic?
2010-2011: #1 Spurs #2 Lakers #3 Dallas #4 OKC 2011-2012: #1 Spurs #2 OKC #3 Lakers #4 Memphis 2012-2013: #1 OKC #2 Spurs #3 Denver #4 Clippers 2013-2014 #1 Spurs #2 OKC #3 Clippers #4 Houston Spurs have been the #1 seed 3 out of the last 4 seasons. It's not a regular thing for OKC to be the #1 seed.
I think 2 of them. They predicted the Lakers to be #1 when Nash/Howard joined (2012-2013). I don't remember the '10-'11 prediction.
Remember this isn't a power rankings list that we're talking about. This is a projected Western conference standings list. They're very different things. It takes a very specific set of skills to reign king in the regular season.