Trump 2016: Yes. We. Can.

I've noticed that all of the attractive Republican women tv pundits dislike Trump. Something to think about.

 

I have no sane reason to feel this, but I'm actually starting to feel sorry for Trump. Of course, I'm not voting for him, but I just think he's in way over his head. The whole political thing is just not his arena. I don't know if he's a bad person, per se- I just think he's probably like a lot of people, there's some good in him but his bad is being magnified x1000. He brings it all on himself, but after you see so many links on CNN, Yahoo, etc. all negative Trump, it almost has this effect of making you feel bad for him.

Of course, then I think about his wealth, and his wife- and that losing this election will have zero effect on him b/c I think he'd much rather be negotiating business deals- he'll go back to his corporate world- and then I guess there's really no reason to feel sorry for him.

 

Donald trump even lied about the NFL writing him a letter lol. This guy lies about everything.

 

They jealous of his hot European wife.

How else could they visibly dislike a man who was notably less disgusting to women at the workplace than their former boss?

 

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">VIDEO: Trump on why he had right to attack Khan <a href="https://t.co/WDcCABAnlL">https://t.co/WDcCABAnlL</a></p>&mdash; Eddie Vale (@evale72) <a href="https://twitter.com/evale72/status/760630556556230656">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Spoiler

 

Thanks Obama!

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uqhzWlqN3uc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I thought this was the case from the beginning, but it's possible that since he's gotten further than even he expected, he's just going to run with it.

 

If Khan was a random grieving father of a soldier then that's one thing but Khan was paid by DNC to attack Trump. He was there to attack Trump and honestly now that I see the big picture if Trump didn't respond back he would've probably lost my vote.

 

Hah, "now that I see the big picture."

I swear, these blind Trump fanboys are cut from the same cloth as those pseudo-libertarian conspiracy whack jobs who call rational-thinking individuals "sheeple". Objectively stupid people who are convinced that they've figured out some truth that everybody else has managed to miss.

 

It's evolution man. Some are a few steps behind others.

 

This article has helped me begin to understand what is going on in these billies' heads.

Trump: Tribune Of Poor White People

 

How does that explain RL though? That brain fart is Persian.

 

He's an internet message board character, just like Bobby, Jorge, Tex, etc.

 

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...g-cites-the-wrong-place.html?via=twitter_page

Trump got confused about where he was speaking.

 

This whole campaign would provide for a great series of Southwest Airlines, "Wanna Get Away?" ads.

 

First (and probably last) post in D&D, but anybody know who programmed this magnificently impressive bot RL? Was it IBM, or Microsoft, maybe Google? Whoever it was, I need to get in on the stock, because the technology is uber amazing.

And if you are not a bot, and a person that is actually posting out of your own free will, I have genuine pity on you RL, and I hope that you get better soon. Just like Trump, it was entertaining to a certain extent initially, but then it becomes really, really sad.

 

:grin:

Well done with this...

 

http://xpostfactoid.blogspot.com/2016/08/obama-called-trump-unfit-for-presidency.html

This blog post makes an interesting observation: When Obama called Trump "unfit to serve as POTUS," absolutely NO GOP officials came to Trump's defense. This despite the fact that it is pretty rare, and viewed as a little in appropriate, for a sitting President to say this about one of the major party candidates.

Now why is this?

Maybe the Trump supporters here need to think about it.


Also, more great news:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Good news, travelers, you can still get affordable VIP lodging for Hillary Clinton's inauguration. <a href="https://t.co/BXyJ2LfelZ">https://t.co/BXyJ2LfelZ</a></p>&mdash; Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler) <a href="https://twitter.com/brianbeutler/status/760887716162572288">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

So Morning Joe Scarborough said this:

As Morning Joe co-host Joe Scarborough tells it, Donald Trump asked not once, not twice, but three times about nuclear weapons during a foreign policy briefing with an expert. "Trump asked three times in an hour briefing, 'Why can't we use nuclear weapons?'" Scarborough said on Wednesday's episode of Morning Joe, as a panel discussed concerns about how Trump might handle national security. At one point, Scarborough said, Trump even asked, "'If we have them, why can't we use them?'"

After the panel managed to wipe the stunned looks off their faces, Scarborough's co-host, Mika Brzezinski, fired off a warning: "Be careful America, and be careful Republican leaders," she said.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/64066...n-policy-adviser-why-cant-use-nuclear-weapons

And a former nuclear weapons officer responded with this tweet storm:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/john-noonan-trump-nuclear-weapons-twitter

 

Yes we can...