1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Climate Change] Lake Erie up to 60% Covered in Ice

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Cohete Rojo, Jan 13, 2015.

  1. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
  2. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,046
    Stop embarrassing yourself.
     
  3. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    43,367
    Likes Received:
    25,374
    Great cherry picking with your sources. Bravo.

    I like your style of winning the battle yet losing the war.
     
  4. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    54,072
    Likes Received:
    42,069
    Actually your own source in the other thread states that climate change might be playing a role.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/weath...69/?siteID=je6NUbpObpQ-rD5QMKUQjjmCP3j4NONhtw

    [rquoter]Some outside climate scientists criticized the report, saying it didn't take into effect how record warmth worsened the drought.

    "The authors of the new report would really have us believe that is merely a coincidence and has nothing to do with the impact of human-caused climate change?" Penn State meteorologist Michael Mann wrote Monday in The Huffington Post. "Frankly, I don't find that even remotely plausible."

    Mann said the NOAA report focuses primarily on the lack of precipitation, not the unusually high temperatures measured in the oceans as well as across California.

    "This study completely fails to consider what climate change is doing to water in California," wrote Kevin Trenberth, head of climate analysis at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. He said the work "completely misses" how hotter air increases drying by evaporating more of it from the ground.[/rquoter]

    Anyway I did you some credit for that even if it seems like you didn't read through the whole article.
     
  5. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    54,072
    Likes Received:
    42,069
    Especially since I have said that weather isn't the same thing as climate.
    http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showpost.php?p=9545812&postcount=361
     
  6. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918
    There's a million scientific peer-reviewed sources out there. You simply choose to ignore them and instead believe people who know nothing about what they are talking about.

    Honestly, it's the closed-minded brainwashed kind of thinking you exhibit which is the epitome of what is wrong with this country. Your vote on issues is a vote of total ignorance and backwardness. You might as well follow-the sharia law because you are on that level with the kind of thinking you exhibit. You really do share the indoctrinated rigidity of people who believe in conspiracy theories and total nonsense that has been disproven for years and years.

    Very sad indeed.
     
  7. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    25,419
    Likes Received:
    13,294
    what i dont understand is the "indoctrinated rigidity" i suppose someone learning about different issues and people changing their views over time is a fluid situation over time.

    it seems though that some people do not have the ability to look at overwhelming facts and even begin to change their minds.
     
  8. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Sounds like a debate. Like I said: there are many uncertainties.

    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4ns13IhmDm8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  9. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    It is not cherry picking. The National Climate Assessment is only citing heat waves in the northern hemisphere, mainly at mid-latitudes. That shouldn't be too surprising since the Arctic has been warming much quicker than any other region.

     
  10. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Garbage in, garbage out. It took me 5 minutes to find this:

    Wow, not a strong case for any increase in frequency or increase in strength of tropical storms. Sounds like a wash to me. Keep trying, bruh.
     
  11. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918
    I was talking about global warming, not tropical storms. There's not a consensus on the impact global warming will have on hurricanes.

    There IS a near consensus on the fact global warming is happening. Denying global warming is what makes you crazy, nothing to do with hurricanes. In fact, it's really bizarre that you are even bringing up tropical cyclones.
     
  12. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Nice straw man. I've spent the entirety of this thread citing NASA, NOAA, IPCC and others. You chose to ignore all of that in favor of debate something that isn't there, likely brought on by your stereotypical views of the world. How sad.

    As if there aren't uncertainties:

     
  13. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918

    you just post links to reports and random graphs and charts with no explanation or context.

    Is this a joke?
     
  14. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    20,999
    Likes Received:
    12,870
    Explain the chart you posted in your own words please.
     
  15. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Nothing is out of context or random. The graphic is a straightforward illustration of the magnitude, uncertainty and level of scientific confidence in the assessment of each anthropogenic forcing component. According to NASA, the study of the direct effects is an "immature science", the quantification of indirect effects has only been undertaken in recent years, and a majority of climate models that were used to compile the IPCC's AR4 were totally incapable of fully accommodating both the direct and indirect effects of all aerosols. Even by James Hansen's admission the numbers for estimating aerosol impacts at IPCC's AR4 were "pulled out of a hat".

    Cloud physics by NASA's and the IPCC's admission are complex and poorly understood. There really aren't satellites with sensors that can detect the aerosols within clouds. While many advances in aerosol science have been made in the past decades, it is still the largest source of uncertainty regarding the anthropogenic effects. I tell you what, NASA is full of great introductory material into this kind of stuff. Y'all ought to give it a read sometime:

     
  16. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,897
    Likes Received:
    36,467

    This guy Bill Patzert is soembody you consider an authority on climate science?

    Very good. How do you account for this?


     
  17. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Bill is well researched on this topic. Anthropogenic greenhouse gas do exert a warming force on the planet. I will also agree with him on some of the points he addresses in his 2013 interview with LA Magazine.


    rocketsjudoka pointed out that the southwest US is expected to undergo a massive drought throughout this century. But as Patzert points out, it is not due to global warming. Patzert points out that land use change is also the big driver of regional warming and regional climate change. The drought is not caused by man-made global warming.

    Y’all do at least acknowledge that there has been climate change during the presence of homosapiens? This isn’t all do to humans.
     
  18. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918
    You can talk about deserts and cold snaps and rain all you want, but the scientific data and consensus is that the current climate change we are experiencing is caused by mankind. The science is solid. It's not based on droughts or anything like that, it's based on SCIENCE. That is, the scientific method which is a rigorous process that takes years and years of consistent results that are reproducible and verified through predictions that come out of theory.

    In this case, nearly all the scientific predictions from manmade global warming have come true. For instance, climate science predicted that if global warming was manmade and real, we would see the increase in temperatures happen at night, not during the day. This is now confirmed to be true.

    Climate change doesn't predict the weather - droughts or hurricanes or anything like that. That's not what the key is here really - the key is that we are dumping a lot of C02 into the atmosphere and it is raising the temperature of the planet which will have broad ranging impact. What is that impact and the fact that it will have impact are entirely different discussions.

    Ok?
     
  19. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Source, bruh. What is your source for all this doom-and-gloom that Al Gore keeps preaching?
     
  20. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918
    It's not what Al Gore is preaching dude - you keep making this about politics. It's science and the scientific community that is raising the alarm. It's study after study. It's all out there - you quote some of it in fact in this very thread. So weird.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now