Double Elimination Bracket Winner's Bracket Spoiler HTML: A--Bluf-| (9-------| B--Jamr-| | (21-------| C---YSL-| | | M--RY93-| (5-------| | (1---RedN-| | N--RedN-| (29-------| D--Hory-| | | (10------| | | E--dhar-| | | | (22-------| | F--JMCB-| | | O--RR14-| (6-------| | (2---RR14-| | P--Phoe-| {35------------------ G--torq-| | WINNER OF WINNER’S (11------| | BRACKET H--ICDY-| | | (23-------| | I--Red2-| | | | Q---VBG-| (7-------| | | (3----VBG-| | | R--123R-| (30-------| J---rpr-| | (12------| | K---DrW-| | | (24-------| L--thng-| | S--Rick-| (8-------| (4--------| T--Spon-| Loser's Bracket Spoiler HTML: L21-------| L30-------| L1--RY93-| | | (13--------| (25-------| | L11-------| (17--------| | (33-------| | | | | L7--------| | | | (31-------| | L22-------| | | L2--Phoe-| | | | (14--------| (26-------| | L12-------| (18--------| | | | L8--------| | (36--------| L23-------| | | L3--123R-| | | | (15--------| (27-------| | | L9-------| (19--------| | | | | | | | L5--------| | | | (32-------| | (37----------------- L24-------| | | | | WINNER OF LOSER’S L4-------| | | (34-------| | BRACKET (16--------| (28-------| | | L10-------| (20--------| | | | L29-------| | L6--------| L35---------| Finals: Spoiler HTML: WINNER OF WINNER’S BRACKET:------------| | (38--------------| | | WINNER OF LOSER’S BRACKET:-------------| (39 | L38-------------| (IF 1ST LOSS) Legend: A, B, C, D, (and so forth) - Random seeding. 12 teams will have byes, 8 will not. (# - This is the game number. This is the order in which the games will be play, voted on. L# - This is the loser placement in the loser bracket. If you lost "(1", your team would then go to L1
I'm thinking I might start Teague and have Jennings come off the bench. Teague / Jennings Harden Durant / Batum Gasol Monroe / Dalembert What y'all think?
Nah, I think this is a good pace. It's the playoffs, shouldn't further clutter the dish with these. IMO, one round a weeks would be good so we could do a round, let it die, and do another.
Early season Spencer Hawes destroys Perkins IMO. He was really good defensively, grabbing rebounds and controlling the offense from the high post (with CP3 you don't need that as much) But Hawes got hurt relatively early and his hot start disappeared and the Sixers disappeared as well.
Completely agree with you. If he continues to play like he did tonight I think he'll get some more value in voting. Think I'll just switched depending on who is the center. Right now with perk starting I feel like okc lite.
The only thing is your offensive spacing with those 3 bigs isn't great at all. Faried has no jump shot, Parsons is inconsistent and lol Perkins offense. Hawes gives you more flexibility there. CP3 + Ginobili - ultimate flopping. Ultimate court vision.