Paul had the better speech but then his answers to the questions were total BS. I'm glad Nicole won and not "your boi." I think Paul was the most annoying house guest of the past few years if not of all time and based on what I saw on after dark etc he lied was truly nasty behind peoples backs with his opinions of them, not in a game play way but in a personal way. He said he showed his cards and played true to himself and if that is really the case then he's a true douche nozzle.
Watched it last night (instead of the 2nd half of Texans game....) and was SHOCKED Paul didn't win. I guess calling Michelle the C word cost him 500K. He was clearly the best player, but not being a complete a-hole is part of the game too, so........
Glad Paul didn't win. I think he deserved to win based on gameplay, but I think he's a douchebag also. I also love how his reasoning for eliminating James was due to James not being loyal to him when he wasn't really loyal to anyone during the entire game. Once he was in danger, he betrayed his "boys" every time. I don't necessarily think keeping James would have won it for him, but I think he had a better shot. James basically won nothing the entire time, I think the house would have been more likely to let Paul win due to his gameplay. I do agree with others that say that the house mostly voted based off emotion. I don't have a problem with that though, part of the game is not making too many enemies in the jury house. Paul made quite a few. I'm kind of surprised James voted for Paul after him costing him 50-500k. I certainly wouldn't have. He damn sure wouldn't have been hugging me and apologizing immediately afterwards either.
Nicole clearly needed the money more too. Paul's family is clearly wealthy and his spoiled brat persona cost him the game. I only wish Vic could have survived to the finals. I'm sure he would have been a unanimous pick.
