1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Where to put Von Wafer, when everyone is back.

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by DaDakota, Jan 14, 2009.

?

Where does Von fit in on a healthy Rocket's team?

  1. Starter - he has earned it

    201 vote(s)
    28.9%
  2. Bench - SG off bench

    484 vote(s)
    69.5%
  3. Out of rotation - stash him for next year, or emergencies

    11 vote(s)
    1.6%
  1. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,556
    Likes Received:
    38,778
    Putting aside the Tracy McGrady saga for a minute, let's assume he comes back more motivated and ready to get busy on the court.

    What do we do with Von? Does he continue to start, or does he go to the bench as extra offense?

    Realize that Tmac is a good passer and Von would benefit from playing with a player who passes well.

    The 2nd unit already has Artest and Brooks, would Von work better there?

    Where would you put this guy? What would you do with him?

    Personally, I think unless he falls off into the ocean, he deserves the starting SG spot, he has earned it.

    And if you are going to start him, post a lineup that supports it.

    Mine:

    Brooks - PG
    Wafer - SG
    TMac - SF
    Scola - PF
    Yao - C

    Bench

    Battier
    Artest
    Rafer
    Landry

    Situational bench

    Barry
    Hayes
    Deke

    Deep Freeze

    Luther
    Dorsey


    DD
     
  2. Nolocke

    Nolocke Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,846
    Likes Received:
    62
    The real question will be where do we put Tracy. We know how Von is playing, Tracy on the other hand who the hell knows.
     
  3. Shaud

    Shaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,350
    Likes Received:
    451
    Off the bench for instant offense. He definitely should stay in the rotation.

    They question is who is out of the rotation when everyone is back?
     
  4. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,556
    Likes Received:
    38,778
    I would love to put Tmac at PG, and go from their but I am not sure TMac would go for that.

    DD
     
  5. Shaud

    Shaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,350
    Likes Received:
    451
    Edit : The question
     
  6. Shaud

    Shaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,350
    Likes Received:
    451
    So with that, Rafer is out of the rotation right?

    I'm not sure T-mac would go with it neither. I honestly don't see that knee every healing enough for him to be a PG. He might could run the offense as a PG, but I don't think he could handle guarding Point Guards.
     
  7. Gerrard

    Gerrard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    7
    I think Battier should be moved along with Alston, the team needs a better PG badly. This isn't likely to happen so that said I would go with something like.

    PG Alston(Hopefully once everyone is back he stops shooting so damn much, aside from shooting he is a better PG than Brooks.)
    SG: McGrady
    SF: Battier
    PF: Scola
    C: Yao

    Bench: Artest, Wafer, Brooks, Landry, Mutombo, Barry, Hayes. All of these guys even the last three can contribute something in every game.

    The league requires you have a good bench, the lineup you posted was too offensive and the bench would rely too much on Landry/Artest imo. Artest and Landry aren't really specialist at creating their own shot Wafer is better than both at that so he would probably mix in well with them. Man the team is really deep it's too bad McGrady is a punk on paper we are the best team in the league!
     
  8. The_Yoyo

    The_Yoyo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2001
    Messages:
    16,683
    Likes Received:
    2,873
    I would keep either artest or battier as starter personally because both Tmac and Wafer are not known for their defense. Tmac can be an above average defender but he wont put in the work. Wafer can be too and may develop into a decent defender but he is a bit undersized (isnt he like 6'4 6'5) to guard the larger 2 guards.

    so:
    brooks
    tmac
    Battier
    scola
    yao

    to start

    bench
    barry
    wafer
    artest
    landry

    situational
    hayes/deke

    wish to be traded for any asset
    rafer
    luther

    see ya next year on the court
    dorsey
     
  9. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,892
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    On average, I think the rotation could look something like this with everyone healthy:

    PG - Alston(26), Brooks(22)
    SG - McGrady(30), Wafer/Barry(10), Artest(8)
    SF - Battier(25), Artest (20), McGrady(3)
    PF - Scola (18), Landry (23), Artest(4), Hayes(3)
    C - Yao (34), Scola (8), Hayes (6)

    Minutes:
    Yao - 34
    McGrady - 33
    Artest - 32
    Scola - 26
    Alston - 26
    Battier - 25
    Landry - 23
    Brooks - 22
    Wafer/Barry - 10
    Hayes - 9

    I think Wafer has played himself ahead of Barry. But, knowing Adelman, he may prefer Barry's experience over Wafer's scoring ability once we get back McGrady and Artest.

    Deke will be situational at backup C. Adelman will stick with his small lineup usually, but in case of foul trouble or when facing a big team (e.g. Lakers), Deke will see some minutes.

    Hayes may end up being situational as well, once Artest returns. Ideally, Adelman won't want to use more than about 9 players once the playoffs come around.
     
  10. RocketRaccoon

    RocketRaccoon Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2001
    Messages:
    3,851
    Likes Received:
    164
    You'd hate to keep a guy who might be having a huge break-out year on the bench.

    You'd want to start a guy who looks like he'll be POW soon.

    What do you do?

    I understand why you asked.


    (crap...going to have to get back to this)

    Good question though.
     
  11. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    39,119
    Likes Received:
    28,186
    i would leave him in as the starter. He makes the defense respect the 3 and the drive, thus preventing one more man to Hack yao at will. But i'm not the coach, otherwise I would be wearing a cool jacket with a monacle.

    Von Wafer is like cuttino without the ego, the last of the 'mohawk-ians'.
     
  12. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,181
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    I don't think it makes sense to put t-mac at pg except during crunch time or end of quater situations.

    But I do think you will see Von Wafer and T-mac in the game at the same time.

    Von Wafer won't be a starting SG during the playoffs - he still makes too many mistakes defensively but I must admit he is growing at a pretty rapid rate.
     
  13. BoomShakalaka

    BoomShakalaka Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,953
    Likes Received:
    0
    If Von was erased from the rotation, he will not sign with the Rox due to disrespect, he knows how good he is.
     
  14. Noob Cake

    Noob Cake Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,563
    Likes Received:
    729
    I'll wait for another two weeks, and see if Wafer keeps on shooting above 60%+ (hell 46% would suffice) and drop 20+ few more times.
     
  15. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,556
    Likes Received:
    38,778
    Yes, I think he has gone from a player who hoped he belonged to one that "KNOWS" he belongs.

    We need more of those, and less of the ones that hope...ala Luther.

    DD
     
  16. RV6

    RV6 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    well i think it depends on two things. One, does Wafer continue to shoot well? He's been accused of being streaky, so if he's starts having long slumps consistently then you put him on the bench, but gives him minutes every night. Two, does Tmac come back as "TMAC", or does he come back because he has to and is still not himself? If he's not himself, then I'd put Battier as a starter and bench Tmac to play with the second unit.

    Brooks
    Wafer
    Battier
    Scola
    Yao

    Rafer
    Tmac
    Ron
    Landry
    Deke/hayes

    Might even put Landry as a starter and Scola as a backup because although Battier/Scola/Yao hustle their butts off, that's not a very athletic front line. this has nothing do with how i think is better, just which 5 fit better. I would always play Ron with Rafer because Ron dominates the ball at times, which means Rafer gets it less in the halfcourt.
     
  17. BrooksBall

    BrooksBall Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    20,568
    Likes Received:
    256
    DD, this lineup would be an open invitation for the other team to score 40 points a quarter.

    Brooks - PG
    Wafer - SG
    TMac - SF
    Scola - PF
    Yao - C

    No matter how much McGrady recovers, he'll never be a consistent defender.

    I'm loving Wafer but his lack of experience causes him to miss assignments and switches several times each game.

    I've argued that Brooks' defense isn't bad enough that it should keep him from starting over Alston but, at the same time, I never argued that he was a great defender.

    Scola is a piss poor defender. His rebounding only compensates for some of it.

    Yao is an average, at best, defensive player.


    The starting lineup I'd like to see is...

    Brooks
    McGrady (if he truly returns to form, otherwise Wafer)
    Artest
    Scola
    Yao

    with some combination of Alston, Wafer, Barry, Battier and Landry filling out the rotation. Deke and Hayes are situational players.

    Trade pieces include Alston, Head and Battier. Try to get a better PG than Alston (doesn't have to be a great PG) or more size for the frontcourt. Maybe we can get Andre Miller for the right package.
     
  18. professorjay

    professorjay Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    388
    I'm on board w/ everything here. If Tmac is on the court you need a complimentary defensive asset (Battier or Artest), and in this case I'd start Battier and let Artest give the 2nd unit more firepower.

    Considering Tmac will be less and less of a penetrator, I think starting Brooks gives you that slasher to the basket to keep the defense honest. Wafer has stepped up as another offensive threat off the bench so we can now move Brooks up to start.
     
  19. bbjai

    bbjai Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,693
    Likes Received:
    11
    PG - Alston
    SG -T-mac
    SF - Battier
    PF - Scola
    C - Yao

    Second Unit

    PG - Brooks
    SG - Von Wafer
    SF - Artest
    PF - Landry
    C - Whoever

    Our second unit is WAY WAY ahead of anyone else at the moment if everyone is healthy
     
  20. DtJohnKimbell

    DtJohnKimbell Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    3
    A guy that has played better than the 20 million dollar allstar only gets 10 minutes in your rotation wow that so sad its impressive
     

Share This Page