1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

BBC: Pentagon Iraq strategy 'failing'

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Fegwu, Sep 30, 2004.

  1. Fegwu

    Fegwu Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    5,162
    Likes Received:
    4
    By Nick Childs
    BBC's Pentagon correspondent



    A key element of the current US strategy in Iraq, the training of Iraqi forces, is still proceeding too slowly, a new report by a US think-tank says. Iraqis will not be able to take over the most demanding security roles until late 2005-06, the Center for Strategic and International Studies' report says.

    The report was published by a respected military analyst, Anthony Cordesman.

    Many experts have said that the Pentagon does not have an effective strategy to deal with the insurgency.


    Even Bush administration officials regularly concede these days that the violence in Iraq has increased and that it could, and may even be likely, to get worse still as the planned election there gets closer.

    Pentagon's headache

    A former Pentagon official, Mr Cordesman is now a senior analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.


    Violence can get worse as the poll draws closer, experts say

    His report says it will be a race to have enough Iraqi security forces ready in time for January's planned election.

    Behind the scenes Pentagon officials say what's unfolding on the ground in Iraq at the moment is a mixed approach to the insurgency depending on local circumstances in different areas.

    Political negotiations in one location, air strikes and other types of military operations in, say, parts of Baghdad, and a waiting game in other areas, preparing for more Iraqi security forces to become available.

    But if those forces aren't going to be ready in sufficient numbers in time, both to take on and, more importantly, to hold some of the more sensitive trouble spots, what's the calculation then?

    Might it be feasible to put off further large scale military action and perhaps accept that it won't be possible to hold an election in the worst trouble spots?

    Or would that be a sign of weakness that only adds to the momentum of the insurgency?

    In which case, does some form of new offensive with all its attendant risks have to take place?

    For the US military and the Iraqi authorities, the political and military equation isn't getting any easier.


    Link
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now