1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. Watching NBA Action
    It's Mavericks vs. Thunder in Game 1 of the West Semis. Come join Clutch as we're watching NBA playoff action live!

    LIVE: NBA Playoffs!
    Dismiss Notice

Bottom Line: Do you trade Hakeem and/or Charles?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Clutch, Nov 23, 1999.

  1. CBrownFanClub

    CBrownFanClub Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 1999
    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    64
    If I bash anyone, its Charles, but I give him props on that cell-phone stuff. He's right. Score one for Barkley.

    CBrownFanClub
     
  2. heypartner

    heypartner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    62,574
    Likes Received:
    56,317
    Clutch

    What's up with the "freak" comment? Someone with administrator level control to a bbs, and the following that goes along with it, doesn't need to resort to that.

    Are you having trouble enjoying your BBS with a 3-10 record? I think you should go read ChuckyBrown's thread about how "This is great time to be a Rocket's Fan" or something like that. Cheer up man. Let people disagree with you without calling them freaks.

    to respond to your question:

    You seemed to ignore the contradiction you posted, that you stated it takes "years" to develop chemistry. I agreed, but stated we don't have years with Barkley and Olajuwon. I'm awaiting your response to that.

    When I say "years", I don't mean it has to be rebuilt. It can be passed on to the next nucleus. Chemistry is (as Rudy would say) about desire, heart, placing the team above individual accomplishments. That's what leaders pass on. My whole point is the desire, heart, and team focus exudes from Hakeem and Barkley. Hating to lose. Apparently, young players have to be taught that nowadays.

    Think about it: if Reggie Lewis and Len Bias don't die, Boston gracefully moves into a new nucleus post-Bird, retaining their winning attitude--now they are stuck with the flakiness of Walker.

    If Magic doesn't get AIDs, he stays ontop of his game and who knows what happens when they get Shaq in his 15-16th yrs, with Eddie Jones, Elden Campbell and Robert Horry...and possibly still van Exel.

    Clutch....the intangibles that make-up chemistry get passed down through class organizations...once you lose them, it is hard to rebuild that.

    As for talent...We are rebuilding. I'm not status quo. Neither is Rudy...they got Francis, Cato, Anderson, Williams, Massenburg to retool. Personally, I'm amazed at what they were able to achieve last summer.

    Now, if we can just bring these guys up gracefully. I don't want any Marbury or Anfernee's on my team...no matter how well their fantasy stats look like.

    Do you really not believe their could be a valid argument contrary to yours!!!

    cheer up about the season...we are locked in...let's just hope for Cato to wake up and receive more playing time...there are many things I don't agree on with Rudy...but his ability to bring up young players and role players is without flaw!!! I must defer to his decisions on Cato.
     
  3. CBrownFanClub

    CBrownFanClub Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 1999
    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    64
    PS to Clutch: Ralph Sampson rules.
     
  4. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    144
    Clutch:

    Do you think this thread could gradually creep up past the 200 reply milestone? I'll certainly do my part if we can shift off the loyalty issue and back onto the original topic (potential trades as the basis was on <u>PAGE 1</u>). Anyhow, props to you. Great topic.

    ------------------
    "Museum officials outside of Houston have reported an ancient artifact identified as "Rudy's Postup Plays - 1994" stolen, as of November 2, 1999...officials urge residents to contact...
     
  5. CBrownFanClub

    CBrownFanClub Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 1999
    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    64
    I dont understand why everyone wants to shift back to original topics when we are just about to start talking about loyalty to Ralph Sampson. Come on, its just about to get good.
     
  6. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    144
    LOL. Chucky Brown is playing pretty good for the Spurs, BTW. Wouldn't mind having him back.
     
  7. heypartner

    heypartner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    62,574
    Likes Received:
    56,317
    Speaking of loyalty to Ralph Sampson....let's not forget about how we were able to attract the best coach in basketball away from the Celtics to coach him and instill the winnning attitude---Bill Fitch!

    Where is that legend Al McGuire to back us up about this Ralph nostalgia.

    Another test of Rockets loyalty:
    Who was the local sportscaster that talked Ralph into accepting a free-shooting challenge on TV? one of the defining moments of his career.
     
  8. CBrownFanClub

    CBrownFanClub Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 1999
    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    64
    I dont know and I am pissed I dont know. I am gonna guess Dan Patrick, but I think that is wrong. I can only respond with another trivia question:

    What was Ralph Sampson's 1985 biography titled?
     
  9. Clutch

    Clutch Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 1999
    Messages:
    22,660
    Likes Received:
    31,896
    heypartner --

    "What's up with the "freak" comment? Someone with administrator level control to a bbs, and the following that goes along with it, doesn't need to resort to that."

    "stay-put freaks"? This is taboo? Could you not see the clear sarcasm and mockery that that was as you continuously labeled all of us "wholesale trade mongers" and "fantasy-league trade fantasizers"? Get off the high horse.

    Unbelievable amount of insane comparisons followed by ... "Clutch....the intangibles that make-up chemistry get passed down through class organizations...once you lose them, it is hard to rebuild that."

    I think your beliefs on team chemistry are, as CBrownFanClub would say, "wack". Team chemistry is built -- it's not passed over like a golden orb. It still takes talent, guys willing to win, roles being filled... it's not just Larry Bird passing some torch to the next generation. I didn't see that happen with Isiah Thomas, Joe Dumars and the Pistons. No reason at all to think it would have happened with the Lakers -- Magic came back and tried that. The Celtics were falling downhill fast as their main guys retired -- not after.

    Two words: Chicago Bulls.

    And on the flip side... how did Sacramento get so good? Did Corliss Williamson finally shine through after a few years of stability with the organization, or did the drafting of Jason Williams, the signing of Vlade Divac and the acquisition of Chris Webber, all in the same season, have something to do with that?

    You do know Miami was awful before they hired Pat Riley and acquired Alonzo Mourning and Tim Hardaway, don't you?

    Is Vancouver a "bad and classless organization" because they haven't clicked big time on the court? I tell you what -- I think they're headed in the right direction.

    Lets not get out of control here -- the Rockets built chemistry the right way and added pieces as they went along. It started with Hakeem and Otis in 88-89. Hakeem was 27-28 at the time -- Otis 28. They had the luxury of adding pieces. They added Vernon Maxwell the next year (25-26 years old at the time). Kenny Smith the next year (26 years old at the time). Robert Horry two years later. They tried all kinds of combinations -- Mike Woodson, Walter Berry, Sleepy Floyd, Buck Johnson... it took them a good 6 years to find that right combo. It wasn't until 1992-93 they really started to kick tail, and it bounced over to the next season.

    The Rockets had the luxury of putting good, solid, (and here's the key word for you) young pieces together. You can retain that if you continuously bring in young players or young veterans, but the Rockets went for gold. They started to bring in veterans to keep going for one more shot at the ring, as well as various role players and now they pay for that.

    I'll admit it ... I want a shortcut to the bottom of the hill. I don't like the fact that the walk down is slow when I can see it and I know we can take the elevator quickly and begin the slow walk back up again.

    Or we can sit down right now heypartner, do nothing, laugh at the bottom-feeders and get crushed by the ones on the top.

    "Are you having trouble enjoying your BBS with a 3-10 record?"
    "Do you really not believe their could be a valid argument contrary to yours!!!"

    Now you're just attacking the messenger and getting personal. I think I am more than willing to admit when I am wrong, and I've been wrong several times in the past as others could point out. It's times like these I realize I'm dealing with a child and I apologize to everyone for responding a few times with this one.

    Mulder --

    "IMHO, trading Hakeem would give us more leverage, although it would kill me to see him in another uniform."

    My sentiments to a tee. Thanks for the backing also ...

    DREAMer --

    I would keep the dog.

    But what if you were in the security business?

    CBrownFanClub --

    Well put post, and I can see your point. I think there is one fundamental difference though in what I was assuming would be a good, mutual parting of ways for both parties and your vision of "breaking the mirror". Keep in mind -- I'm not saying and have never said do it tomorrow. My point is if this keeps up and by trading deadline time it is apparent the playoffs are not in the Rockets' future this season. I think all along I have thought, or better yet expected, that future Hall of Famers like Chuck and Dream would want to be on contending, winning teams to end their careers. If the Rockets can't turn this around and provide that, why not do the mutually beneficial thing? It's not like Hakeem Olajuwon won't forever be known as a Houston Rocket. I think several people have way too many negative connotations with the word "trade".

    Think about this: What if Hakeem wanted a trade? Wouldn't your views actually be seen as selfish as opposed to loyal?

    PS. Mario Elie could kick Chucky Brown's ass any day of the week. [​IMG]

    ------------------
    Clutch
    Out to prove Scottie Pippen will apologize at gunpoint.
    www.clutchcity.net
     
  10. CBrownFanClub

    CBrownFanClub Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 1999
    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    64
    Yeah, but Mario could kick, like anyone's ass because he is wicked pissed off all the time for no reason, which is awesome. Chucky, on the other hand, is wicked happy all the time for even less of a good reason, which is also awesome. Those guys are total pals in SA, by the way.

    I'll compromise and trade Barkley to LA mid-season for Horry straight up. Just as a reminder that it was a bad trade to begin with and we are cutting our losses. Maybe some draft picks to Miami. I can part with Barkley, you could spin that one as 'good for everyone.' Trading Hakeem is too much like Shel Silverstein's "The Giving Tree" for me. Just sad and bloodsucking. Yuck. But Barkley, fine, let him orchestrate the trade. Maybe we could trade him to whoever is winning the last game of the Finals with 30 seconds left so he can get a ring. Which means we may end up with Pippen again. Again, yuck.

    Hakeem may very well want a trade, but I believe he is no longer of sound mind - like Mario and Chucky - and I do not care what he wants. It is what I want him to want that matters to me. We know what he needs, and that is important. He will thank us later.

    CBrownFanClub
     
  11. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    144
    Hakeem may very well want a trade, but I believe he is no longer of sound mind - like Mario and Chucky - and I do not care what he wants. It is what I want him to want that matters to me. We know what he needs, and that is important. He will thank us later.

    OH MAN!! PUT THAT UP ON THE FRONT OF THIS SITE, LOLOLOLOL!!!
     
  12. heypartner

    heypartner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    62,574
    Likes Received:
    56,317
    CB--
    I threw you off by saying "sportscaster". I meant sportswriter. local.

    best out of 10 free throws. Sampson made 7. ..not enough of course.
     
  13. CBrownFanClub

    CBrownFanClub Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 1999
    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    64
    Christmas. . . Blinebury? I give up.
     
  14. Plowman

    Plowman Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    12,314
    Likes Received:
    13,253
    Let me preface this by saying that if this team was being used properly,we wouldn't even be having this conversation....
    Barring a change in philosophy(which I can't help but feel will happen EVENTUALLY),here's an answer:

    If there was any question that Dream will
    retire a Rocket that has already been answered.YES,HE IS A HOUSTON INSTITUTION and some things and people are sacred.Chuck on the other hand while having trade value is probably doomed to play out his days here, do to his 9 mil. and salary cap problems involved in a would be trade.
    Don't get me wrong,we have taken care of our weaknesses:point guard and interior defense
    We have a very balanced team(minus a veteran pt.)....lots of talent.......LET THEM PLAY
     
  15. heypartner

    heypartner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    62,574
    Likes Received:
    56,317
    kenny hand 8-10

    Why Sampson even accepted, shows his character.


    clutch
    oops...the bbs comment deserves apology. for some reason, i feel like i'm apologizing to a sportswriter, who should be used to it. but i realize your an fanatic volunteer....i'm a fanatic user (i guess). nice board....sorry man. this is far funner place to gab than espn or newsgroups.

    i'm sure we will be agreeing and disagreeing again in the future. Let me introduce myself....I LOVE THIS GAME. I LOVE SEEING IT LIVE. I really can't even follow other sports anymore.

    My pet peeve is having discussions about player personnel moves that haven't happened...I enjoy talking the game and what i see on the court. That's why I like to make sarcastic remarks about Fantasy Baskbatball-type discussions. It's not personal until I realize there's a person reading it on the other end who's not getting paid for their remarks. sorry.

    Admit one thing about this thread...you are challenging Rudy and Carrol Dawson's track record of excellent player personnel moves. That I gave up doing long ago.

    My interest is seeing how well they groom Cato and Francis. I don't know what's up with Cato...falling for headfakes, not getting clean boards. He lacks fundamentals. But I disgress into another thread.

    I LOVE THIS GAME.

    cheers.
     
  16. DREAMer

    DREAMer Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    2,173
    Likes Received:
    2
    I've already said I'm against losing either Barkley or Hakeem. BUT, I have a question for all those posters who would be for getting rid of one or both. Choose your answer from one of the following:

    A. Are you just as willing
    B. A little more willing
    C. A little less willing
    D. More willing
    E. Less willing
    F. Much more willing
    G. Much less willing

    Which of the above most represents your feeling about getting a different head coach, assuming Rudy is kept in the organization in some capacity, instead of getting rid of Hakeem and/or Barkley?

    ------------------
    I have a dream.........his name's Hakeem.
     
  17. Finalfantasy

    Finalfantasy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 1999
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    1
    Somehow I don't see the excellent personel record of Rudy and Dawson that no one should challenge. You mean Scottie Pippen and Matt Baloney?
     
  18. Francis3

    Francis3 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 1999
    Messages:
    3,640
    Likes Received:
    3
    Is this the most posts in a topic?
     
  19. SamCassell

    SamCassell Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    8,859
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    DREAMer, I dont think the "Fire Rudy" argument comes from the same perspective as the "Trade Dream / Barkley" argument. Firing Rudy is saying, "We're a good team, and could contend if we had a coach who knew how to use our talents." Trading one of the older stars is really only valuable if you adopt the (to me terribly fatalistic and sad) belief that we have a bad team and are doomed to mediocrity at best, and the only way to get better is to get worse 1st.

    For the record, I'm against either changing coaches or trading CB4 or Dream. It's only 13 games into the season, and I think those kind of moves are a little hotheaded and reactionary at this point. Let things play themselves out, and watch the ship level itself. Mebbe pick up Derek Harper and/or Sam Mack to fill our needs. I see us going 45-37 on the season, finishing strong. I think we are capable of surviving without hitting bottom, thanks to an already-young nucleus of Francis, Cato, Shandon, and Mobley. They should be able to assume more responsibility as first Chuck and then Dream retires. In 18 mo or so we will have a hell of alot of cap room, to get a decent big man to round out that young group.

    I think its unfair to fire Rudy when he is trying to mesh a new team, with 7 new players (3 of them starters), 13 games into the season. If the team underperforms all year, then can his @$$ after the season.

    As for rebuilding, it is not necessarily a winning formula. Look at the Clips. The Mavs. The Grizz. The Wiz. The Warriors. The Nets. The Cavs. If we "drop the elevator" as Clutch suggests, we could never get back.
     
  20. bballfanatic

    bballfanatic Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 1999
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    1
    No you don't. Let the young guys learn from them. If Charles wants to go somewhere else for the chance at a ring, I would not hold a grudge (like I do against Pippen). Dream wants to retire here and I think that should be respected besides he too is still good. It's not as much loyalty as class and respect to let him retire as a Rocket. He has paid his dues.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now