1.Novak 2.Head 3.Hayes 4.Alston 5.Other I'm disappointed with Luthur Head, I just don't want to see him next year.
Head has regressed badly, he brought more in his rookie year than he did for the majority of last year, and he did it in a offense that i really hoped he'd flourish in. if he cant get off his 3's, then he can't help us. Hayes and Head need to be upgraded.
Hayes... novak stevie francis head just about anyone who didn't show up during the playoffs..... i don't like alston much but he isn't on the top priority of people i just have to see traded.
None, really. I'm not interested in trading any players just to trade them. Novak and Woods have done the least for the team, and are least likely to be valuable in the future.
None of these guys are a "get rid of them now!" type of problem like Mike James, so I would also say no one. I also would care less if we traded any of them for so much as a second rounder, with the exception of Alston. As much as everyone piles on him, you just can't get rid of even a mediocore guy at this position without a solid replacement. PGs are scarce, and this team would be miserable with Bobby Jackson and Aaron Brooks handling the 1 position on their own. Evan
This shows me how many people actually are more interested in how they feel about a player than how they do/don't help the team. If you can get better value you trade anyone on the roster, that's how the smart GM's do it. If that means trading Rafer Alston, Tracy Mcgrady, or even Yao Ming you do it. However, you don't trade a player just because you want them gone. If Rafer Alston is you're best option you keep him until others come along. Its really that simple, unless you're stockpiled at a particular position.
Other, as in None. Who in their right mine would pay any cost to be rid of a player? Besides that, we have some guys are not very good (cough Novak cough), but no one cancerous.
?? Are you being serial with me here? Manbearpig wants that trade, do you want to appease manbearpig?
Why do people always resort to calling something they disagree with "hating"? Isn't it rather just fans of the team saying they see the flaws of the team? Of course, pointing those flaws out to the political correct world is called hating. DD - certified hater...or fan.....you be the judge.
"who do u want to trade with any cost?" isn't hating? He wasn't asking, "Who do you think can bring us more value in trade than they can on the roster?" Or even, "Who do you think creates liabilities on the court we need to minimize?" He's saying there are players who are so bad, we should get rid of them even if we get negative value (maybe even infinite negative value) in return for them. I can appreciate the point that you may not hate a player just because you want to trade him. But, I don't think this is the thread to make that point in.
