1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Would you guys take Woods or Marcus?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by jevjnd, Apr 30, 2002.

  1. jevjnd

    jevjnd Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,496
    Likes Received:
    258
    I am not sure where Marcus will go in the draft. But I will propose two scenarios for you guys. tell me what you think. would you trade our pick for a slightly lower pick and fodder and take Chris Marcus. Or would you go after Qyntel Woods. As for me I would take Woods but his knee does worry me.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,298
    Likes Received:
    14,743
    I know Woods had a knee injury a year or so ago and had surgery.Do you know if he has had a new or recurrent injury?
    Woods has been scoring around 32 points a game this year,if he is all right I would take him instead of Marcus.
     
  3. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    Woods.

    Wouldn't mind Marcus if he somehow slipped to the 15 pick, but if Marcus is the main guy we get out of the draft I would be

    EXTREMELY dissapointed.
     
  4. jevjnd

    jevjnd Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,496
    Likes Received:
    258
    Good point it's not recurring, and I would be dissapointed if that's all that we got as well, but I am sure that we could get two draft picks for a pick this high or trade Woods for Marcus and another player.

    [​IMG]
     
  5. RNuss02

    RNuss02 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2002
    Messages:
    394
    Likes Received:
    3
    marcus would greatly dissappoint me at #5! We need an impact player this high, and Woods would fit that bill. He has the potential to be a star. Marcus does not have the athleticism, or overall game to warrant a high selection. He's just another big body. I say go after woods, and pick up Marc Jackson, the center, from Minny this off season.
     
  6. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    The Rockets can not get pick #4 so...

    I would take Woods with #5 or lower but not at #3 (Ming, Williams or Wagner will be available at #3). I would auction off #3 to the highest bidder (trade down + a short contract vet).

    Unless his workout is exceptional, no higher than #10 for Marcus (or 8 for Borchardt, 12 for Ely/Stoudamire).


    Personally, I prefer Jerome James over Jackson. He's bigger, better and costs less (James is a FA - no trade needed).
     
    #6 GATER, May 1, 2002
    Last edited: May 1, 2002
  7. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    The Rockets don't have <b>impact</b> rookies because they don't get a chance to play. :mad:
     
  8. Live

    Live Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2000
    Messages:
    2,025
    Likes Received:
    0
    Woods.

    Marcus might be worth consideration at #15, but I'll cry if he's taken with the #5. There would be no excuse.
     
  9. jevjnd

    jevjnd Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,496
    Likes Received:
    258
    You are absolutely right about that


    [​IMG]

    Please give me more playing time, Rudy :confused:
     

Share This Page