Astros interested in Quintana

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by Shark44, Dec 8, 2016.

  1. Nick

    Nick Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    35,326
    Likes Received:
    645
    Sure, he will probably be called up then.

    But could take another 6 months to a year to be a major contributor/vital component (presuming he adjusts to MLB pitching), hence the 2 year estimate.

    Likewise, don't think anybody was expecting Bregman to be counted on as an everyday player for 2016 going into last year... and he ascended at an extremely rapid/unlikely to be the norm case.

    Certainly, as you know, I'm all for rapid promotion of the "special" ones... its just way too unlikely to presume all of them adjust to MLB pitching rapidly enough after their first call-up to be counted on as a major force.
     
    #101 Nick, Dec 10, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2016
  2. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    600
    You know what else happens "all the time" - and with far greater frequency? Prospects bust.

    If we're lucky, Martes will one day be as good as Quintana - so why not eliminate the uncertainty? Because of Zack Grienke? I guess the Texans should never draft a QB in the first round again; I mean look how many bust.
     
    No Worries likes this.
  3. cardpire

    cardpire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    10,399
    Likes Received:
    385
    You named the team that may actually believe in that philosophy.
     
    Yaosthirdleg and texans1095 like this.
  4. awc713

    awc713 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    3,027
    Likes Received:
    391
    Peter Gammons (on twitter):

    When Astros askewd on Jose Quintana, Chisox asked 3 names:Francis Martes, Kyle Tucker, Joe Musgrove
     
    Zacatecas, No Worries and Rileydog like this.
  5. Rileydog

    Rileydog Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    422
    There must be a way to get them off musgrove. He is a member of the rotation this year. If we can overcome that, then it's a deal.
     
    vince and mikol13 like this.
  6. sealclubber1016

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    7,736
    Likes Received:
    626
    I sure hope they meant 2 of the 3 names.

    Martes or Musgrove, not both. Tucker I'm fine with. Have to talk them down to a different 3rd name.
     
  7. Rileydog

    Rileydog Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    422
    And finally, some actual Quintana news in the Quintana thread.
     
    Zacatecas, Bear_Bryant and awc713 like this.
  8. BimaThug

    BimaThug Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    7,709
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    No, thanks, to dealing both Martes AND Tucker.
     
    vince, IowaAstro and raining threes like this.
  9. awc713

    awc713 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    3,027
    Likes Received:
    391
    Gammons reported price makes the Martes/Cameron/Reed posts that much more delusional. Keep thinking we're landing Quintana for Martes Fisher and fillers, keep dreaming.
     
    Zacatecas likes this.
  10. sealclubber1016

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    7,736
    Likes Received:
    626
    Doubt there is any way we can make a competitive offer that doesn't involve those 2, because the drop of to any 3rd name is pretty big now that Reed had a brief MLB struggle. Fisher, Whitley, Perez, Paulino aren't gonna move the meter enough.

    Quintana is a proven, team controlled, front end pitcher, they aren't coming off that cheap. Martes and Tucker would hurt bad, but i would do it. Bird in the hand, time to win now.
     
    No Worries and mikol13 like this.
  11. mikol13

    mikol13 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,343
    Likes Received:
    585
    Exactly what I was thinking. That said, I might be willing to take out Tucker and add Musgrove.
     
  12. raining threes

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    106
    I would counter with Martes/Paulino/Cameron/Reed.

    All top 10 guys.
     
  13. awc713

    awc713 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    3,027
    Likes Received:
    391
    "Top 10" is not only relative but also irrelevant. Reed and Cameron have shown very real concerns and struggles, regardless where they rank in our system. You can certainly counter with that offer, but CWS is hanging up quickly.
     
  14. awc713

    awc713 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    3,027
    Likes Received:
    391
  15. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    18,917
    Likes Received:
    1,864
    Those offers are too lean, but if you believe the Gammons intel it shows the value of Tucker and Martes is pretty damn high.... which is why I really don't like top 100 lists, they are always outdated and in most cases are arbitrary.
     
    Zacatecas likes this.
  16. raining threes

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    106
    We shall see,

    But I would wait until the trade deadline if Martes/Tucker were involved.

    This also mitigates against injury
     
    #116 raining threes, Dec 10, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2016
  17. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    8,043
    Likes Received:
    707
    Reading between the lines on Luhnow's interview, Tucker is the untouchable one. He has the highest floor btw him and Martes, and our outfield is set up for him to take a starting position by 2018.

    I would counter with Martes Musgrove and Fisher. That's about as good a deal as I'd offer.
     
    #117 Spacemoth, Dec 10, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2016
    Zacatecas and mikol13 like this.
  18. Rileydog

    Rileydog Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    422
    Zacatecas and mikol13 like this.
  19. Wolverrines

    Wolverrines Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    86
    It has to be one of Musgrove or Martes not both and I'm sure the Astros feel the same way so that might be the hang up . Perfectly fine with trading Tucker.

    Also if it make it easier I think the stros should look into James shields. Not sure how long that contract is or the money but I just think he is better option over most at either the fourth or fifth spot. Maybe they pay some of that salary to
     
  20. BigM

    BigM Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2001
    Messages:
    11,268
    Likes Received:
    420
    I don't think you want to give up Martes and Musgrove. Are Tucker and Martes our top 2 prospects? I think those 2 alone should do it.
     

Share This Page