1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Who is more valuable to this team: Artest or T-Mac?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Tmacfan0115, Dec 17, 2008.

Tags:
?

More Valuable?

  1. Ron Artest

    34.3%
  2. Tracy McGrady

    65.7%
  1. Tmacfan0115

    Tmacfan0115 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think this is a valid question to ask, I believe that if one of them is missing this team is no longer a contending team.

    So Who do you guys think is more valuable?
     
  2. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    63,510
    Likes Received:
    59,002
    I don't know. Who do you think?
     
  3. kkkpopov

    kkkpopov Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    0
    hard to choose ,but i think i like ron's style
     
  4. J.Will.Xu

    J.Will.Xu Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,715
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ron's toughness,aggressiveness on the floor get my vote,but I intend to vote 'Both of 'em'.

    We couldn't move forward to anywhere without both of 'em. ;) It's been said that Ron's the missing piece to this Rockets team,so I guess they're of equivalence of value to this team.
     
  5. TheGreat

    TheGreat Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,747
    Likes Received:
    423
    We saw last year McGrady carried us in the playoffs without Yao and Artest. I doubt Artest would be able to do that because McGrady is a very good all around player. McGrady makes everyone better as well. I believe Yao is averaging 28 ppg since tmac came back.
     
  6. Tmacfan0115

    Tmacfan0115 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    0
    When you are the only star on the team left, You are suppose to carry them to the playoffs.

    I think Yao is more valuable then both of them, but too be honest I think Artest is more valuable for the simple fact that he is great on both ends of the floor.

    He is capable of scoring 20 and stopping the opponents best offensive player to less than 20. Artest's toughness and hustle is also way better than T-Mac, however I've noticed and liked T-Mac's recent hustle. However, we know Artest is going to hustle and play great D every night, we don't know if T-Mac will do that every night in a consistent basis.

    I also think that When T-Mac was out this year but when Artest was playing the team was fine. I think T-Mac just makes the team better and same for Artest.
     
  7. waihh

    waihh Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Messages:
    429
    Likes Received:
    41
    TMac and Ron are not at the same level, period. Ron plays all out day in and day out to get his numbers, there is no room for him to impact the game more. On the other hand, Tmac get similar numbers quite easily. If he is motivated, he beats team all by himself. If TMac has a great game, usually the team win.

    Ron's impact on teammates is much limited, though he plays both ends.

    According to you, Ron starts and TMac off the bench. Crazy.
     
  8. Tmacfan0115

    Tmacfan0115 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh...? So are you saying over the last 2-3 years, Michael Finley is the better player than Manu Ginobili? You do realize Manu has been coming off the bench for the Spurs too right?

    Artest would be a starter on this thread if his offensive game wasn't exactly the same as Tracy McGrady.
     
  9. ibm

    ibm Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    8,600
    Likes Received:
    60
    mcgrady by a mile (when both are healthy).
     
  10. jackie_moon23

    jackie_moon23 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2008
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    1
    Anybody who didn't vote for McGrady is kidding themselves. Tmac carried this team to the playoffs last season in a sick western conference. Ron's awesome, but he's much more supplemental than Tracy. Cue in the first round accusations, but last I checked Ron hasn't got out since the year he was on a very talented Indiana roster. McGrady has never had a 'very' talented team. Yes he's partially to blame, but nonetheless, he's leaps and bounds better than Ron. They aren't even in the same conversation.
     
  11. t_mac1

    t_mac1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    26,614
    Likes Received:
    211
    no biasness, ron is a LUXURY, not a necessity. we've made the playoffs and had great reg. season without ron before so it's not like we really need him.

    if yao was healthy last yr, the ron trade might never have happened.

    without tracy, the record speaks for itself.

    but obviously we need ron to do well off the bench. he needs to be that consistent 3rd guy when teams double tracy and yao. he got A TON of open shots last night due to yao and tracy.
     
  12. Tmacfan0115

    Tmacfan0115 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    0
    The conversation is who is more valuable not who is better.

    It's quite clear that Tracy McGrady is the better player, but in terms of value I believe It's Artest since he is a two-way player. Also his offensive game is just the same as Tracy's. Just not in the same level.
     
  13. ShadyMcGrady

    ShadyMcGrady Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    1
    The problem is, if you take T-Mac off this team, in the long run we'll probably suck. *Maybe* (doubt it, though) we'll squeak into the playoffs, but it'll be as an 8th or 7th seed and we'll get run over, probably swept, in the playoffs.

    If you take Artest off this team, we'd probably get to 5th seed and take it to 7 games (just looking at playoff history here, we've proven we can).

    Now if you keep Artest, well that has yet to be seen. :D
     
  14. t_mac1

    t_mac1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    26,614
    Likes Received:
    211
    defense was great before artest got here. and we've done well before artest got here. so it's not like if we take artest out right now, we can't get a top 4 seed.

    if you take tracy out right now, the best we can do is probably an 8th seed.

    artest's offensive game is very different.
    1) his playmaking is non-existent. he should be a finisher rather than initiates plays. we've seen how badly he plays when he tries to be a playmaker
    2) he cannot consistently create his own shot

    as you saw, tracy can make the game easier for ron (yesterday all ron had to do is get ready to shoot/score. he had his best shooting game this season %-wise, which coincides with tracy's season-high in assists).

    the most important thing you overlook is tracy makes the game easier for EVERYBODY (as carmelo said last night-> he makes others more confident). you can't say the same for artest.

    if we get a mike miller, i think we'd be even better. the point is these guys are "luxuries." they are that "extra piece," not the cornerstone.
     
  15. Tmacfan0115

    Tmacfan0115 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    0
    The team was fine with Artest and Battier in the starting lineup, and Aaron Brooks was doing whatever he wanted to do when the bench started to play.

    T-Mac and Artest seemed to just be assets now a days, Neither are true all-stars anymore.
     
  16. t_mac1

    t_mac1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    26,614
    Likes Received:
    211
    you're calling a guy that makes the game easier for everybody an "asset."
     
  17. Tmacfan0115

    Tmacfan0115 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rafer Alston makes the game easier for everybody else too. I think he is an asset. I think T-Mac is useful because he draws a lot of attention against opponents unlike Alston, which is why he attempts to score now.
     
  18. ShadyMcGrady

    ShadyMcGrady Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's a small sample size against weak opponents (except the Spurs). I'm just saying i'd much rather have McGrady-only and co. than Artest-only and co.

    Again, i'm just glad we have them both.
     
  19. t_mac1

    t_mac1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    26,614
    Likes Received:
    211
    let's make a call to morey.
     
  20. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    16,238
    Likes Received:
    2,020
    The team was just fine the past few YEARS without Artest.

    So basically McGrady is like Rafer Alston to the team, a useful asset who just kinda goes in and makes the pieces fit, keeps the ship steady, comes up big when he's needed. Kinda like just a tad more than what Brent Barry lends.
     

Share This Page