1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Who would you prefer to add to our team? Paul or Rubio

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by jopatmc, Jul 26, 2010.

?

Which player would you prefer to trade for, Paul or Rubio?

  1. Chris Paul

    269 vote(s)
    66.6%
  2. Ricky Rubio

    135 vote(s)
    33.4%
  1. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390
    Very simple poll. Rubio cannot be added this season. He could possibly be added after this next season if he can agree to a contract and wants to come to the NBA. So, essentially, if you had a choice between trading for Chris Paul and another big contract like Okafor, in an all-in type move, giving up our young talent and the two Knicks picks, would you rather make that trade or wait one season and trade for Rubio's rights using the two Knicks picks plus possibly another young talent like Budinger or Hill to get the trade done?

    There's about a 6 year age gap. And Rubio is obvioiusly unproven at the NBA level. Of course, Paul is a superstar, but he could possibly be gone after two seasons or maybe even sooner since there is probably going to be a lockout next season.

    So, in light of all the unknowns, including Paul's attitude and willingness to sign an extension, if both players could actually be attained through trade, with Paul costing you all your young talent, expirings, both Knicks picks, and bringing back a big contract in Okafor, and Rubio essentially costing you the two Knicks picks plus some other young pieces, which player would you prefer to trade for?

    Me? I'm a gambler. I'd rather get Rubio if he can be gotten. I'd rather do a stop gap trade this season, giving up whatever we have to give up to get Rubio's rights, moving Brooks if we have to for Sessions as a stop gap, to get Rubio.
     
  2. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    i'd have to guess to tell you what we'd get out of rubio.

    i already know what you'd get out of paul.

    i vote paul.
     
  3. YouCompleteMe

    YouCompleteMe Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2010
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    1
    I say Rubio because he is much younger. He has at least 10 years before his decline, whereas Paul only has about 5 years left before his decline.
     
  4. Prince

    Prince Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2009
    Messages:
    5,375
    Likes Received:
    161
    Rubio it is..
     
  5. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,280
    That makes sense. Nobody knows how exactly Rubio's game will translate to the NBA.
     
  6. RedNation

    RedNation Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    19,741
    Likes Received:
    709
    You know how he's going to play after the injury last season?
     
  7. ASidd_1990

    ASidd_1990 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,732
    Likes Received:
    87
    I voted for Chris Paul.

    But if I really wanted to trade for an elite point guard to this team, I would ask about Steve Nash. I think Phoenix is ready to hand the keys to the team to Dragic.
     
  8. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390

    Why sure. But Nash only has a couple years left. I agree with you, I think he is going to be available, especially this season, if PHX slips into mediocrity, which I suspect they will. I don't think I'd give up the farm for him for this reason. However, if the price were less, say a future first rounder and maybe another talent exchange, then I'd be all for it. And........I can see Morey using Nash as leverage to get Minny or N.O. to move off their dumb you-know-whats if all those teams are struggling come the trade deadline.
     
  9. H-TOWNSFINEST

    H-TOWNSFINEST Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    714
    Likes Received:
    106
    In the long run I think Rubio would be a better addition. If we want to win now, I think CP3 is the way to go. He's proven. Rubio's got game but needs a year or 2 before starting in the NBA imo. Tough decision to make. :confused: Guess that's why I'm a fan and not a GM..
     
  10. kidcave9

    kidcave9 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    3,062
    Likes Received:
    184
    you could get rubio for a fraction of the assests the Hornets would want for paul(trade rape david kahn) ;) ......so rubio
     
  11. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    I'm not entirely sure you're a gambler instead of just a crazy Rubio fan. You've been abnormally pro Rubio on this board for a while I believe.

    That's fine, and your of course entitled to such an opinion. If you turn out to be right, you can say you were right....I just have a feeling that if you replaced Chris Paul with Kobe Bryant or Dwayne Wade...or heck, pretty much anyone except maybe Lebron, Dwight and Durant, you'd make a similar argument.

    "Well, Kobe is old, and he's got that funky finger. Wade, he's been injured a lot and isn't really what this team needs."

    I could be wrong...and you do bring up valid criticisms of Paul - his potential desire to play in Houston (though let's be honest, nobody knows what he wants, other than he wants to win), his shorter contract, his recent injury history.

    But still, we're talking about Chris Paul. The guy has been the best PG in the game (asterik, when healthy), for the last few years. He's an MVP candidate, and came in second only a few years ago. He's amazing, offensively AND defensively. Rubio young? No. But he just turned 25...not exactly old. And what we'd have to give up? In neither case will it be crippling, even if "forced" to take on Okafor's contract (forced as in...overpaid, yes, but 10+ points, 10+ rebounds, 1.5+ blocks in today's NBA means you get paid $10 million+ a year...and with our fragile center, it's a perfect insurance policy).

    The injury concern is the only real one mentioned. But even still, Paul came back last year and has at least taken the step of proving he can get back on the court and play at a high level (as opposed to a Yao, for example, where our fingers are crossed).

    You just really have a fascination with Rubio

    no...it's less about what you have to give up...as in both cases, any actual "assets" given up will be the young players we've started assembling (Hill, Patterson, Budinger)...and more about what you have to take back. Meaning you'd have to take on a lot of salary in return in the form of an additional big contract with Paul, such as Okafor, or Posey.
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. Francis 4 ever

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    755
    Likes Received:
    19
    I think the yao era is done after this season and its rebuilding time. cp3's two year rental at a huge price (both contract and asset wise) isn't worth it.
     
  13. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    This is an okay stance in regards to Paul...but shouldn't lead one to say, let's do everything we can to trade for Rubio. We could put just as much stock in hoping that Morey can use his many assets to luck into or move into the upper lottery of next year's draft and then draft the next Kevin Durant...

    i.e. - both routes we know as much about.
     
  14. ASidd_1990

    ASidd_1990 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,732
    Likes Received:
    87
    Brooks + Battier + Hill + future first round pick for Nash

    Sweetner : 3 million dollar cash considerations.

    Throw in Grant Hill for Jeffries and maybe Budinger.
     
  15. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    Rubio. He's taller, younger, no knee injury, and would probably re-sign with Houston. I think LeChoke has gotten into Paul's head and convinced him to form his own vanity team.
     
  16. GoRoc

    GoRoc Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    1
    i just can't see the team with paul and i don't think he
    will want to come play with yao.
    i prefer to sit back and wait for the right deal
    to upgrade the SF positon with Iggy\Granger for minimum talent.
     
  17. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    Harsh, but true, and I think Yao knows it. His recent interview seems to reflect his coming to terms with his inevitable early retirement. This is why the Rockets went over the cap, to give Yao one last chance to go deep in the playoffs.
     
  18. DontTradeOswalt

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    37
    Hmmm Hornets have a new GM and the Timberwolves has a dumb GM, am pretty sure Morey could rape either of them....but if I wanted a PG and I wanted to win now it would be Nash, he and Amare almost beat the Lakers, imagine what he could do with more help, never seen a guy that can run an offense like him
     
  19. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,303
    Likes Received:
    3,310
  20. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,736
    Likes Received:
    41,157
    Are you serious? Chris Paul is 25 years old. Point guards tend to stay around forever and are able to play well into their 30's. Nash? Billups? Hell even Jason Kidd is still an effective palyer and he's edging close to 40.
     

Share This Page