Hillary Clinton leaves 9/11 Memorial early due to medical issue?

Well put.

 

Because it looks like the squeeze my finger test and if it is the squeeze my finger test then obviously she has a condition worse than pneumonia.

 

Low-stage pneumonia* or whatever.

Point is it looks like she's not healthy and the Dems aren't telling the whole truth about it.

 

What? That makes no sense. If she's doing the squeeze my finger test, she could be testing how close to passing out Hillary was. We already know that she was woozy and weak in the knees. Supposedly that was caused by dehydration and heat sensitivity which could be magnified by having pneumonia.

So a squeeze the finger test, proves nothing at all, and has no bearing on whether Hillary was telling the truth or lying. Are you guys this far down in the grasping at straws game already?

 

That's all I wanted to hear.

 

There is nothing these people will not say, literally no lie they will not tell.

 

The world is out to get you Mojoman.

 

I think it's pretty pathetic this is what amounts to conservatism.... A sprinkle of TMZ and a whole bunch of theatrics and hyperboles. Who knew so many conservatives were thespians?

 

Whatever famalam.

 

You spout off about people lying a lot. Yet you have provided zero proof that Hillary is suffering from anything other than pneumonia.

I'm still waiting on that. You obviously can't provide it. You've already been burned once for falling the undercover nurse/physician bit that was being spread. Somebody lied to you about that one, and you bought it hook line and sinker. And the only people you are calling liar are the ones who believe the best available evidence.

When you can man up and provide evidence that Hillary is lying about her health I'll be happy to believe it. I'm still waiting.

 

I think the burden of proof is on Hilary who has been caught lying one more than a few occasions. The fact that they first said it was a heat stroke, and then changed the story to pneumonia, doesn't bode well. The stack of evidence is making it so that anyone who uses Occam's razor, would have to lean toward her health is a question now.

The presidency is not a normal position, and she is 68. I want you to go back and look at how much this has aged past presidents. The job is so stressful it, it actually makes people age faster. Look at Bush, Obama and Clinton, and this has held true.

 

she won't complete 4 years if she's elected and she knows it. in her mind, she'll be the worst woman potus which is the only thing she cares about. her ego wants it bad.

 

11 step standard leftist response to any scandal involving Clinton.

Step 1. Ridicule even the notion of a problem
Step 2. There is no proof!!!!11!1
Step 3. Deny Deny Deny
Step 4. (Proof comes out) That's not verified! (goalposts move)
Step 5 Downplay evidence. (goalposts move some more)
Step 6. Right wing witch hunt!!1111!!
Step 7. Conspiracy hunters!11!!1
Step 8. Racists! Mysogynists! Homophobics! Islamaphobist!
Step 9. Distract/Deflect.
A -- (Donald Trump hasn't released his tax returns)
B -- (What about David Duke?)
C -- (Trump is in Russia's pocket!!!)
D -- (Fill in blank to distract/deflect)
Step 10. Hillary receives way more scrutiny than anyone ever has! Unfair!
Step 11. Can't we just move on from this? This has been investigated extensively.

 

LMFAO! This is a "scandal"?

 

Step 1.

 

Except none of that really fits this scenario. I'm not denying there could be a problem. I'm saying that right now the best evidence is that the problem is pneumonia.

So step 1 is out.

Step 2 is correct. So far we haven't seen any proof. But there is nothing wrong and everything correct about asking for proof when someone makes a claim without any evidence to back it up.

Step 3. Not denying anything that is backed by evidence.

step 4. It hasn't happened. No proof has come out.

So it ends there.

So let me ask you, do you think it's wrong to go with the best evidence available until more evidence comes out as opposed to simply believing claims being made with no evidence to back it up?

 

Donald Trump has been caught lying on more than a few occasions as well. That doesn't mean any charge the people make against him should be seen as true until he can prove it's not.

That idea is ridiculous.

Also they initially said it was due to heat and dehydration which was not completely forthcoming. It wasn't false because the theory is that it was exacerbated by the pneumonia.

The burden of proof is always on people making the claim. Trying to justify a system where any charge is valid until the accused can prove it isn't goes against the principals of our justice system. It's also silly.

 

Great post. We have seen literally all of that and a good bit more.

These people have compromised their integrity so severely that they are truly unbelievable now. There is nobody else to blame for that. They have done it to themselves.

 

Burden of proof of conspiracy theories is on Clinton? Dang.