1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Would the Spurs last shot counted???

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by ebu, Mar 22, 2009.

Tags:
  1. ebu

    ebu Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2002
    Messages:
    802
    Likes Received:
    14
    I think it was Bonner that shot it, but if it went in would it have counted???
    I mean there is no way he can set and shoot in 0.3 but it sounded like the buzzer went off after he got the shot in the air so would it have counted??

    I was just curious
     
  2. bamtonio

    bamtonio Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    740
    Likes Received:
    6
    i think it would've, but the clock started half a second late
     
  3. bob718

    bob718 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,135
    Likes Received:
    36
    Definitely.
     
  4. Blake

    Blake Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,970
    Likes Received:
    3,005
    the old Utah Jazz late clock start trick
     
  5. Mr Chuck Norris

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,526
    Likes Received:
    1,745
    YES, IF bRANDON rOY CAN SHOOT A 30 FOOT TURNAROUND OF COURSE IT WOULDA Counted.
     
  6. Tonaaayyyy

    Tonaaayyyy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2002
    Messages:
    4,537
    Likes Received:
    149
  7. Cbox

    Cbox Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    1
    Drexler said it would not of counted after Bonner shot it because the clock went off before he shot.
     
  8. l3igballer23

    l3igballer23 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2001
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    4
    it looked like Battier was asking the ref if it would have counted anyway and the ref said no.
     
  9. The Hungarian Rocket

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    2
    No. It isn't allowed to catch and shoot with 0.3 left on the clock.
     
  10. Lonestar28

    Lonestar28 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    477
    Likes Received:
    5
    Nice try SA time keeper. Bonner's brick would not have counted.
     
  11. plee

    plee Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    155
    With 0.3 on the clock, only a tip in will count. The NBA determined that you cannot take a normal shot in 0.3.
     
  12. Pizza_Da_Hut

    Pizza_Da_Hut I put on pants for this?

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    11,323
    Likes Received:
    4,119
    It would have, but realistically the clock was started late. The officials would have to count it because all they can rely on is the red on the backboard, but the Rockets could argue the call i think (the same way the Heat got screwed with the Shaq foulout). Of course this is pure speculation. I'm probably wrong....
     
  13. Laoyi

    Laoyi Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,365
    Likes Received:
    0
    Definitely not. 0.3 s is not for catch and shoot! But only for shoot!
     
  14. henGoOink

    henGoOink Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    7
  15. The_Yoyo

    The_Yoyo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2001
    Messages:
    16,683
    Likes Received:
    2,873
    the league has an unwritten rule in place that you cannot catch and shoot legally under .4 seconds on the clock...the infamous derek fisher rule.

    there was .3 so even if the spurs clock guy didnt start the clock till it hit the rim the refs would overrule the shot going in.
     
  16. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,816
    Likes Received:
    17,204
    Exactly.

    Here is a proposal: If its 1.0 seconds or less, where you know that even 1 tenth of a second makes a difference, take the game clock out of the clock operator's hand.

    Entire outcomes of games have the potential to be decided by some no-name clock operator. Just take it out of their hands. Let the refs control it, or even better, always retro-actively review the last play with a neutral clock (that actually starts when it should), and thus you take the clock operator delay factor out of consideration.
     
  17. MLittle577

    MLittle577 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,754
    Likes Received:
    192
    Catch and shoot is the rule? Is it regardless off the clock D ok g as it's over .3 seconds?
     
  18. archinkent

    archinkent Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,832
    Likes Received:
    41
    u cant shoot under 0.4 seconds iirc, only a tip. but man that clock started LATE
     
  19. rocketman1979

    rocketman1979 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    14
    The Spurs probably knew that yet they and the timekeeper decided to try to cheat their way to a victory.
     
  20. YallMean

    YallMean Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Messages:
    14,284
    Likes Received:
    3,815
    No. 0.3 sec is not enough for a catch and shoot, let along a catch, aim and shoot in slow motion that Boner did. Had it gone in, the Refs would have had to review it and pretty sure the rule is 0.4 second is the line for a catch and shoot.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now