Are you serious... you have to be kidding me. I posted a question last night when I came back from the movies (Minority Report.. good movie) and read how everyone was bashing Steve for what he said on T.V. Since I didn't hear what the question was, I couldn't defend him or bash him like the others. It was strange, because I couldn't get a quick responce so I thought nobody knew like me. Then I read the post this mourning and nobody seemed to know, because THERE WASN'T ONE. Are we in that much need for a debate that we have to assume what was asked, and then bash a guy for his answer. First, it was Ming. There were pro-Ming and Anti-Ming. Now it seems with Ming being a done deal, that has slowed down. Now I guess next up to bat is Steve Francis. If what I'm reading is right, what you all heard was a FREAKING "sound bite". Not a discussion or a full interview, just one guy giving one quote. You all don't even know what he was asked, and ya'll are all over the guy. If he was asked about "his" game , then it is nothing wrong with answering about "his" game. If some of you post negative to Steve just for kicks... then I can understand, but for the ones who believe they have validity behind their statements based on second hand ease-dropping, I have just one wish. DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ! Like I said before "It's funny how we bash the ones we know the most, and love the ones we know the least."
x34 Yeah I do need a new thread on this, because it seems as if some people didn't get the point. Besides there are about 4 threads on how much Steve is an ***-hole. If you get it, don't respond.. it's not for you. If you don't get it, then it's something you should think about.
A simple suggestion : try not starting a thread when there are other threads similar to or within which a similar discussion is taking place. All it does is cause confusion in the forum when you have 2 or more "I hate/love Steve" threads talking about the same dang thing...
