I think it was Bonner that shot it, but if it went in would it have counted??? I mean there is no way he can set and shoot in 0.3 but it sounded like the buzzer went off after he got the shot in the air so would it have counted?? I was just curious
With 0.3 on the clock, only a tip in will count. The NBA determined that you cannot take a normal shot in 0.3.
It would have, but realistically the clock was started late. The officials would have to count it because all they can rely on is the red on the backboard, but the Rockets could argue the call i think (the same way the Heat got screwed with the Shaq foulout). Of course this is pure speculation. I'm probably wrong....
the league has an unwritten rule in place that you cannot catch and shoot legally under .4 seconds on the clock...the infamous derek fisher rule. there was .3 so even if the spurs clock guy didnt start the clock till it hit the rim the refs would overrule the shot going in.
Exactly. Here is a proposal: If its 1.0 seconds or less, where you know that even 1 tenth of a second makes a difference, take the game clock out of the clock operator's hand. Entire outcomes of games have the potential to be decided by some no-name clock operator. Just take it out of their hands. Let the refs control it, or even better, always retro-actively review the last play with a neutral clock (that actually starts when it should), and thus you take the clock operator delay factor out of consideration.
The Spurs probably knew that yet they and the timekeeper decided to try to cheat their way to a victory.
No. 0.3 sec is not enough for a catch and shoot, let along a catch, aim and shoot in slow motion that Boner did. Had it gone in, the Refs would have had to review it and pretty sure the rule is 0.4 second is the line for a catch and shoot.