Two brehs work together. Talk about beer and personal stuff. Breh 1 trusts breh2. They feel comfortable but breh1 one takes excessive long breaks, even goes out of the job for two hours about twice a month. Breh2 gives small remarks like your luck will run out. Breh1 keeps taking breaks, he feels that he is being equal and gives breh2 the same amount of X break time. Breh2 is new because he got kicked out for smoking too many damn times in front of many people so now they put him with breh1 and breh2 is still smoking. Breh1 gets annoyed by breh 2 as well but being bros he doesn't complain. till one day the boss wants to speak with breh1 about his breaks, that the whole dept. knows about it. Breh 2 was asking along for his head. What is your take?
I looked back at it and your right. Spelling and punctuation are on point but I should added some names. Breh1 =tmac Breh2= battier.
breh2 shouldn't be smoking ganja on the job. it is generally frowned down upon in the corporate world.
Both BREHs are wrong. Both BREHs should not be doing these incorrect things. BOSS1 should separate the BREHs.
Not the easiest story to read with breh1 and breh2 as the names. If I follow it correctly breh1: takes extra long breaks regularly and sometimes disappears from work for 2 hours several times a month. Breh1 thinks this is ok because he tells breh2 he can do the same thing. breh2: Warns breh1 that his luck is going to run out if he keeps taking long breaks, and doesn't take advantage of the extra long breaks that breh1 offers him. Smokes when he isn't supposed to. Boss finds out about long breaks and calls Breh1 in to his office. I don't know what "Breh 2 was asking along for his head." means. If I was stuck working with someone who regularly took 2 hour breaks away from the job that would be a problem, especially if I was expected to cover for him while he was gone and lie for him about where he is. The fact that he "let" me do the same thing would only be a factor if I was actually doing it too. If I'm offered the "opportunity" to also take 2 hour breaks away from the job, but refuse because I don't want to risk losing my job then the other guy isn't really giving me anything. Alot depends on what I have to do to cover for the guy while he is gone. If I'm stuck with his work load it's going to get old fast even if you do get along with the other guy.
pouhe, er, I mean, morpheus133, you have to respond without knowing who is covering what for whom. You're starting to make assumptions, but... you shouldn't. Just what is know is what's to be taken into consideration... like... we don't know who's covering for whom. You know? But... if your assumptions were true, it's cool.
