Of course they are, they're all DD. The entire board consists of DD, Rockets2K, Clutch, you and Asidd_1990.
Says the guy registered in 2011. So DD got banned because he used another screen name, but "False" is obviously also a second, third, or fourth handle.
Look Jackie, I've been lurking here since 2000 maybe early 2001. I never registered because I preferred to read and because frankly I had nothing to say. Still, I liked reading the stuff people wrote, and learning what I could. Having Trade Jorge come back for a hurrah makes me remember the halcyon days back before 75% of what you posted was exclusively about Muslims and where Macbeth would make up preposterous tales of his own exploits. It also makes me think back on how interesting it has been observing the shifting opinions of posters who used to identify as Republicans who have now been left behind by a party which has become even more homogeneous in its viewpoint. It has also been fascinating observing the initially sanguine reactions to war in the Middle East and war on Iraq shift into stark disapproval. I slightly miss the community provided by the old personalities, though the dynamic has always pretty much been the same - the D&D continues to be the best board.
Create fake schtick account to back up ANOTHER fake schtick account then create ANOTHER fake schtick account to back up the new one and then create ANOTHER fake schtick account to back up the others and so on to infinity and beyond. It hasn't jumped the shark yet though, still generates a ton of replies and rep.
Please you need to let this bit go. It makes you look silly. TJ - I, too have met with a bunch of Mexican industrialists lately but I always try my hardest to stay out of your path. I know not to attempt business around your turf. You are central and west, right?
Andymoon has demanded the right of satisfaction under the code duello on an internet rival, an actual living breathing person -not an unholy amalgamated sock puppet being perpetrated as a cleverrr ruse by certain participantssss - whose existence has been verified. The only one who is looking silly is you. An old fashioned antebellum style debate in public, likely under oxford union rules, requiring the physical presence of various actors, is in the natural course in the present circumstance, and the failure of one to occur allows for the drawing of negative inferences.
looking for WMDs ?? Maybe under here <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mdDp_jlgC9M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdDp_jlgC9M 3 years is about right for trading fraud. I thought for sure you might be madoff. Maybe they just gave you posting rights from leavenworth. IGNORE FEATURE REACTIVATED /romney lol are you kidding?? LANDSLIDE ACTIVATED
I believe you were the one who chickened out when someone challenged you to a "physical presence" encounter.
WAIT WHAT YOU JUST BLEW MY MIND AND ARE FORCING ME TO RE-THINK STRONGLY HELD BELIEFS ZOMGS XXX THE POSITION THAT INTERNET FIGHTS SHOULD BE FOLLOWED UP ON OFFLINE IS NOW A SORE SUBJECT TO ME MENTION IT NO FURTHER VRRRT
Aside from the fact that the guy who issued that challenge appeared to be slightly insane, I would have paid to view the encounter. I would also like to see FFB vs. BJ and would pay-per-view for it. Swoly vs. DD I would also single-handedly take on the Islamist brigade (e.g. Mathloom, adeelsiddiqui, Hydhypedplaya, trustme, etc.).
All you have to do is take me up on my nearly decade old challenge to avoid the apt and earned moniker of THE COWARD.
You have to admit that getting kicked in the nuts by a mule is WAY more entertaining than being disemboweled, Braveheart style.
