Dick Cheney humiliates Obama in today's Wall Street Journal

What's the content of the message Texx?

 

[-2]

Use of "All they can do is insult" variation is +1 but jeez you are really slipping.

Lets once again review:

No Obama pictures = deduction (since this is basso's expertise, I might re-review point deductions from bigtexxx's account for not meeting the requirements) No use of "pathetic attempt" = deduction. No use of "libpig" = deduction. -3

Step your freaking game up. Remember the election

 

The difference is that this guy who the left hates, STARTED A FREAKING WAR BY PURPOSEFULLY LYING. Some people deserve the consequences of their actions, and Dick Cheney is one of them.

What's hilarious is that anyone would have the nerve to defend this guy, or care one bit what his opinion is. Should we look to Dick Cheney to teach us gun safety? That's how ridiculous this is.

False equivalency is annoying as hell and is one of the right's most played cards.

 

Bobby's continuing charade at pretending not to be a conservative crazy. I laughed.

 

Even FOX bubblehead Megyn Kelley called the content of Cheney's message a fraud. what are you gonna do?

 

It is funny when ignorant people speak as if they know what they are talking about. I'd be willing to bet you've never read an intelligence report in your life yet you speak as if you have insider information and know what goes on behind the scenes.

 

He repeatedly cited debunked intel, even years after it was debunked. It's not inside info, it's public knowledge.

 

Exactly, public knowledge is next to worthless. Also, if you knew anything about the intelligence community, you'd know that there is intelligence on both sides of nearly any issue so you can't call intel "debunked" just because there is other opinions out there.

Anyway, nothing I say is going to stop you from droning on about how politicians with an R next to their name are evil or whatever so rock on. Just remember how ridiculous I think you are when you are responding to one of the Republicans on here who are going to say the same types of things about politicians with a D next to their name. You guys are both ridiculous.

 

Projection is strong with this one.

 

Indeed.

 

Here are the facts.
1. There was no al Qaeda presence in Iraq before the Iraq invasion.
2. Dick Cheney was one of the if not the biggest mastermind of the invasion.
3. Al Qaeda and ISIS, two Islamic fundamentalist organizations, have a heavy presence in Iraq as a result of the war that Dick Cheney wanted and was granted.
4. Dick Cheney, the last person who should criticize anyone about the Iraq situation, blasts the current president for events that transpired as a result of Cheney's war.

If you think this is partisan rhetoric, then that is your problem. Any rational individual would call out Cheney on his hypocrisy. Fox News of all outlets have blasted Cheney for his statements. GLEN BECK now agrees that the initial invasion was a mistake.

 

Concise, factual, and well put.

 

Honestly, any sane rational individual with any sense of morality should be disgusted that a man who's decisions needlessly killed hundreds of thousands of individuals mocks the clean up crew of his mess.

 

And Dick Cheney should be the last person to "consult" Obama.

 

If you want an honest discussion of what you perceive as mistakes by the Obama administration regarding Iraq then you should have left Dick Cheney of all people out of it.

 

Obama has a tough job. The opposing political party wants him to support the overthrow of Syria's president in favor of militant Islamists but they also want him to fight against those same militants in Iraq. So, no matter what Obama does, he will have lost. At least in their minds.

 

Seems unlikely. Anything to back that up?

 

Let me get this straight, I'm supposed to listen to a draft-dodging war criminal's message/opinion about war. Is that kind of like listening to a child molester's opinion on how to raise children?