1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

why doesnt boston trade...

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by htownbball, Jun 26, 2007.

  1. htownbball

    htownbball Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,608
    Likes Received:
    629
    With Portland?

    Boston gets Randolph and Jarrett Jack

    Portland gets 5th pick and Theo Ratliff and filler

    Boston gets a true pointguard and a bigman who can score/rebound to pair up with Al Jefferson, and it should make Pierce happy. They should immediately become contenders.

    Jefferson
    Randolph
    Pierce
    Green/West
    Jack

    Portland gets the #5 pick and a chance at Mike Conley if Memphis passes on him. Also opens a spot so Aldridge and Oden can play side by side. Also gives them some capspace with Ratliff's expiring contract

    This deal makes alot of sense for both teams, but would be contingent on Conley being there at 5. If he isn't, they could probably work out a deal where Jarrett Jack isn't included.
     
  2. TriCkz

    TriCkz Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,488
    Likes Received:
    30
    Honestly it's a bad trade for both teams in my opinion.

    Boston doesn't get younger but it puts them in a position to make a final championship run.
     
  3. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    because randolph is a loser with a max contract.
     
  4. TriCkz

    TriCkz Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,488
    Likes Received:
    30
    He would dominate the post in the East.
     
  5. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    He's decently dominant in the West, too. Hasn't helped the Blazers make the playoffs, though. The Celtics would make the playoffs in the East with him, but I doubt they get very deep.

    Seems like a fair deal for Portland.
     
  6. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,746
    Likes Received:
    12,269
    Last season Boston traded away their top pick to Portland. Boston got Sebastian Telfair; Portland got Brandon Roy (plus Raef LaFrentz's contract). Why would Boston do that again? Danny Ainge rightfully took a lot of grief for that boneheaded move.
     
  7. htownbball

    htownbball Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,608
    Likes Received:
    629
    Because its a better deal than trading Al Jefferson, who is a dominating force by himself in the East, along with their 5th pick for JUST Jermaine O'Neal.

    Paul Pierce wants to win now...and this would be the best deal for them at this particular moment.

    Portland was a mess last year, you really cant fault Randolph for all of their suckiness.

    Remember, they get Randolph (a proven 20/10 player) and Jarrett Jack, a young guy who has shown he can run an offense. He's better than any point guard they currently have.

    Someone said they'd be getting older...well Randolph is 26 and Jack is like 23.

    Who at #5 would provide 20/10 right away for Boston? Nobody. A big three of Pierce, Jefferson, and Randolph would be tough to mess with in the East.

    C Jefferson
    PF Randolph
    SF Pierce
    SG Green
    PG Jack

    G West
    C Perkins
    SF Wally
    PG Rondo
    F Gomes
     
  8. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,746
    Likes Received:
    12,269
    The Celtics will be a basket case until they dump Danny Ainge, who is clearly in over his head. I don't see Jefferson and Randolph in the same lineup. In fact, Randolph is the type of player who subtracts from how effective his teammates are. Both Pierce and Jefferson would be diminished by adding him to their team and the Blazers would be better off for dumping Randolph. Portland wins that trade by a mile and even Ainge is smart enough to realize it. Giving Portland the #5 pick after they already have the #1 pick, PLUS allowing them to dump Randolph's contract reminds me of something Ted Stepien would have done in the 70s.

    I agree with your comment about Jefferson + #5 for JO. I'm down on JO and if offered that the Pacers should jump on it if the salaries could match up somehow. But just because one trade isn't as crazy as another doesn't mean you should do it. Just my opinion.
     
  9. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,849
    Likes Received:
    3,197
    Reasonable question, reasonable trade idea. Ainge, however, has a body of clueless work making the C's directionless and irrelevant.

    Nice job, brat! :D
     
  10. htownbball

    htownbball Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,608
    Likes Received:
    629
    youre probably right. on paper though, it makes for a good trade that makes sense.
     

Share This Page