1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Baseball Spy Game

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by jim1961, Oct 22, 2018.

  1. bobrek

    bobrek Politics belong in the D & D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 1999
    Messages:
    36,288
    Likes Received:
    26,639
    I see absolutely no problem with stealing signs using old fashioned methods. Essentially, watch what the other team signs and deduce what the signs mean without using anything other than the players/coaches eyes on the field. No one in the press box. No one in the stands. Just the guys in the dugout or on the field.
     
  2. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    17,575
    Likes Received:
    13,469
    For me at least, these changes didnt alter the look of the game.

    I didn't say it was impossible. Like Seal said, I just think the push back by traditionalist will slow the progress.

    Valid point.
     
  3. Nick

    Nick Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    48,199
    Likes Received:
    14,431
    No longer forcing pitchers to throw 4 pitches to intentionally walk a guy changes the look. Having umpires get on headsets for almost every close play, every scoring play, every "rules clarification", even for seeing if guys were hit by pitches certainly changes the look of the game.

    After last night's 18 inning debacle (yes, when guys are just trying to hit HR's every AB in extras, its a debacle)... I'm fully ready to have a runner at 2B to start the inning if the game goes into the 12th.

    What's most important (and least realized around here), is that the game looks vastly different now than what it was when most of the modern elements were implemented.... constant pitching changes, mound visits, sign relaying, specialists of all types. The proposed changes being discussed will just be another version of evolution of the game.
     
  4. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    17,575
    Likes Received:
    13,469
    Although I realize it, I admit its happened gradually enough that ive adapted to how things are now better than some others may have.

    For the record, I am not against evolution in principle. I have just elucidated some of its potential impediments.
     
  5. Nick

    Nick Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    48,199
    Likes Received:
    14,431
    There will always be opponents to change.

    Not too long ago, people were dead set against using any sort of replay. Then, when they saw how many close calls there actually were/game, they all reversed course and called for an expansion of what can and cannot be reviewable.

    I expect the same sort of blowback when the pitch clock and batters box step out violations are enforced.

    I actually think the extra inning rule change is perfect. All other sports treat their overtime differently... (hockey, basketball is only 5 minutes, football, etc) and baseball should evolve that as well.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now