They both have a great court vision. Teodosic is a much better shooter. Rubio is a better defender. What do you guys think about this?
Haven't you guys heard that Ricky Rubio is "special" and "just wins" despite his sorry performance? After joining the NBA, he will "immediately be a top 5 PG" and when his career is over, he will be ranked with Oscar Robertson and Larry Bird. But first, you must do drugs and drink delusional Kool-Aid to understand this. No thanks.
mm-hmm. Something tells me that Oscar Robertson and Larry Bird would have probably found away to average more than 4.4 PPG on 27% shooting over the course of 9 games against vastly inferior competition.
Teodosic's face is like the cro magnon Rubio, but that still doesn't help me choose which one is the better PG.
No doubt Teodosic...it's not even close Teodosic is like a European version of Steve Nash. This dude really is good, Euroleague MVP and Finals MVP.
Teodosic is an over rated Euroleague MVP that had a soilid performance at the FIBA world championships...so basically the question is Who is less overrated? Right now, on these forums, Rubio.