Mallet gives us a better chance at the #1 pick. Hoyer could **** around and look competent for a game and beat Jax or Ten once.
A few sayings that serves as advice to you: Take the L and move on Charge it to the game I thought Mallett would be decent and better than Hoyer. I was with you. I was wrong. Mallett sucks. Idc if Foster dropped the ball. It doesn't seem like a coincidence that so many dropped balls occur with Mallett. Hoyer is better. Mallett is better if you want to tank.
It really doesn't matter one way or the other, the season is lost. If we get to see Hoyer keep making stupid decisions and throwing picks, great. If we get to see Mallett throw the ball off of his guys' hands leading to picks, great. It really doesn't matter. I guess those in the Hoyer crowd can be happy that he's the one that currently will be blowing games for the Texans, but I just don't see how that matters at this point.
When you're wrong, it doesn't matter. Conveniently. Not as bad as new info, but close. What about our best WR corpse ever? Doesn't matter either?
We would have had a better chance to win games if we stuck with Hoyer. BoB actually thinks like a fan in hindsight. We had a better chance of being 2-3, 3-2 with Hoyer. He can make the "simple" throws. Mallett can't.
I disagree, Hoyer can't handle pressure at all, he looked pretty good against a Colts defense that can't pressure the QB but still ended up Hoyering the game away.....of course that doesn't mean that Mallett is any good, just that Hoyer is terrible against any team with even a token pass rush. The Colts have one of the worst pass rushes in the NFL, and he still managed to screw up. The Dolphins game will probably be his best game because they have almost nothing resembling a pass rush, but the Jags could beat us because they have an average pass rush....should be all it takes. The real question is if the Jags double their season interception total or triple it next week.
Both QB's are not good. They have had their good and bad moments, so going back and forth about the two is nonsense. Last season the Jag's beat up on Hoyer pretty darn good. That game I believe was by far his worse ever as a pro. Hopefully he have some redemption in his heart and go out there and play the best football of his life.
Mallett's handling of the pressure is terrible. He's immobile and getting the ball out quickly while throwing at the turf doesn't count.
And don't forget, when assessing BOB's handling of the QB situation, he let Ryan Fitzpatrick - who was pretty good last year - walk for Brian Hoyer. And while I defended Hoyer as a possibly younger Ryan Fitzpatrick at a similar career crossroads, I think we can now safely declare that a significant downgrade. This team is in a MUCH better place if the plan had been the job is Mallett's to lose heading into the offseason; let's see how he handles it.
Actually Hoyers stats are pretty similar to Fitzpatricks with and without BOB. 90+ QBrating with, 80 without. Fitz is back down to 80, interestingly enough. They both have mind boggling turnovers. The problem here is BOB quadruple guessing himself
Yep; so he likely saw Hoyer as having greater upside. I understood the move. In hindsight, I don't think it was a good one. Again, I keep going back to flabbergasted... BOB's handling of the QB situation from this offseason to the present is legitimate fodder to wonder if he was the right hire; it's a certified CF.
You are an absolute fool. GTFO. Why don't you call your boy Mallett and wake him up. Your stupidity is beyond predictable. The entire BBS knew you'd wait till something went wrong to try and look smart. Your boy is about to be cut.
