1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

WTF- US Military "Prepped" Guantanamo Detainees for Chinese Interrogators

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by gifford1967, May 21, 2008.

  1. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    4,653
    Jesus Christ. How long will it take to wash out the stain left behind by the Bush administration.

    Report: U.S. Soldiers Did 'Dirty Work' for Chinese Interrogators
    Alleges Guantanamo Personnel Softened Up Detainees at Request of Chinese Intelligence
    By JUSTIN ROOD
    ABC News

    May 20, 2008—

    U.S. military personnel at Guantanamo Bay allegedly softened up detainees at the request of Chinese intelligence officials who had come to the island facility to interrogate the men -- or they allowed the Chinese to dole out the treatment themselves, according to claims in a new government report.

    Buried in a Department of Justice report released Tuesday are new allegations about a 2002 arrangement between the United States and China, which allowed Chinese intelligence to visit Guantanamo and interrogate Chinese Uighurs held there.

    According to the report by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine, an FBI agent reported a detainee belonging to China's ethnic Uighur minority and a Uighur translator told him Uighur detainees were kept awake for long periods, deprived of food and forced to endure cold for hours on end, just prior to questioning by Chinese interrogators.

    Susan Manning, a lawyer who represents several Uighurs still held at Guantanamo, said Tuesday the allegations are all too familiar.

    U.S. personnel "are engaging in abusive tactics on behalf of the Chinese," she said Tuesday. When Uighur detainees refused to talk to Chinese interrogators in 2002, U.S. military personnel put them in solitary confinement as punishment, she said.

    "Why are we doing China's dirty work?" Manning said. "Surely we're better than that."

    An official authorized to speak on behalf of the Defense Department but who declined to be named confirmed it was Pentagon policy to allow officials from other countries to have access to interview their nationals at Guantanamo but declined to discuss the specifics alleged in the report.

    According to Fine's report, the FBI agent said the Uighur detainee told him that the night before his interrogation by Chinese officials, "he was awakened at 15-minute intervals the entire night and into the next day." The detainee also allegedly said he was "exposed to low room temperatures for long periods of time and was deprived of at least one meal."

    "The agent stated that he understood that the treatment of the Uighur detainees was either carried out by the Chinese interrogators or was carried out by U.S. personnel at the behest of Chinese interrogators," the report by the Department of Justice inspector general stated.

    U.S. forces captured roughly three dozen Uighurs in eastern Afghanistan shortly after invading the country in October 2001. The men said they were working there to earn money for families back home and to evade the Chinese government, which is known for taking a harsh and uncompromising line with separatist Uighurs.

    The U.S. State Department has found China to have suppressed the religious freedom of Uighurs, who are Muslim, and has accused the Chinese government of persecuting, even executing, those who advocate Uighur independence.

    In 2006, after the United States released five Uighurs from Guantanamo, China asked for them to be repatriated so they could be prosecuted as terrorists. The United States declined to do so, out of concern they would not be treated humanely. Instead they transferred the men to Albania, which was the only country out of 90 approached by the U.S. government who would take them.

    The Pentagon says it is trying to release and resettle the majority of the 17 Uighurs who remain in Guantanamo, although it says it still considers them enemy combatants and a threat.

    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4894921&page=1
     
  2. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Awesome. Now we can pompously complain about China's callous stance on human rights in greater detail.
     
  3. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,120
    Likes Received:
    10,158
    So let me get this straight... we help the Chinese (I guess we "talked" to them) suppress religious freedom, stifle the rights of a minority, and kill their own people by allowing (or conducting) torture? I wonder if there was a quid pro quo here... in exchange for access to the prisoners, did the Chinese teach us a little about torture techniques? At any rate, this is shocking but not really surprising, considering this administration really wants to be and would be a totalitarian government if they could get away with it.

    Notice how, in this story, the Chinese use terms eerily similar to what the Bush Administration uses to try and scare us into giving up American ideals.

    I am so proud to be an American today... and to think they are able to do stuff like this on behalf of all of us is icing on the cake.

     
  4. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,919
    Likes Received:
    39,921
    Hold on. We are going nuts because prisoners who are being held as terror suspects are not allowed to have steady sleep, miss a SINGLE meal, and are in cold rooms? It doesn't say the rooms were freezing, just cold.

    It doesn't sound pleasant, but it doesn't sound like anything to go crazy about either. This isn't beating them, waterboarding them, shocking them, etc.

    I'm not saying I support the actions, but I just don't see it as something to cry human rights violations over either. This is simply making them uncomfortable.
     
  5. vlaurelio

    vlaurelio Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    21,310
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    "kept awake for long periods" <> not allowed to have steady sleep
    "deprived of food" <> miss a SINGLE meal
     
  6. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    4,653

    Did you miss the part about Chinese interrogators? Why are we facilitating interrogations for the Chinese? This is crazy.
     
  7. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,919
    Likes Received:
    39,921
    "he was awakened at 15-minute intervals the entire night and into the next day." The detainee also allegedly said he was "exposed to low room temperatures for long periods of time and was deprived of at least one meal."
     
  8. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,919
    Likes Received:
    39,921
    I don't know. I'm not in the CIA or the State Department so I can't say what sort of national interests were served by cooperating with the Chinese in this matter.
     
  9. vlaurelio

    vlaurelio Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    21,310
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    at least one meal > one meal

    he won't be talking right now if he was frozen..
     
  10. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,919
    Likes Received:
    39,921
    He can only remember one meal he missed.

    Typical of a person who wants to exaggerate their plot. "I missed at least one meal" which implies you missed more but you aren't actually SAYING you missed more so you can't be called a liar.

    Again, I'm not saying what was done here was good, but it doesn't seem overly dastardly either.
     
  11. deepblue

    deepblue Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,648
    Likes Received:
    5
    Maybe because we might want to interrogate their prisoners? I seem to remember a lot of different countries would let us gain access to their terror suspects.

    Interrogation techniques aside, we need more cooperation with other countries, not less.
     
  12. yuantian

    yuantian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,849
    Likes Received:
    8
    are these people caught fighting against the US? if they are terrorist, is not fighting China for independence, then they are pretty much same as other folks there. not saying it's right to "torture" them. but it ain't like they got more treatment either.
     
  13. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    Working in Afghanistan to earn money? Yeah right, what a lovely destination.

    Cooperation between member states of Interpol to combat terrorism is crazy? Or are you simply having problem with Chinese/China?

    FYI, Uighur separatist group is a terrorist organization designated by the governments of China, Kazakhstan, Pakistan and the United States, as well as the United Nations.
     
  14. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    I agree. Just two months ago, an attempt by three Uighur terrorists -- the ringleader is a 19-year old female who was trained outside China -- to blow up an airplane in a domestic flight in northwest China using illegally smuggled gasoline contained in soft drink can was foiled by vigilant flight attendants on board.
     
    #14 wnes, May 21, 2008
    Last edited: May 21, 2008
  15. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    With all these allegories comparing Iraq to WW2, I wonder if Bush has gone off his rocker to court his own Stalinist Russia.
     
  16. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    4,653

    I have a problem when the United States "softens up" detainees held under our authority for interrogation by agents of a non-democratic, repressive government. I don't care if the government is China, Saudi Arabia, Lybia, Uzbekistan, etc.

    I'm just picky like that.
     
  17. yuantian

    yuantian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,849
    Likes Received:
    8
    you mean, "none western countries"? i don't like cultural imperialism. in fact, if saudi arabia, lybia, uzbekistan want to keep their own cultural identity, good for them. if THEY want change, they will change on their OWN schedule. just because they are different, doesn't mean they are bad.
     
  18. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    As long as cultural imperialism is within borders, it is fine?
     
  19. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,919
    Likes Received:
    39,921
    This is much ado about very little. They didn't beat him, didn't shove his head in water, didn't subject him to days of no food, women touching his pee-pee, nude photos, etc. This was basically one day of discomfort.

    Police do things like on a more limited scale all the time. Keep people in interrogation rooms for hours and hours, late at night, etc.
     
  20. yuantian

    yuantian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,849
    Likes Received:
    8
    if it's within borders, why would it be cultural imperialism? it's only the case, if you are forcing your own belief system onto another group of people who doesn't share the same culture.
     

Share This Page