1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Wrongfully convicted man denied pardon (by a Dem governor)

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by wnes, Aug 18, 2005.

  1. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    Wrongfully convicted man denied pardon (by a southern Dem governor)

    Shame on you, Easley. :mad:

    [​IMG]

    What's wrong with the Carolinians? They keep electing dumbass's to highest positions in the states. From Strom Senile Thurman the segregationist/rapist/pedophile, to Jessie Helm the "Mr. Clinton better watch out if he comes down here and better have a bodyguard", to this "Sorry dude I can't pardon you for my blunder" Mike Easley. What southern charm and hospitality is this all about?

    Wrongfully convicted man denied pardon

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/08/18/refused.pardon.ap/index.html

    Governor withholds pardon for man he convicted

    Thursday, August 18, 2005; Posted: 12:49 p.m. EDT (16:49 GMT)

    RALEIGH, North Carolina (AP) -- Gov. Mike Easley has refused to pardon a man he sent to prison when he was a prosecutor even though the man was freed after the victims recanted their testimony.

    [​IMG]
    Easley denied the petition of Sylvester Smith, 54, who was convicted in 1984 for first degree rape and two counts of first degree sexual offense, the governor's office said Wednesday.

    At the same time, however, the governor pardoned Leo Waters, 56, of New Bern, who served 21 years in prison for a 1981 rape and was freed based on new DNA evidence.
    [​IMG]

    A pardon in North Carolina allows a wrongfully convicted person to seek $20,000 a year from the state for each year the person was imprisoned, up to $500,000.

    Smith said Easley had a conflict of interest because he prosecuted the case when he was district attorney in Brunswick County. "I don't think he's man enough to say he made a mistake," Smith said.

    A judge ordered Smith released from prison in November. The accusers, who were 5 and 6 at the time of the trial, recanted their earlier testimony and said their grandmother told them to say Smith was responsible for the abuse rather than their 9-year-old cousin. The cousin, who can't be prosecuted because of his age at the time of the crime, is serving a life prison sentence for murder. The grandmother has died.

    Smith won a new trial and a prosecutor dismissed the charges.

    The governor issued a statement saying his decision was based on a review of the 1984 trial transcript and a recently completed inquiry by the State Bureau of Investigation.

    There is no appeal of Easley's decision. Smith's attorney, Roy Trest, said he would file a new petition with the next governor in 2009.

    In the other case, Waters was cleared of his rape conviction after a DNA test conducted in 2003. District Attorney Dewey Hudson dismissed charges against Waters more than year ago and a grand jury indicted a Massachusetts prison inmate in the case Tuesday.

    Waters had been convicted in a March 31, 1981, attack on a Jacksonville woman.

    DNA taken from the victim and the crime scene was compared to samples in a national registry and matched that of Joel Bill Caulk, 58, serving time in Massachusetts for rape and robbery, Jacksonville Police Detective Len Condry said.
     
    #1 wnes, Aug 18, 2005
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2005
  2. surrender

    surrender Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,340
    Likes Received:
    32
    That's absolutely disgusting :mad: Shouldn't there be some sort of pardoning "chain of command" in cases where there's a conflict of interest?
     
  3. vwiggin

    vwiggin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,951
    Likes Received:
    2
    Why shouldn't everyone who gets wrongfully convicted get this kind of money?

    Why is it necessary to add in the subjective pardon? Aren't all wrongful convictions bad and therefore deserving of compensation?
     
  4. UTKaluman597

    UTKaluman597 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    910
    Likes Received:
    126
    Just another indication of just how far we have to go.. :( .
     
  5. vwz

    vwz Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    My understanding is that in most states, due to qualified sovereign immunity, wrongfully convicted individuals may only obtain compensation from the state if the state's behavior is reckless or intentional, rather than an error in judgment - as catastrophic as that error may be...
     
  6. MartianMan

    MartianMan Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    1,745
    Likes Received:
    3
    Aren't people decided guilty or innocent by a jury of their peers? So it's not the state's fault if you are convicted.
     
  7. vwiggin

    vwiggin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,951
    Likes Received:
    2
    Thanks vwz, that's a good point.

    MartianMan, I guess I believe a person who is wrongfully convicted should be compensated somehow. Just telling them "tough cookies" and sending them on their way doesn't sound fair.

    We can't make the jurors pay the money. That only leaves the government, which, incidentally, was responsible for preparing the prosecution's case.

    No fault compensation systems are not unheard of in our legal system (see Worker's Comp). :)
     
  8. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,807
    Likes Received:
    20,465
    The fact that the man was denied compensation makes me angry. The fact that another case there was a man who was compensated makes it absolutely vile that the first person wasn't compensated.

    It is disgusting. What a rotten rotten person the govenor must be. I hope his insides rot.
     

Share This Page